Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Solid-Discussion-708 t1_jdl46nw wrote

The public will not come back to mass transit given a choice of arriving to their destination uninjured and still alive by another means of transportation. Just the same as they are now leaving NYC for somewhere else that offers them, and their families, more safety in their lives. This city has made this error in judgement before. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

−62

ketzal7 t1_jdln1ap wrote

The subway needs to expand it’s lines in Queens farther East (7, F, E, J) and upzone next to those stops.

Also, real BRT with dedicated lanes should be a thing in this city already.

63

Pbpopcorn t1_jdm6nyx wrote

It’s not just a matter of increasing service. It’s also a matter of keeping the trains and stations clean and increasing safety and accessibility. And in this post-pandemic world many people will continue wfh or hybrid schedules reducing the need to take daily public transit

38

Pbpopcorn t1_jdmc87o wrote

I take the express bus to work (Bronx) now. I could never go back to taking the subway daily. Way too much riff raff and non sense. And as a small Asian woman I make sure to carry pepper spray when I do take the subway because I’ve never felt completely safe taking it alone in the Bronx since 2020 after dealing with racial harassment (even got the guy arrested thankfully) Edit: Bring on the downvotes -especially from all you white privileged Manhattanites!

1

Parking_Goal_3301 t1_jdmc9ad wrote

That is absolutely ridiculous. I drove into Manhattan recently because it was a complex day where I needed to make multiple stops for work outside and inside the 5 boroughs and there was no realistic way to do it without the car.

It made me appreciate my normal Metro North commute so much. It’s a fantastic and sane way to travel.

10

cty_hntr t1_jdmh5lj wrote

NYC subways were all built to bring people to Manhattan. We need more interborough, where you don't have to go into Manhattan to get to another borough (say Brooklyn to Queens, or Bronx to Queens).

77

Solid-Discussion-708 t1_jdmo9sv wrote

Your article is old, from 2022, and it's opinion that talks about only homicide. Crime can be more commonly about assaults, muggings, stabbings, and rapes, for example. Remember that police are literally running out the door every week. That means fewer police on the job today than the article publish date. Now look up those historical stats.

0

CactusBoyScout t1_jdmpbh4 wrote

The bus system in general is such a missed opportunity.

The fact that it mostly follows the same routes from before WWII and the buses mostly stay within one borough is just myopic.

Every area that doesn’t have direct train service to Manhattan should have a bus service that goes straight there instead of just taking people to the nearest train. Like why shouldn’t you be able to get on a bus in Red Hook and go straight to Manhattan without transferring to a train? Or a bus straight from the Navy Yard to Manhattan? And yeah use dedicated BRT lanes at every choke point (bridges tunnels).

22

PostPostMinimalist t1_jdmrl5m wrote

You think 2022 is “old”?

Most crime stats are down year over year (murder, robbery, rape… ). But you’ll probably say they’re fake even though they track closely with the murder rate.

And NYC is very safe per capita in those stats too, one of the lowest rates in the country.

And historical stats? Crime is way lower than it used to be. We’re around mid-2010s levels how terrifying

5

Solid-Discussion-708 t1_jdmzzxy wrote

Your information isn't accurate. I don't declare anything fake. The uninformed assume as part of their argument. NYPD just released year over year as of Jan 23 stats. Overall index crime is up 1.4% and felony assault is up 14.9%. Anytime someone is actually victimized is, in fact, terrifying. Just ask the victim. That's different than keyboard declarations that are just, false.

−2

Vin879 t1_jdn098o wrote

If you fix it*, they will come back: put the funds into safety, cleanliness, station maintenance, reduced transit disruptions/interruptions. We want our fares to be worth it

2

UpperLowerEastSide t1_jdn0pch wrote

In this post pandemic world with some people doing wfh or a hybrid schedule a big way to increase transit ridership is upzoning near both buses and subways. Especially neighborhoods like Greenwich Village that are well to do and have constructed little housing

4

CactusBoyScout t1_jdn1213 wrote

As long as we’re rethinking transit to LaGuardia, why shouldn’t we get a bus from Brooklyn to LGA? When you’re dealing with luggage, a single-seat ride (meaning no transfers) should be the goal.

There’s a bus that goes all the way from Bed-Stuy to JFK and it already has the AirTrain. Manhattan has the M60.

5

PostPostMinimalist t1_jdn1yxw wrote

Oh look it's called "moving the goalposts" with a side of cherry-picking.

You shifted to picking one area where it's up (though trending down) and stopped talking about the others (murder, rape, etc.) where it's down to a greater extent. If we're talking about transit crime (closest to the subject of this post) it's down 13% yoy.

https://compstat.nypdonline.org/2e5c3f4b-85c1-4635-83c6-22b27fe7c75c/view/89

3

ffzero58 t1_jdn2x9y wrote

Frequency and reliability is what keeps them coming back. The IBX is slowly becoming a reality, even though its just LRT but its better than nothing.

100% on BRT, they really need to seriously look into true BRT setups rather than just painting lanes. Without enforcement, people don't give a shit and will double park.

9

mowotlarx t1_jdn709c wrote

One thing I'll never understand is the MTAs insistence that we need to get back to where we were in 2019. Subways we're a fucking nightmare. Cars were packed, trains were insanely delayed by people packing in. I never want to go back to that. It is a terrible way to run a transit system. The goal shouldn't be sardining as many people as possible...

9

iv2892 t1_jdng4qa wrote

This would be a game changer , Manhattan and to a big extent any other part of any borough, including the north shore of Staten Island , all have great access to public transit . But once you go deeper into the other boroughs is start to get a little more difficult . Is still accessible , but it takes too long to go from south Brooklyn to Astoria , the Bronx , and many other places

3

TizonaBlu t1_jdnh500 wrote

It’s really sad that New Yorkers think that having no murders and robbery in the subway is not “real life”, whereas that’s the reality in almost all developed world. Kinda reminds me of the gun debate where Americans think it’s “impossible” to prevent.

7

spk92986 t1_jdnkjx6 wrote

It's not what I think, it's real life whether anyone likes it or not. You can be an idealist all you want but we don't live in a utopia and no major city is free of violent crime, certainly not this one.

1

TizonaBlu t1_jdnlwej wrote

Again, the Stockholm syndrome New Yorkers have that think murders and robberies in the subway is “utopia”.

Let me tell you, a single murder or robbery happening in SG, SK, JP, TW, HK, subway would be an avenger level event where the news will cover it nonstop and politicians will be forced to apologize. In NY, it’s Tuesday.

9

iv2892 t1_jdnqcw8 wrote

I agree 100%, is beneficial for both the employers and employees . The only people that unfortunately lose in this transactions are business owners near office areas.

1

Daurdabla t1_jdnsn6e wrote

Yet here I am, rather living in a country where I wouldn’t get murdered or robbed in the subway. Or imagine this, American society but with safe subway! But I respect your inability to dream big.

7

Griffin808 t1_jdnvc35 wrote

I'm sorry but expanding this shit show is not the answer. There is a signal failure on the F/E line ever other day that fucks the whole system up. I don't understand how signals work or why this seems to be a never ending problem that can't be fixed. But keep the shiny new trains and actually have a system that can run trains on a timely basis. It is ridiculous to tell the public that the system is worth it when every day there are countless things going wrong with it.

−3

iv2892 t1_jdnyyym wrote

That was a bad period for sure and some of them were provoked altercations between two or more people . Millions ride it daily and the overall safety has improved since then . Is not 100% sure , nothing is really. But definitely one of the safe method of transportation

0

UpperLowerEastSide t1_jdp5zy0 wrote

For bus operators to hit 45-55mph on bus lanes, they'd have to be grade separated like the Orange or Silver Line in LA. Which means for NY they'd have to be elevated. For some of the bus lines, would probably be better to convert them into els at that point.

1

UpperLowerEastSide t1_jdp6n0h wrote

The easiest way to do this would be to merge the B57 with the Q33 since the B57 would already be going to Jackson Heights. Then you get a one seat ride from Downtown Brooklyn to LGA.

Since the MTA is currently redesigning the Brooklyn network I'd recommend you post a comment on their Brooklyn bus redesign map since they're accepting comments now.

1

DJSoggyFries t1_jdqk2sc wrote

It would be nice if my commute from the Bronx to Queens didn't take 1.5 hours each way. People living in well served areas don't understand that other areas have shitty commutes.

3

MasterInterface t1_jdqn5zu wrote

I wouldn't say it gets a little difficult. It gets a lot more difficult with multiple transfers. If you need to hit multiple destinations in a day that isn't along the way to each other, it becomes impossible.

1

TeamMisha t1_jdrq41o wrote

I remember the multiple surveys the MTA launched the past 1 to 2 years felt like they were pushing you to rank safety issues and the entire focus was safety, but for me it has never changed being about service and reliability. I don't care if every station has a cop in it, what I care about is waiting 12 minutes for an N or R train, or god forbid I need to travel on the weekends and waiting up to 20 minutes.

2

my5cent t1_jdtqfip wrote

Here is an idea. Majority of people take mass transit to Manhattan to work. During rush hour they should devote 3-4 lines going to Manhattan in the morning and 3 lines moving traffic out of Manhattan.

1

Pherring83 t1_je21qtt wrote

I know this is probably not #1 on the priority list but a Park Slope/Prospect Heights to Williamsburg/Bushwick type service would be well-used and potentially cut down on some of the BQE traffic.

2