Kaiju_Cat t1_j50ulkt wrote
Reply to comment by TheFirstUranium in Woman sues concert venue after getting so drunk she blew up a home, caused $15M in damages by EyeWantItThatWay
People who continue to serve someone who is in no condition to make a rational judgment alcohol for the purpose of profit deserve to be held liable for their grossly negligent actions. People like you pretend like that also somehow means that the person who drank the alcohol is now completely absolved of all responsibility.
No. Everyone involved was at fault to some degree. It's up to the courts to figure out exactly where that fault lies. A lot of people go through life thinking that fault is some kind of 100% 0% fault lies. A lot of people go through life thinking that fault is some kind of 100% 0% game.
And that's an absurdly childish and uselessly simplistic way of looking at things in a situation like this.
People hear that a company might be liable for gross negligence and they like to puff up their chest and act all self-righteous and loudly declare that no one is held responsible for their own actions anymore and it's just the dumbest shit.
Stop.
happygobeepbeep t1_j5eoesw wrote
You sound like someone who's never been in a bar before. What you're suggesting basically would require a polygraph of all customers without sober company after 2 beers, maybe even one. Some people take medications such that they get drunk off a single beer. Guess the bartender is supposed to know that through omniscience on your view?
Forget a bar, I dunno if youve been off reddit and in the real world ever.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments