Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

squall571 t1_j9fti62 wrote

It’s always profitable doing business with the city.

173

Emperor_Moon t1_j9h5v48 wrote

Of course after all it not the government/politicians picking up the bill, it the hard working modern day economic slaves taxpayers that paying for it.

30

dproma t1_j9ixyit wrote

Can’t wait to hear when the government buys back the same ventilators for $24M next year

3

SettingSufficient788 t1_j9g11aq wrote

It’s almost as if the city didn’t know what equipment would be needed to fight a disease no one had any experience with…

111

hatts t1_j9g4npt wrote

100%

i have no doubt that there are a LOT of rackets going on between vendors and govt. procurement, but you gotta spend—probably inefficiently!—to rapidly respond to a crisis

51

pixel_of_moral_decay t1_j9g5o6k wrote

Agreed. My only gripe is this is going to be resold to hospital systems at a profit.

I’d much rather see hospitals pooling resources and selling to each other at cost.

This just lets a middleman collect profit by inserting themselves into the equation. And protects manufacturers from seeing a drop in demand.

19

Jerund t1_j9g8pv9 wrote

Then the hospitals themselves need to hire people to facilitate the logistics for it. City has not control over Private hospitals to make them even trade with each other for resources. City hospitals is even more of a joke. Look at the pay difference between city hospitals and private hospitals.

5

lantonas t1_j9iq08n wrote

> Agreed. My only gripe is this is going to be resold to hospital systems at a profit.

Nobody wants, or needs, this shit

3

Willygolightly t1_j9g3qy9 wrote

That's kind of my take on this.... I would rather this be the outcome than a fulfilled need for 3,000 bridge ventilators in a city where 8M live. Just because you don't use your insurance, doesn't mean it's a bad investment.

15

Amphiscian t1_j9g5c6x wrote

Also it's not like just an NYC problem. You can find similar stories from many cities and countries. It sucks, but it's not like we're the only place that got things wrong in the end in some way.

5

ripstep1 t1_j9jagbh wrote

I mean sure. Government is incompetent in general. They don’t know anything about medicine period. They should have gone to hospitals and doctors to have them handle the funds.

0

Carmilla31 t1_j9g0t09 wrote

Not to mention renting the Javits center and getting a hospital boat that no one even used.

82

jay5627 t1_j9g8ni9 wrote

Javits Center was really convenient for getting the vaccine

82

Carmilla31 t1_j9gb1in wrote

I got it a local pharmacy pretty easy.

−23

drpvn t1_j9gfhla wrote

Without having to schlep all the way to the Hudson.

−1

DJBabyB0kCh0y t1_j9ghhum wrote

And nobody with machine guns pushing you thru the line. I also got mine at a local pharmacy the first day I could. I was having a drink and the bartender told me they got vaccine next door. I said keep my tab open I'll be right back. 5 minutes in and out.

−5

gigawort t1_j9husui wrote

Maybe you got in and out easy because hundreds of thousands of people got theirs at Javits & other mass vax sites.

14

Carmilla31 t1_j9gieex wrote

Why am i being downvoted for saying i had an easy time getting the vaccine at a pharmacy? :o

1

DJBabyB0kCh0y t1_j9gogxb wrote

I dunno I didn't downvote you. Maybe people think you're implying we didn't need Javits. At the time we definitely needed anything that would get more vaccines out there. Personally I waited until I could get it in my neighborhood which was only a few days after my age bracket opened up.

13

Guypussy t1_j9gro9j wrote

Probably members of the Javits family.

0

lantonas t1_j9ipxbx wrote

SUNY Stony Brook, SUNY Old Westbury, and Westchester County Center all had field hospitals that closed without seeing a single patient.

Total Cost: $320,976,632

11

4GIFs t1_j9rbq70 wrote

Source!? And it cant be right-wing!

−2

sulaymanf t1_j9ipss7 wrote

Doctor here and I sent patients over there.

The Javits center was helpful because we needed beds. However since it wasn’t a hospital with all the associated services we had to restrict who could go to Javits center. Anyone who couldn’t walk couldn’t get transferred there. Neither could anyone who needed specialty consults. No children, no pregnant women. Nobody on a ventilator and anyone who looked like they would go on a vent we held in the hospital in case they crashed. So we offloaded a lot of the “healthier” patients there who just needed oxygen.

The USS Comfort was a hospital ship but they also had limitations. They required a complicated set of steps to do a hospital-to-hospital transfer of a patient, and they asked for no women or children and they had limited specialists; if you needed a cardiologist they shouldn’t get transferred.

In the end NY was able to flatten the curve and after a few weeks the need for both was lessened.

6

bottom t1_j9gc782 wrote

damn, we have to made global pandemic more efficient ! 🤦‍♂️

2

tuberosum t1_j9gi5jg wrote

I'm not really sure what the point of that article is.

Yeah, shit was bought at a premium, in a hurry, because we had no idea which way things were going to go. Hospitals were running out of supplies and doctors and nurses sported hefty bags instead of disposable scrubs and were asked to "sterilize" and reuse their own disposable masks.

What should have been the right move? Wait and see? I guess that's the implication here, that this was all wasted money that the city could have saved if it only waited and saw how things were going. Except, of course, then The City could have written a nice article about how city leaders knew and could source supplies but waited, choosing to save money, instead saving who knows how many lives.

61

lantonas t1_j9iposn wrote

SUNY Stony Brook, SUNY Old Westbury, and Westchester County Center all had field hospitals that closed without seeing a single patient.

Total Cost: $320,976,632

10

nycdataviz t1_j9j7vsv wrote

CorpoMedia: And here's why that's a good thing.

6

tuberosum t1_j9ji63j wrote

See, if I had your powers of telling the future, I would have probably looked up the lottery numbers...

−1

[deleted] t1_j9i20gg wrote

[deleted]

−1

Anti-ThisBot-IB t1_j9i21l5 wrote

Hey there samlukrec1! If you agree with someone else's comment, please leave an upvote instead of commenting "This"! By upvoting instead, the original comment will be pushed to the top and be more visible to others, which is even better! Thanks! :)


^(I am a bot! Visit) ^(r/InfinityBots) ^(to send your feedback! More info:) ^(Reddiquette)

8

AbazabaYouMyOnlyFren t1_j9gcx2w wrote

Holy crap. What's the hurry?

They spent all this time and money getting this stuff now they're just going to dump it?

This couldn't be warehoused for a few years to be prepared for the next time?

57

Productpusher t1_j9gyehn wrote

Virtually all of it has expiration dates and many are probably enough to last way past those dates .

Tri state warehouse space is most expensive in America

32

AbazabaYouMyOnlyFren t1_j9h1lw1 wrote

I highly doubt much of it has any expiration date that have passed. Feel free to prove me wrong.

NY is a big state, it's not as if much cheaper space couldn't be had elsewhere in NY.

7

chengjih t1_j9hqq6i wrote

The article actually gave an example of sanitizing wipes that expired on January 31.

Agreed, some of the stuff they're selling is don't have expiry dates, like disposal gowns. But some of the other stuff is literally junk sold to the City for exorbitant prices, like uncertified "N95" masks and the article lead-in "bridge vents" which were ever used and will never be used, as they're not actual medical devices, but rather something built by amatuers thinking this is how it ventilators work.

11

froginbog t1_j9io9sy wrote

All of the PPE has expiration dates, including N95s

4

AbazabaYouMyOnlyFren t1_j9iozkk wrote

So what's your point?

It's not possible any of that PPE is expired in such a short timeframe. N-95s easily last for years.

−4

sulaymanf t1_j9ipvwk wrote

N95s are not sterile. Sterile supplies do expire.

2

AbazabaYouMyOnlyFren t1_j9irjkk wrote

I see, and they have a shelf life of 3 days? Thanks for clearing that up.

TIL that n95 masks don't last very long.

−1

sulaymanf t1_j9irwy7 wrote

Not sure why you’re being snarky when this is an obvious fact to anyone who works in healthcare. Any sterile supplies have an expiration date as that is when the manufacturer can no longer guarantee sterility. Everything from sutures to surgical scissors to sterile gauze has an expiration date attached. They’re usually good for years, but now we are approaching 3 years from the start of Covid and stuff is starting to expire. Non-disposable equipment like clamps and scissors can be autoclaved or otherwise disinfected but all the disposable supplies are expiring and can no longer be safely used due to strict safety regulations.

n95 masks and face shields and smocks are not sterile and as such they don’t have expiration dates. They are meant to be single used and then disposed. But this article is not talking about PPE so I’m not sure why you keep bringing it up.

6

AbazabaYouMyOnlyFren t1_j9isn4p wrote

Why? Because I never said they don't have an expiration date and you completely ignored the point

People worked in the same masks and other PPE for weeks because they couldn't get replacements. "Starting to expire" is nonsense. Everything that has an expiration date is starting to expire, but why would you get rid of it before it is?

−2

sulaymanf t1_j9it6bv wrote

Let me explain it again; the article is about medical supplies expiring. All you are talking about is PPE even though it’s not what the article is talking about. Go back and read it again.

> People worked in the same masks and other PPE for weeks because they couldn’t get replacements.

Yes I was one of them on the front lines. It’s not advisable but it was all we had, there wasn’t good data on how well protection lasted after more than 10 hours of use which is why they were replaced regularly under normal conditions. We made do by adding layers like a surgical mask on top of the n95.

> Everything that has an expiration date is starting to expire, but why would you get rid of it before it is?

Because we don’t like putting stuff about to imminently expire on the shelf next to stuff that won’t; people grab the wrong one too often. That’s partly why CVS won’t keep any prescription meds on their shelves that will expire in less than 2 months, to avoid them getting mixed in and sold with pills that won’t expire for longer.

6

froginbog t1_j9k2i62 wrote

There’s a limited time for them to recoup any costs. They clearly had more than they thought they needed and the market is clearly flooded because of the expiration in 5 years etc

1

Unique_Bunch t1_j9gnkf5 wrote

Maybe storing depreciating equipment in the most expensive real estate in the country isn't the brilliant business move you seem to think it is

14

AbazabaYouMyOnlyFren t1_j9h39xo wrote

Maybe making wrong assumptions isn't something you should be snarky about.

If only there were other places, like an hour or two away that had plenty of space that doesn't cost a fortune?

Whatever, it's going to come out that all of this shit was resold for 20x what they paid for it.

−2

Somenakedguy t1_j9hex7k wrote

What are the logistics of getting all of this equipment to a storage facility hours away and then actually getting it back when needed, while being hours away, on top of the storage costs?

It’s a sunk cost and in all likelihood auctioning it off was the most efficient way to get rid of equipment they had no use for and no realistic and cost effective way to store. It’s unfortunate that the money was wasted but if the virus had been deadlier than it was in reality it all would’ve been needed. It made sense with the information we had at the time

6

Unique_Bunch t1_j9ib6r4 wrote

hahahaha. yeah, I'm the one making assumptions here.

if you think you can make a profit off this then go ahead and bid on some surplus covid medical equipment. hire some truckers in the middle of a logistical and real estate crisis and sell it for profit in 5 years!

2

AbazabaYouMyOnlyFren t1_j9iqs3o wrote

Hurrrrr durrrr, go make da profit.

Yeah I guess you forget the utter chaos that ensued when the city was caught flat footed and couldn't get supplies at the start of the pandemic.

It's fucking hilarious seeing all the penny punching bean counters come out of the woodwork, as if the cost of storing this stuff is an unaffordable burden compared to the mess we just went through because we didn't have it.

People never learn. Lol.

1

Unique_Bunch t1_j9ks78q wrote

Did you forget to switch accounts or something? How does this work with your first comment?

3

lantonas t1_j9iprsi wrote

Because we discovered that ventilators kill people.

−1

AbazabaYouMyOnlyFren t1_j9iq3mz wrote

You spelled COVID wrong.

2

AbazabaYouMyOnlyFren t1_j9irt9y wrote

You still spelled COVID wrong.

I know all about the ventilators, I read the news 2 years ago when they were rethinking how to treat patients.

2

lantonas t1_j9is1cm wrote

Three years ago. Literally weeks into the lockdown. April 2020 (some) people knew that ventilators were killing people.

It's a good thing these ventilators were never used, they only would have killed more people.

7

AbazabaYouMyOnlyFren t1_j9isqi4 wrote

You spelled COVID wrong again.

0

lantonas t1_j9it8vr wrote

Instead of scraping these ventilators, they should have started giving them out free to people like you with a positive test result.

6

TwoBehindTheEyes t1_j9fypz6 wrote

well yes that is typically how things go when they sell for scrap rates

33

RyuNoKami t1_j9ga5mn wrote

did people somehow expect "used" items to sell for more money?

4

mahleg t1_j9iy2ev wrote

Should’ve called it “vintage” then!

2

[deleted] t1_j9goad1 wrote

[deleted]

8

lantonas t1_j9iq5cl wrote

> Maybe they should throw it in a warehouse or something instead of selling it

Where do you think this crap has been for the last 3 years?

3

lupuscapabilis t1_j9h1n5u wrote

>The amount of people here that have come to believe that Covid was never a threat is comical

You seem to forget how many people were saying that we didn't need to overreact carelessly. There were an awful lot of places that didn't overspend like this.

To act like "no one knew!" is also revisionist history.

−2

gigawort t1_j9hv49c wrote

Yeah, they didn't overspend because they weren't an initial epicenter like NYC. By the time it hit them hard, they already had an idea of what worked and what was needed.

2

upnflames t1_j9hjn7h wrote

I sold COVID testing supplies during the pandemic, it was ridiculous the amount of money that the city was literally throwing at companies.

Before the pandemic, my average sale for a particular item was $5-$10k with a 20-30% institutional discount for hospitals and med schools. Ubiquitous, commodity type of lab product. One morning in August 2020, I get a call from a company I never heard of looking for a ridiculous amount of these things. Initially, I thought it might be a reseller or just someone throwing huge numbers up to fish for bulk discounting (this was early days, before I realized the flood gates were open). I quoted list price and they asked if I could guarantee supply. I told them if they sent me a PO, I'd personally call the factory to secure delivery. Four hours later, I had a $600k full list price PO - over $300k in margin dollars. I hadn't even had time to research the company before I got paid - turned out they won a city testing contract for something like $20 million a month and they didn't even really have a functioning lab built.

The company I worked for at the time did about $50m a year in sales in the US - over the next three months myself and the rep from Chicago sold our entire manufacturing capacity for a year. I got my last comp check on it January 2022 and then I quit lol.

6

pxmpxmpxmpxm t1_j9zf0hh wrote

>> they won a city testing contract for something like $20 million a month and they didn't even really have a functioning lab built

>
>Shocker, some new company with zero assets magically wins a huge government contract. Keep an eye out for FBI charging both the company and the politician that was running the bidding process.

1

Jimmy_kong253 t1_j9h064h wrote

Someone made a lot of money at the taxpayers expense

5

upnflames t1_j9hmo7w wrote

I personally know a 26 year old lab consumable sales rep that made $700k in commission on one sale in 2020. Didn't do anything wrong, just woke up one day with a $35 million dollar order from NYC and a straightforward, uncapped comp plan.

11

monkeysandmicrowaves t1_j9i8khy wrote

What kind of fucked-up hypercapitalist mindset are people in that they feel the need to treat everything as an investment? These were emergency medical supplies. What the fuck did you expect, to turn around and sell them for a profit after the pandemic was over?

5

[deleted] t1_j9gf0iz wrote

[deleted]

3

upnflames t1_j9hn6h6 wrote

Medical plastics expire - two year shelf life on most things. It's not that the item isn't good anymore, it's that the packaging degrades and so it can't be certified sterile. It could theoretically be repackaged and sterilized again (they use gamma irradiation for this stuff), but that's probably more expensive than it's worth.

5

mp90 t1_j9goew1 wrote

It's almost as if needs change and perceived value changes as well...

3

Eriosyces t1_j9gudna wrote

Never let a good crisis go to waste

2

wmanningiv t1_j9i1g10 wrote

We just got a literal pallet of city surplus covid tests delivered unprompted to my job site the other week. A little late in the game, but not complaining.

2

muderphudder t1_j9k9380 wrote

The nation has spent trillions on maintenance of the nuclear arsenal without any tactical use since 1945. Dollars and cents aren't always the most important part of the calculation.

2

threelegcatkungfu t1_j9gdvos wrote

Not even pennies to the dollar. Fractions of a penny.

1

StuckInNY t1_j9hgelf wrote

I noticed hundreds of unused Covid tests in large garbage bags outside of a school the other day waiting to be picked up.

1

Darkwoodz t1_j9hihza wrote

The people who made these deals should be investigated

0

RichieCunningham t1_j9iarla wrote

Is this a legit news source? I’ve never seen this website before

0

[deleted] t1_j9fu7ic wrote

[removed]

−33

down_up__left_right t1_j9fv6c5 wrote

>far for damage than COVID ever could have done.

Over a million Americans have died from Covid.

29

OfWhomIAmChief t1_j9gfaet wrote

Now do opioid overdose

−1

Turbulent_Link1738 t1_j9gkuvo wrote

That’s because of the drastic measures. If nothing was done and life continued I’d wager 100,000,000 Americans would have died. It got to a point where 3000 Americans were dying daily.

1

ifiwereaplatypus t1_j9hrpol wrote

Are opioid overdoses resulting in so many people dying that the hospital morgues were full and bodies were placed out on the hospital streets in like freezer trucks? Because that’s what COVID was in 2020 when we went into shut down.

1

lantonas t1_j9iqf6t wrote

Is that why field hospitals at SUNY Stony Brook, SUNY Old Westbury, and Westchester County Center closed in May of 2020 without seeing a single patient?

For a cost of $320,976,632, plus whatever it cost to tear them down.

0

[deleted] t1_j9fvzlk wrote

[removed]

−34

Karrick t1_j9fws4m wrote

Lol dude if you died from a heart condition that was exacerbated because of covid, covid is absolutely responsible. If you died because you didn't get care because the hospitals were overwhelmed and you had to wait for emergency care, covid was responsible. If you had a scheduled procedure cancelled and your condition worsened to the point you died because of it, covid was responsible.

You can fuck all the way off with your bullshit hairsplitting. Excess deaths are still way up and covid is responsible.

18

lantonas t1_j9iqkhd wrote

If you died in a car accident while going to purchase a COVID test, COVID was responsible.

0

down_up__left_right t1_j9fwr5b wrote

Or we can look at the excess deaths when compared to years before the pandemic.

Just in 2020 alone:

>Between March 1, 2020, and January 2, 2021, the US experienced 2,801,439 deaths, 22.9% more than expected, representing 522,368 excess deaths

It's possible that the official covid count is actually an under count as any people that died without being tested for covid are kept out of it even if they did have covid.

15

drakanx t1_j9h5sbh wrote

Unlikely...more likely an overcount as they counted people who died with covid as covid deaths.

0

down_up__left_right t1_j9h8qd3 wrote

>Unlikely...more likely

You're asserting this based on your gut feelings?

Looking at the excess deaths for just 2020 and the total covid death count it would not shock me if the covid death counts were actually under counted.

3

down_up__left_right t1_j9hcp9f wrote

An opinion piece?

You realize that's no more authoritative than anyone else's opinion right? They put opinion in big letters at the top to make that clear.

But okay let's look the piece:

>But are these Americans dying from covid or with covid?

The piece doesn't say anything definitive and just asks the question.

3

nydutch t1_j9fygjb wrote

Jimmy, are you lying about your dick, too?

12