Submitted by N2929 t3_10b177x in nottheonion
Comments
Banea-Vaedr t1_j47g7di wrote
The line between campaigning and bribery is thin
Dangerousrhymes t1_j47gb2r wrote
If pastries are enough to swing voters we have bigger problems.
Banea-Vaedr t1_j47gepq wrote
The question is where the line between campaigning and bribery is, because it truly has not been made clear.
Dangerousrhymes t1_j47hqkq wrote
Probably depends on the context. The way I see it it works like this.
“You can have these pastries if you agree to vote for me” = Bribe
“Come to our campaign event, we will have snacks” = Not a Bribe
There seems to be a lot of other controversy around this campaign/candidate but buying coffee, tea, and six cinnamon rolls from the establishment hosting your event for the people coming to the event seems like an incredibly low threshold for bribery.
[deleted] t1_j47jbju wrote
[deleted]
PlutoTheGod t1_j47nesf wrote
It’s pretty funny that if you did this to scale it probably would work. Most local votes people have absolutely no fucking clue who the names are for many positions. If you simply were remembered as “that person who gave me a chocolate eclair” you’d probably win by landslide without ever doing any campaigning lmfao
DaveOJ12 t1_j47r2kw wrote
So many reposts on this subreddit...
r/nottheonion/comments/10ah1xg/judge_rejects_former_mayors_claim_that_election/
Dangerousrhymes t1_j47femh wrote
Isn’t that just… campaigning?