Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Jack-Campin t1_ix0z8di wrote

Remember "fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity"? Well this time it's with a really big strapon.

19

SomebodyInNevada t1_ix22rib wrote

And how is this supposed to work? You can't trust them to abide by an agreement to denuclearize.

1

A_MildInconvenience t1_ix2pvu8 wrote

Read the article, not just the headline. It explains what the thought process behind it is

3

Lachainone OP t1_ix2uwrv wrote

Yes, I agree with you. If having nukes on both sides would help denuclearization, then Russia and the US wouldn't be the ones with the biggest reserves.

2

SomebodyInNevada t1_ix46t0l wrote

Russia seems to have kept to their agreements with us until Putin came along. North Korea has never kept their agreements.

2

TAG_8-5 t1_ix4vziy wrote

🤨......makes sense

1

Bungo_pls t1_ix0mngq wrote

It doesn't though. All it needs is to maintain membership A CLOSE RELATIONSHIP WITH NATO and an alliance with the US.

−7

thatthingicn t1_ix11ac1 wrote

Korea is not in nato

11

Bungo_pls t1_ix12u5r wrote

OK fine but it has a close relationship with NATO and is a US ally which essentially affords them the bulk of the benefits either way.

1

DylPickle69 t1_ix1ymnx wrote

Wake up bro.

2

Bungo_pls t1_ix26jv0 wrote

I'm sorry Reddit doesn't have an elementary grasp of geopolitics. You'd think Ukraine would've shown everyone how this works but evidently not.

0