Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

fe2sio4 t1_j6wrg0r wrote

I wouldn’t be surprised if the restaurant owner is somehow linked to him or his staff.

330

SP919212973 t1_j6wsh7c wrote

This guy is completely terrible, but this story makes me wonder what would happen if someone investigated all politicians like they investigated Santos. I'd guess we'd have an endless supply of stories like this.

44

Rottimer t1_j6wv67i wrote

How the fuck did they not interview the restaurant owner?

121

BringMeInfo t1_j6wvi4g wrote

And many, many times, his reported total was exactly $1 less than the point at which you legally need to provide receipts.

97

TetraCubane t1_j6wvq68 wrote

This guy is a piece of shit for the lying but I thought in general that politicians or people on campaigns are allowed to use funds on stuff like this, hotels, business class/first class flights, etc.

2

Rottimer t1_j6wwcz2 wrote

The bigger your name, generally the more investigated you’ll be. Trump is going through the shit he’s going through because he decided to run for president. Of course journalists and partisans are going to go through his shit with a fine toothed comb. The same thing happened to Obama, the Bushes, McCain, etc.

Think about Obama. They found a video of his pastor giving a sermon that touched on 9/11 when Obama apparently wasn’t even at church that was mildly critical of US foreign policy. That’s how in-depth they looked at his life. McCain has an adopted daughter from Bangladesh. They even combed through her life when she was a child to find something.

So while there might be skeletons in some of their closets. In general, the higher you get, the more scrutiny you get. Don’t run for office if you have unresolved criminal shit in your background (hookers, nannies paid under the table, alcoholism, illicit drug use, etc.). It will come out. And have a story for the resolved criminal shit.

Sadly, you can probably get away with domestic violence.

13

bittoxic00 t1_j6wwe1s wrote

Commenting here for the time stamp, I suspect this guy never loaned his campaign 700k. It was just an excuse to grift a lump sum from contributors

61

El_Gato t1_j6wwgaa wrote

ha! look at the source. Chatgpt can only spit out so much shit content. It's actually pretty impressive that this rag consistently winds up on the front page.

101

Suhweetusername t1_j6wxzeb wrote

So, that amount was spent over 32 visits to the restaurant. Thats like $800/visit on average. Depending on the size of the party size and food and drinks ordered, it doesn’t seem crazy.

30

FormerKarmaKing t1_j6wy97t wrote

Bingo. Of all his lies, when I saw that number my alarm bells went off because it would be such a simple con. The "money" is already gone and political donors rarely go fishing inside the books of a campaign, win or lose.

And that could be the real twist: brazen con-man wins election when all he was trying to do was fleece some donors.

Netflix, send me my check.

50

FormerKarmaKing t1_j6wyhol wrote

> Insider doesn't know exactly what was on the menu during the 32 separate appearances at Il Bacco — which his campaign lists as "dinner meetings," "fundraising events," and "food and drink" expenses.

Santos is a scum bag but 32 meetings at a restaurant could easily blow $26k. I know people don't want to hear that, but of all his lies this one is one of the more plausible.

9

Buffy11bnl t1_j6wynnp wrote

Yeah, that’s called money laundering and it’s an old story - especially with restaurants that are “cash only”

27

stratrookie t1_j6wypm1 wrote

Santos sucks but this “article” is trash

5

paperhawks t1_j6x1va9 wrote

While awful, I'm sitting here thinking about how I've accepted rigatoni Bolognese is ~$23.

17

Moretalent t1_j6x20g0 wrote

this is a major reach look at any campaign's records they spend a ton on food for events

1

bittoxic00 t1_j6x2a98 wrote

But I believe in his mind he thought he could use real money from donors to pay himself back the fake 700k loan. That even if he didn’t win he could net some big money

Edit: I realized not fully reading your comment while driving caused me to summarize exactly what you said, he definitely just wanted the campaign grift

5

srpokemon t1_j6x4o6e wrote

well to be fair most campaigns spend a fuckton of money on dinners, just depends what the dinner was used for if this was a standard use

1

dlm2137 t1_j6x5nl1 wrote

Sorry but their math is off. If the bolognese is $23 on the menu, that means it is $28.49 with tax and a 15% tip. So that would be 913 rigatoni bolognese, not the 1,131 that the article claims.

Guy is still an asshole tho.

15

Castor_and_Pollux123 t1_j6x604q wrote

🎶 Bottle of reds, Bottle of whites, perhaps some Rosé instead, whatever you're in the mood for tonight 🎶

1

OrangeSlimeSoda t1_j6x6hwr wrote

I've never worked on a political campaign, but surely 32 meetings/events at the same business during a single election campaign cycle is unusual unless the politician has some sort of personal connection to the business or its owner, right?

EDIT: Did a bit of quick math. He announced his candidacy in June 2021, and between then and November 2022 was about 16 months, which is 64 weeks, which is 448 days. With 32 meetings, that comes out to a meeting/event there once every 14 days (or once every two weeks).

5

grantrules t1_j6x6pw4 wrote

> It's actually pretty impressive that this rag consistently winds up on the front page.

Haha. I didn't read the article and didn't know what the source was.. I read your comment and immediately said "Business Insider"

36

wookietennis t1_j6x7vuv wrote

He’s got the FUPA to show form it as well.

1

ncovariant t1_j6x8djk wrote

Yeah, doesn’t nearly rise to the eyebrow-raising level of the average Santos story, and surely wouldn’t stand out if one went digging into dining and catering budgets of other campaigns. The 26K was spent over 32 separate occasions. Alright well sure 26K buys a lot of rigatoni bolognese, but within realm of typical political campaign catering expenses — fundraisers, wine-and-dines with donors and endorsers, lunch meetings with staff, consultants, etc — it doesn’t buy much at all. It buys a little more if you do a lot of it at the same place, and if you’re running in New York, it’s probably wise to pick a New York family owned Italian restaurant, rather than a Chicago family owned Italian restaurant. 🤷

3

-Handsome-Jim- t1_j6xdddf wrote

I don't really want to give George Santos any benefit of the doubt but that's actually not that unreasonable if the office picked up dinner for the staff with some regularity. I mean I did two dinner seminars a week prior to COVID and put about $100,000 on my business credit card every year at local restaurants. That's not even including picking up the tab for food during weekly call sessions, etc.

I don't know how long that bill is over but if it's a year then that works out to $500 a week and if the rigatoni is $23 then that's two weekly meals for a relatively small office. Add in drinks or dessert and that's one weekly meal for a relatively small office. He should resign but I don't actually see anything glaring about this.

2

kimolas t1_j6xfrjk wrote

Business Insider started as a low quality clickbait social media site (think early era buzzfeed), but it pretends to be reputable.

I wouldn't be surprised to learn that most of its content now is being posted with zero oversight from an actual journalist or writer.

12

Keep_The_Peach t1_j6xgpj9 wrote

Sorry but with taxes(~8% in NY) and tips (let' say 15%), you can't buy 1,131 rigatoni bolognese ($23)

x * (23 + 23 * 0.08) + 26000 * 0.15 = 26000
x = (26000 - 26000 * 0.15) / (23 + 23 * 0.08)
x = 889.69

You can actually buy 889 rigatoni bolognese in that restaurant.

If you're really hungry, 974 penne vodka!

3

atl_cracker t1_j6xh33s wrote

getting Santos-fatigue. eerily similar to Trump-fatigue. and worse because it seems increasingly by design.

2

Colavs9601 t1_j6xiohy wrote

look there are a lot of things I will rip on a politician for but eating a shitton of Italian food ain’t it.

2

johnsciarrino t1_j6xjw98 wrote

Joey Il Bacco is no more tied to the mob than any italian restaurant owner in queens. Mobsters have to eat somewhere and the restaurant owner has to cater to them when they get there because they usually spend big money and throw big tips around.

Infinitely more interesting than any organized crime ties is the fact that Il Bacco is ALSO the place that hosted the Republican Christmas party during quarantine in 2020.

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/531264-republican-clubs-indoor-holiday-party-in-queens-goes-viral-for-conga/

89

jkeegan123 t1_j6xkdny wrote

Reported on expense report that day as: $199.99

1

sunflowercompass t1_j6xkyz7 wrote

What gets to me is we still don't know where the money came from. So basically the FEC is.. waiting for Santos to respond to a letter asking for more information?

>Mr. Kappel said that the change on Mr. Santos’s campaign filings would be likely to trigger a letter from the F.E.C. asking for more information on the source of the loan.

So in a few months they are gonna fine him a pittance, it's gonna turn out he lied again, then maybe GOP leadership tries to get him to resign so he doesn't get prosecuted in return. Same fucking bullshit.

2

frogvscrab t1_j6xlcal wrote

> Chatgpt can only spit out so much shit content.

This is really just silly. This article could have been written in 10 minutes by an actual human being. Its not some lengthy or complex thing to do that would require them to use an AI.

5

johnsciarrino t1_j6xmc8o wrote

i know you're being saracastic but...of course he is. He runs a good restaurant in a good location with good food. My family has been going there for years, hosted my grandfather's 80th birthday there. Unfortunate these GOP skells flock there but i assume their money is still green like anyone else's.

26

FormerKarmaKing t1_j6xofti wrote

Santos almost certainly was getting kick-backs from the restaurant, but at least in the business world, 32 meetings at the same restaurant isn't impossible to believe.

When one is raising money - either for business or politics - one is essentially running a dramatic production. So I want as much control over the "set" of that play as possible.

Using the same restaurant means the staff, whom I tip regularly and above average, know how I like things and will step in the right times. Great waiters are also experts at making certain people have a good time. That can be a huge help as you wouldn't believe how many rich people are actually unhappy, bored, or both.

And the owner will love me because I bring them so much business, and likely, new wealthy customers, too. They'll make it a habit to come over, make certain everything is great, give us special stuff, even talk me up.

Regulars will see this and want to know me because people like people that other people like. I'll likely shake a few hands on my way to my regular table.

All of this increases the "halo" around me. Without saying anything to the investor / donor, I'm demonstrating that I'm special and that people like me. That alone won't make the invest/donate, but it definitely helps, even if it means they're just happy to take another meeting with me in the future.

7

johnsciarrino t1_j6xp16b wrote

lolol. funny enough, i actually thought about Artie Bucco when i was writing my first comment here because Joey Il Bacco really is like Artie but without the childhood friendship with a mob boss. The fact that i missed your quote just means i'm probably due for a rewatch of the show.

10

brownredgreen t1_j6xph9n wrote

It's super suspicious that his bill just always happened to be below the legal requirement for a receipt.

Almost like he was trying to hide something.

Your defense of him makes me suspicious of you.

Is your name Anthony by any chance?

7

YounomsayinMawfk t1_j6xqwu9 wrote

$26000 on rigatoni?! What did these rigatoni, they cure cancer?

1

kimbolll t1_j6xr88q wrote

I could go for a rigatoni bolognese right now. Anyone got his number?

1

brownredgreen t1_j6xsfij wrote

It is not important.

In fact, its a poor attempt at defending Santos, when he is CLEARLY a shady, lying fuckhead.

The $199.99 amount is FAR more important to understand than the total amount spent.

Yes, lots of food for lots of people can add up to big numbers.

No, $199.99 charges REPEATEDLY are not a coincidence.

4

chengjih t1_j6xtiet wrote

To be fair, he may have been ordering separate dishes for each of his alters.

1

itsdone20 t1_j6xtuk7 wrote

Who the fuck voted for this shit stain

1

Kaptain_Knuckles t1_j6xu9hz wrote

could we now break down the national deficit in terms of pasta? i’m having trouble following all these big numbers but this puts it in a totally relatable perspective where even i can understand it

1

Throwawayhelp111521 t1_j6xubfe wrote

I can't stand Santos, but there's no context. What do other campaigns spend on food?

3

pompcaldor t1_j6xvpx8 wrote

> Sadly, you can probably get away with domestic violence.

Not domestic violence, but sexual harassment and assault. Because the reporters are in on it too. See: Mark Halperin.

5

MonteXristo t1_j6xvsze wrote

I didn’t even think about that. If he had 10 people per se (idk how many were there) and they each had apps, entrees, desserts, sides, and dozens of bottles of old expensive wine and booze I could see it going into 5 figures easily. 26k is a lot, but who knows.

Edit: is it true this is from over 30 trips to the restaurant? Because then it’s a nothing burger

4

dropdeadbarbie t1_j6y138j wrote

my friends had an entire wedding there and it didn't cost $26,000

1

soverysmart t1_j6ydnli wrote

It's only illegal when you're structuring your drug money deposits, not when you are doing an end run around campaign finance rules

Campaign finance violations are mostly fines and potentially sanctions

6

BronxLens t1_j6yds78 wrote

>Santos' financial disclosures also revealed he owes the restaurant another $18,773.54 for a campaign election night event.

>The campaign's updated disclosures show they paid down $8,000 on that debt.

>That brings Santos' total Italian food expenditure up to $44,805.60.

2

MountainAd4530 t1_j6yetas wrote

That place is an insurrectionists wet dream with all the pictures of fascists on the wall. Food is decent, Lenny's clam bar is much better.

1

rockguitardude t1_j6ygddz wrote

This places him firmly above the 1,000 rigatoni bolognese limit per campaign finance laws.

2

GKrollin t1_j6yhjs2 wrote

There’s absolutely zero documentation in any of these links but if you have some I’d be happy to review them

How exactly would Santos have calculated the distance of an Uber trip that cost exactly $199.99?

−6

Electronic-Place-211 t1_j6yk9m9 wrote

Anytime anyone sees an Italian-American doing good for themselves and have a lot of money they assume it’s a mob but idk

0

gerd50501 t1_j6z0o1z wrote

this is always alchohol. what did they order?

1

Paintingmyfreedom t1_j6z4ljp wrote

Well 8 different trips came to exactly $199.99. Just below the reporting limit of $200.

You ever hear of that bridge for sale? I can get you deal for it for 199.99.

Just kidding I don’t think your stupid. Just that you put political party above facts, decency, and our democratic system

3

NutellaBananaBread t1_j6z88bx wrote

People forget that Santos is a world champion competitive eater and always tips 300%.

1

TwoCats_OneMan t1_j705cvj wrote

Things are okay with me these days Got a good job, got a good office Got a new wife, got a new life And the family's fine

1

Suhweetusername t1_j72an9m wrote

It’s not a reporting limit, because it was obviously reported by the campaign. It’s a limit for keeping receipts, but by all means, investigate and see what the deal is. The restaurants and hotels should have invoices/charges for the past year.

2

sophijor t1_j74kxcy wrote

I mean if it's in New York, in Queens, of course it would have mob ties at least somehow. Someone who knew someone who knew someone who knew someone knew someone who had a brother in the mob.

1