Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Open-Abbreviations18 t1_isvotnw wrote

This is a silly thought. There's a LOT of parking by Citi Field. Why not put some housing on the parking lots adjacent to the subway station? This is no way all that parking is necessary.

7

TonyzTone t1_isvp2a8 wrote

Because it was vociferously protested against just a few years ago because it's public land and thus, should remain public for the benefit of the Mets not private for the benefit of the citizens of New York.

14

Open-Abbreviations18 t1_isvpsr3 wrote

Yes it's public land so it should be used for some mixed use developments, not for some baseball team whose fans mostly take the LIRR and subway to go to anyways.

4

-Tony t1_isw06pg wrote

The park lot can often get filled, they also use that land to generate a ton of revenue for the city and the park.

It’s also built on a swamp, you’re not building much there.

2

Open-Abbreviations18 t1_iswa3zj wrote

Isn't Willets Point also build on a swamp? Yet it's being built up without too much concern in that regard.

3

Fresh720 t1_isxxu5t wrote

More green space can help against flooding and drainage issues. I think a giant field of green would be more beneficial than a parking lot imo

1

TeamMisha t1_isyio8b wrote

As another poster mentioned there is some arcane ruling/law about the parking lot being public land, Citi Field owners want to transform a lot of it but are roadblocked. I think that's where they wanted to put a soccer stadium at one point.

1