Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

YakInner4303 t1_ixvd8dk wrote

In the United States, the judiciary is considered a branch of government coequal with the legislative and executive branches.

Regardless, the courts draw authority from laws. These are required to not infringe on freedom of speech by the US constitution. So a court cannot properly interpret a contempt law in a way that would allow a 'contempt of court' citation to infringe on freedom of speech.

4

randomFrenchDeadbeat t1_ixyffyk wrote

Dude, that was a public message on facebook, not a remark done in a court of law. Read the damn article.

This has nothing to do with freedom of speech.

Mandatory XKCD:

https://xkcd.com/1357/

0

YakInner4303 t1_ixz8080 wrote

You made a false statement about US law. I corrected you.

The guy spoke in a public forum. The court took action to silence him. Very much a free speech issue.

1

randomFrenchDeadbeat t1_ixzmv4p wrote

No it is not. Read the damn XKCD.

−2

ShadowDragon8685 t1_iy09w80 wrote

Yes it is. Mocking the court for the court's mistake is very much free speech in the U.S. The government, in the form of the court punishing the mocking party, would very quickly find itself on the wrong side of a ACLU lawsuit for infringing upon free speech.

1

randomFrenchDeadbeat t1_iy2ogp8 wrote

0

ShadowDragon8685 t1_iy2p3qj wrote

> This is in relation to a committal proceeding filed against him by Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama and Attorney General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum.

Mmmmh, yes, we sure do have a Prime Minister here in the United States.


In case this poster deletes his post full'o ignorance, here it is, in full:

> [–]randomFrenchDeadbeat [score hidden] 8 minutes ago 

> No, and you are wrong, proof here :

> https://www.fbcnews.com.fj/news/court/lautoka-lawyer-convicted-of-contempt-of-court/

1

randomFrenchDeadbeat t1_iy2pytg wrote

lol

i didnt even check who I was talking to.

you manage to answer twice, and wonder why you got the same answer twice XD

0