Submitted by SarcasticGamer t3_11963w8 in nottheonion
Todd-The-Wraith t1_j9lqtuy wrote
For the most of you that won’t read the article: the title is shameless clickbait.
The notice gave 30 days for compliance. It’s a warning not an actual violation, infraction, wtv. It’s nothing more than code enforcement telling you something is wrong.
“If an extension is needed, we will give them that extension,” a representative from the code department explained. “We work with the owners or management.”
Homeowner said the driver’s insurance is paying for the repairs, which should be completed around the end of February.
So to summarize: the city gives a notice saying “hey you need to fix this” but they will work with you to ensure compliance is reasonably possible.
Yes the procedure of issuing it so soon was totally tone deaf and bad optics.
However a notice saying “you have 30 days to repair this” from an agency that explicitly states the 30 days is easily extendable upon request is NOT the same as an imposed fine.
It’s the possibility of a future fine if the homeowner doesn’t make any reasonable efforts. In this case the homeowner expects to be done by next week.
This story is a big ol nothingburger.
KilledByFruit t1_j9lvrwb wrote
I have not read the article yet myself but your comment is reasonable. We accidentally installed a non-compliant fence on our property (not in Texas) and I called the day after receiving the letter to find out our options since they had said we had X amount of weeks to remove it. The building inspector sighed and said, “listen, just the fact that you’re calling right now means that we’re not going to enforce that timeline”. It’s a boilerplate letter and as long as you’re taking action to remedy, they’ll work with you.
Todd-The-Wraith t1_j9lz818 wrote
Yeah notice of violation is intended to sound scary enough to compel compliance.
Here’s the dirty little secret of local government: they’d MUCH rather just have people comply than litigate a contested violation.
barberica t1_j9mo3co wrote
Exact thing happened when my childhood home was hit by a bus. My parents were so pissed that the city was up their asses about repairs when they literally couldn’t make the repairs go any faster, but that’s essentially what it was. They just needed to know work WAS being done in a timely manner.
[deleted] t1_j9md5lf wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j9p6yvw wrote
[removed]
ChanThe4th t1_j9m91o6 wrote
I'm going to take the more realistic approach and say you're completely wrong.
The only reason this person got the extension is because of how much attention this recieved. These government workers don't give af about you or your life. They are there to collect money.
The fact that the person even recieved this notice without being given explicit details on how to proceed says all that needs to be said. This was a cash grab that failed and became embarrassing enough to be swept up before anyone notices the mess.
CoolKicks t1_j9mydwp wrote
A house a neighborhood over from me caught fire. They lost about half the house in the fire, and boarded up what was still standing and just tried to live in the rest of the house. The city had to condemn the house to get them to move out of a house that was no longer habitable.
This code violation seems like the automatic version of that process. Almost certainly the city will issue a violation for a basketball size hole in a wall, or a car size hole, because there is a process to follow to make sure homes are safely habitable.
Is it tone deaf, yes. But for every story like this, someone is still living in the 30% of their home that’s still standing after a fire, and legal process is legal process.
Todd-The-Wraith t1_j9nnooc wrote
Local governments would much MUCH rather have voluntary compliance than face a litigated code violation.
These notice letters have contact information for code enforcement on them.
Now if the homeowner had called and was denied an extension then this would be the outrageous story the headline makes it out to be.
deathleech t1_j9o4vsi wrote
Nah, they are usually pretty good about granting extensions if you try to be reasonable with them. We had to move a shed and I contacted our town. Basically went back and said it’s the middle of winter and I can’t do it at this time of the season. They came back and gave me a 4 month extension no other questions asked. Of course it was a silly warning in the first place, and I am sure some cities are more anal than others, but for the most part they just want you to be in code rather than tick you off or have you ignore them.
jabberwockgee t1_j9nw579 wrote
I imagine it would be easy to find a story where someone had dates set for construction that wasn't within the time limit, so a city kicked them out and made them homeless, right?
ChanThe4th t1_j9nwiar wrote
Yes, you can find the story of a 72yr old cancer patient being fined for not taking care of his yard while doing treatment. You can find stories of people facing violations and fines for endless amounts of absolutely ridiculous issues that would be resolved better by simply calling or reaching out to make sure the person is ok.
Why is it so hard for people to treat others in a humane fashion? Why does everything revolve around punishment rather than simple communication?
jabberwockgee t1_j9nx9no wrote
That's not the same as this situation.
If you're going to be contrary for the sake of being contrary, at least bring an example.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments