Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Drone30389 t1_ixtrgfj wrote

Reply to comment by PandasInHoodies in Pointing out spelling mistake leads to contempt conviction for Fiji lawyer by Mamacrass

> When someone communicates to the world, but only considers the existence of USA, and don't consider the different nuances around the world.

How do you figure that fits?

−15

Independent-Metal610 t1_ixts3lv wrote

Not OP but I’m just gonna take a wild stab in the dark here, so take what I’m about to say with a grain of salt. I could be completely wrong. Here goes:

Fiji isn’t the USA.

23

Drone30389 t1_ixtsn3z wrote

Of course it's not, why would they suggest needing a 1st amendment if it was?

11

Alexstarfire t1_ixu1u2s wrote

Yea, I'm confused by the downvotes. The original comment doesn't even make sense if they are talking about the USA.

9

Briancl12 t1_ixugjrb wrote

Because 1. First Amendment means something very different in most countries 2. It implies that the US First Amendment is the only thing that allows freedom of speech

7

Bestihlmyhart t1_ixugs3l wrote

It doesn’t. The dude literally said that’s why they need a first amendment not that they have one

3

Bolusss t1_ixwak4m wrote

What would be in that amendment? Chapter 2 of the constitution already guarantees their rights?

1