"Neo conducted his own defence. He denied using his finger to molest the boy and claimed he had used a pillow instead."

I'm curious. Is there a part of the law that excuses the perp if he didn't use his own body parts?

"Neo also claimed that he had taken the photos of the boy to show him that he was keeping his promise not to touch him again, as he had the chance to touch him but did not." I don't even know where to begin... Just stumped.