Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Amon213 t1_jb1masw wrote

Arm women to stop rapes.

Arm women to stop rapes.

Arm women to stop rapes.

−100

Rottimer t1_jb1xzmw wrote

Interesting idea. I'm sure that there evidence that lax gun regulations are associated with lower rates of forcible rape. Let's compare Texas to NY.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/232563/forcible-rape-rate-in-the-us-by-state/

Holy shit, Texas has nearly twice the per capita forcible rape incidents as liberal gun grabbing NY state. Maybe arming everyone isn't the answer.

66

1AngryBrotha t1_jb20ayw wrote

What percentage of victims in TX have a CCP?

−22

Rottimer t1_jb215is wrote

You don't need CCP in Texas any longer to carry concealed. Regardless, that sounds like victim blaming, because even Texas, you need to choose to carry a weapon. It's almost like you're blaming those victims for being raped if they didn't have a CCP.

18

zjl539 t1_jb2rtiw wrote

disagree with op, but it’s not victim blaming to say something could have been prevented

−2

1AngryBrotha t1_jb21jgi wrote

I'm not blaming victims, I just think the correlation you're drawing is spurious.

−14

Amon213 t1_jb1y55f wrote

So what is?

−27

Rottimer t1_jb20mbj wrote

To reduce rapes in this city/state/country? A tremendous amount of money to fund social investment that would take years to see the results of. So nothing that politicians or most American voters are willing to do.

6

Amon213 t1_jb24frm wrote

What social investments are we lacking to stop rapes?

2

BlairClemens3 t1_jb1nx2k wrote

Someone stronger can wrest the gun away. If more women carried firearms, I think it would result in more women being killed.

43

Natural-Intention334 t1_jb1s0gt wrote

This is like arming teachers to stop school shootings

28

Amon213 t1_jb1sdd1 wrote

No. This is giving women a chance at defending themselves because the police can't protect them.

−7

cheetah611 t1_jb1s8mx wrote

This doesn't seem like a logical solution whatsoever. You're suggesting we give a tax funded firearm to every woman in NYC to prevent rape? The number of thefts, shootings, etc is going to skyrocket. Not only are you introducing about 2 million firearms into Manhattan alone, you're also giving them to untrained females who are going to be packing them on their person everyday.

Paid for courses + firearm is going to be in the vicinity of $550 per person, or $1,210,000,000 to arm the 2.2m+ females between 20-55 years old in Manhattan alone (not even taking BK or others into account). And I absolutely guarantee a massive number will end up in the hands of thieves who will now see every female as an opportunity to get their hands on a firearm registered in someone else's name.

Not even going to start on the statistics around household deaths and suicides when a firearm is introduced.

12

Amon213 t1_jb1slec wrote

What is your solution?

−6

cheetah611 t1_jb1u3t0 wrote

Not arming every woman in NYC that's for sure.

17

Amon213 t1_jb1udb2 wrote

Good plan. So the rapes continue.

−9

Scroto-Saggins t1_jb1w0fh wrote

Right. Welcome to New York enjoy your 4k a month studio you're working 80 hour weeks to afford also the crime is really bad and we will do very little to deter or prevent it in fact we will release most of them the very same day no legal fire arms though sorry.

−12

Amon213 t1_jb1wjd6 wrote

I've been here my whole life. I proposed a solution. Everyone else disagreed without offering an alternative.

0

cheetah611 t1_jb2602j wrote

You offered a terrible solution, didn't acknowledge my counter argument in any way, and expected me to solve all rape in a city which is arguable safer per person than most of america.

Rape has been happening for thousands of years. Doesn't make it ok, but the solution isn't something as easy as give people guns lol. Sure, rape goes down while violent armed crime and shootings absolutely skyrocket. Problem solved though, right?

14

Amon213 t1_jb26ivg wrote

You offered no solution. Just a critique. Congrats on pointing out my solution wasn't perfect. I never said it was.

−1

cheetah611 t1_jb27ip8 wrote

Honestly I've been trying to put it as nicely as possible, but your "solution" isn't just not perfect, it's idiotic and would increase all manners of crime, accidental deaths, suicides, and domestic violence in the city.

If you wanted a discussion than you could have acknowledged any point of my initial criticism and reflected back on your proposed solution rather than a smart ass "wElL wHaT wOuLD yOu Do". I'm not here trying to solve rape, but I saw a stupid suggested which you clearly thought was somewhat viable and shot it down (nicely at first). If you want an intelligent discussion, start with an intelligent comment.

11

Amon213 t1_jb285d6 wrote

You have no solution. Just critiques and then stand in your alleged intelligence as rapes happen. Good job, champ. How's that?

−2

cheetah611 t1_jb294nn wrote

Lmao I just told you I didn't offer a solution because that wasn't my intent when responding to you. But fine.

Stop arresting people for non-violent drug crimes, pardon those currently incarcerated for such crimes (roughly 44% of those in a US prison are for drug crimes). That should significantly reduce NY's current prison overpopulation problem - the primary reason we have the whole arrest and release thing occurring for even violent crimes and known criminals.

Now that there are open jail cells, actually arrest and hold violent criminals. Increase the bail requirements for those crimes, remove bail for repeat offenders. Now NY criminals have something to fear when it comes to booking in NYC, violent crimes (including rape) are significantly reduced, and the overall impact is a few more potheads and people doing blow on the streets. I'd say worth it.

8

Amon213 t1_jb2a9qq wrote

Now you're moving the goalposts. We're not discussing reducing incarcerations or prison population. We're discussing rapes and prevention. Can you stay focused? Now while I agree with what you said it won't reduce crimes.

−2

cheetah611 t1_jb2bu8b wrote

Yeah ok I'm done here lol. Idk if you have an inability to actually absorb information, but re-read what I said.

The reason rape and violent crimes keep happening is because NYC has a habit of releasing and re-releasing repeat offenders and violent criminals. The reason that happens is because we have a prison overpopulation problem in the state. Most rapes aren't done by someone with a spotless criminal record.

Keeping violent criminals in prison, and having them actually fear the NYC justice system WILL reduce rape. Christ I feel like I'm debating a wall lol. Have fun, I'm done here

9

Scroto-Saggins t1_jb1wsx4 wrote

Idk I live in Georgia were we have full constitutional carry. I have 3 fire arms in my closet. I'm a guy though so I'm not too worried about someone following me into my apartment and raping me but my point is I've never killed anyone or even shot anyone.

−4

cheetah611 t1_jb25ot5 wrote

https://www.bestplaces.net/crime/?city1=53651000&city2=51304000

Georgia has a higher violent and property crime rate per person than New York.

I'm not anti-gun, but to propose arming half the population isn't a solution.

11

Scroto-Saggins t1_jb271jr wrote

Well I live in a nice area atleast that is for Atlanta not Georgia my guy

−1

cheetah611 t1_jb29uvc wrote

Yeah the stats aren't easy to capture specific areas. Problem with that is Georgia's population density is so much lower that a "nice area" is out of the way. NYC, and any other densely populated city be it NYC or London, the "nice areas" aren't only prohibitively expensive, they're still not that far away from the not so nice areas.

My initial point being, arming half the population as the original commenter suggested, is really really stupid and incredibly dangerous.

1

Amon213 t1_jb1xawl wrote

From my experience 90% of people or so run at the sight of a weapon even when they have numbers.

4

Scroto-Saggins t1_jb1xgya wrote

I hope I don't have to find out but I've seen fire arms escalate situations also I think you only pull it out when it's time to shoot.

4

73577357 t1_jb23vrj wrote

I don't totally understand why business people can get guns more easily because they handle money but individuals who are frequently targeted aren't able to get a gun to protect themselves. Money is valued more than your life. Businesses have insurance. NYC pretends all the laws are about safety of the greater good, but it's really about privileges for the wealthy and powerful. Criminals will get guns illegally or just use knives. If you have a door man or private security you're going to be safer, only poorer people have to worry.

1