Infernalism t1_j5m4qdm wrote
He's right.
People have been babbling about 'superhero fatigue' since before the first Avengers movie. They still make billions every time a big one comes out.
It's a niche now. Like Westerns. As long as Marvel/Disney keeps making quality movies, people will keep going to see them.
If they make a string of JL/Morbius garbage movies, that might change, though.
iamsoupcansam t1_j5m86qb wrote
We need Mel Brooks to come out of retirement to do to superhero movies what he did to westerns.
Meanderingversion t1_j5mcekt wrote
While I wish he could, he deserves to rest in the living world while he has the chance to.
hour_of_the_rat t1_j5php20 wrote
>he deserves to rest
He's still working. He wants to die at work.
BrightBlueSquid t1_j5n7813 wrote
As it happens, he is coming out of retirement. He's doing a mini series of "History of the World: Part II" that's due out in a month or so.
Infernalism t1_j5m8ec6 wrote
"The Sheriff is a-near!"
killerbee2319 t1_j5md6s0 wrote
Or, and hear me out now, you could just... idk... not watch them?
I mean... that's what we did to transformers...
Ok. That was a bad example. Aparently, the last one made 32 cents, and the studio was super out of ideas.
No_Carpet7125 t1_j5mhvh8 wrote
We need a gritty Go-Bot reboot.
Bonezone420 t1_j5nnqus wrote
The western comparison is one that pops up a lot, and I've made it myself, but the conditions are nowhere near the same, honestly. Not that it can't happen - but a lot of people who make it don't entirely understand how and why the western died and thus it often gets reduced to "there were too many of them and people got tired of them". Which doesn't quite capture the scope of it.
For a start, while we've had super hero movies as arguably the dominant film mainstay for like twenty years now; westerns were dominant for eighty. But not just that, but there were a lot of them. People complain about getting a handful of super hero movies from like, two different megacorps every year - imagine if every movie studio was still releasing their own super hero movie like they very briefly started to back when marvel first really took off. Imagine the world where that never stopped, where we not only had a million adaptations, but companies just started greenlighting every jackass who walked into the office going "I HAVE AN IDEA SIR IT'S CALLED STRONG MAN, AND IT'S ABOUT A MAN WHO'S REALLY STRONG" or some shit. Because that's basically how it was with westerns, especially after the first thirty year period of dominance and other genres (like musicals) started to take the stage; they just began to mass make as much shit as they could to save any vestige of that waning popularity they could. There was so much shit, the sheer volume of westerns outpaced every other genre combined.
But, funny enough, there's a simple reason why that won't happen with super hero movies - and it's the exact reason why so many people hate them. The big box office marvel and DC shit? Those cost a lot of money to make. Money and time. It's hard for any jackass to make one of their own, and a bad one hurts the company's bottom line and they don't like that. A western, on the other hand? Access to a rocky location, some sunny weather, and a prop department willing to look through second hand stores until you find enough battered, dusty, jeans, vests, and hats to fit the cast and you've got about 80% of the movie right there for cheap. They were relatively cheap, fast, and easy to produce for most studios, basically, and given that; they had a pretty safe return on profit which meant more would be made more often. You simply can't do that with the marvel mega films.
InternetPeon t1_j5mbqbe wrote
Sure a comic book can be any story you can imagine.
AND if you keep recycling formulaic tropes people will tire of you.
Infernalism t1_j5mbvwo wrote
Well, it's been 20 years or something.
[deleted] t1_j5o7sup wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments