KaiDaiz t1_jdyfb0n wrote
Reply to comment by mowotlarx in New Yorkers overwhelmingly support bail changes ahead of state budget deadline: Poll by Grass8989
judge, the jury....then let it go to trial....we arent even reaching that phase. we stuck arguing x is missing out of umpteen docs and want to toss entire case pretrial. you think that's fair? we are literally arguing at the pregame phase over someone the team don't even plan to put in the game
mowotlarx t1_jdyisxn wrote
>you think that's fair
Yes. Because defendants have a right to see evidence in a case against them. The courts shouldn't be a trial mill. These are people's lives we are judging. And I certainly don't think we should trust a prosecutor to judge what evidence is valuable or not to the defense.
KaiDaiz t1_jdyl1k5 wrote
what evidence used against them? said missing piece not even called as a witness/evidence against the accused....there's a reason why it wasn't collected the first place and presented to court in timely manner...no one care for it...it was not important to case and not plan to use against accused
mowotlarx t1_jdzklsh wrote
It was not important to the prosecution. That doesn't mean it's not important to the defense. Given the track record of prosecutors withholding evidence from the defense, I would never trust the word of a prosecutor on what is relevant or not.
KaiDaiz t1_je014a1 wrote
how is it important for the defense for statements for someone not even present at the crime/incident? seriously running circles...its only important bc they can claim failure to dot the I to toss entire case.
again...something like this shouldn't toss the entire case since entire prosecution not based on it. let it go to trial, let the jury decide? whats the fear? you get your day in court same with the people vs tossing things on technicality. just don't allow it as evidence against the accused...that's the fair approach. but nope...dolts like you think otherwise
ephemeraljelly t1_jdyj0nq wrote
the defense team should still have the opportunity to view it. again, as someone whose responsibility it was to collect logbooks, its not difficult. it takes like a minute at most to send
KaiDaiz t1_je03aon wrote
defense don't even use it. they only care its missing. its minutes x other cases and things folks have to do. its mindless busywork for nothing and simple things like this missed shouldn't tank the entire case since entire case not built on this one piece.
ephemeraljelly t1_je03q6q wrote
its not up for you to decide whether the information is useful or not. i now work in defense and every piece of information is important, even if you dont think so
KaiDaiz t1_je04i61 wrote
then let the jury and judge decide when case goes to trial...you as defense using it as a excuse to toss entire case before trial over things you know is useless
you simply afraid of it going to trial and using any excuse to prevent it. go to trial argue how important x was not turn over...go ahead lets see if you do
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments