Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

sundaysarelikethat t1_ix08ka2 wrote

how the hell is her soho loft $1287 a month? My tiny east village apartment was going for $2000 in 2007

119

Johnnadawearsglasses t1_ix0gxq7 wrote

I mean it has to be rent controlled. I can tell you that this building was truly awful until the past few years. There was a Chinese produce wholesaler who operated out of the bottom floor. Every morning at like 2-4 am there were dudes working on the sidewalk organizing produce and yelling at each other. When they left each day, produce had fallen all over, attracting only the most discriminating rats. The maintenance on the building appeared to be zero. I would walk by it most days and wonder why. That there must be rent controlled units in part of the building explains that to me now. Landlords are notorious for letting rent controlled and rent stabilized buildings rot.

104

queensnyatty t1_ix0pjqp wrote

Geez who could have predicted that? If only there were a social science that studied this sort of thing.

30

tonka737 t1_ix10ofj wrote

How long would it take to recoup the costs of renovating a rent controlled apartment when accounting for monthly expenses?

−1

mdervin t1_ix0dv18 wrote

Because she moved there in 1984 when it was nothing, laying the foundation for what Soho is today.

You are a late stage gentrifier.

If you want a cheap apartment in a hot neighborhood, be born in the early 1960's.

−29

sundaysarelikethat t1_ix0el32 wrote

Where are you getting that she moved there in 1984?

Article said she lived there since 2007 and if you google her name it says shes 51 which means she would have been 13 in 1984

54

[deleted] t1_ix0nf7t wrote

They pulled it right out of their ass. Couldn't you tell by the condescending attitude and backhanded insult?

49

Frankiesales_ t1_ix0gck3 wrote

rent was also cheaper in 2007

2

sundaysarelikethat t1_ix0inr7 wrote

I know, I was here, and my rent was $2,000 in the east village and know for a fact that things were not cheaper than that in SoHo, let alone for a full floor loft

8

mdervin t1_ix0piro wrote

Soho wasn’t 1280 a month back in 2007.

7

huff_and_russ t1_iwzzyvk wrote

Unbelievable how NYC does literally nothing to non-cooperating mentally I’ll people to the expense of its citizens (including normal people and these poor insane people)

107

SnacksBooksNaps t1_ix1jnfq wrote

I am absolutely disgusted that these innocent creatures were returned to that filth to spend their lives with a mentally ill health hazard such as their "owner" who will no doubt cause some of their deaths. We should all be aghast at this.

97

JerseyCity_Nuyorican t1_ix12tag wrote

She has numerous health problems that leave her too fatigued to clean but supposedly not fatigued enough for her to care for 9 dogs. I can't even....

91

icecreamangel t1_ix16zap wrote

How on earth did she get them back. The place looks disgusting and filthy, there’s no way she can take care of 9 dogs when her place looks like that.

51

cleanlaundry t1_ix22c6v wrote

I’ve never wanted to steal someone else’s pets more in my life

8

Timemaster88888 t1_ix2pi8q wrote

At her condition, she can only care for 1 dog but even that might be a challenge.

6

h8street t1_ix4bu4d wrote

What a gross living space. I mean, the dogs probably love it, but imagine the smell coming from that apartment.

2

iwantcookies2020 t1_ix6jvb6 wrote

She hasn’t paid rent in years how charming. No wonder she has $ to shop online 24/7

2

Ilovemytowm t1_ix7y125 wrote

Why does anyone pay rent It seems that squatters don't have to pay Jack s*** and get away with it. We all play by the rules and do what we're supposed to do and get f***** day in and day out and then there's people who just say go f*** yourself I'm not doing nothing and get away with it. I speak from experience as I have a family member who is terrorizing us and playing this game and says to me at least once a week there's nothing you can do to me.

Also I have a Mormon phone hence the asterix.

2

AutoModerator t1_iwzvlk7 wrote

Users often report submissions from this site and ask us to ban it for sensationalized articles. At /r/nyc, we oppose blanket banning any news source. Readers have a >responsibility to be skeptical, check sources and comment on any flaws. You can help improve this thread by linking to media that verifies or questions this article's claims. Your link could help readers better understand this issue. If you do find >evidence that this article or its title are false or misleading, contact the moderators who will review it.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

nixplix t1_ix6sxw1 wrote

Karma will handle this, as it does everything.

1

Sufficient-Soft-5118 t1_ix39fnv wrote

These farging ice-holes are just trying to make everywhere staggeringly out of the reach of people with a middle class salary.

Getting low key gentrification vibes from this crowd! What a disgusting thing to support!!

−4

bsanchey t1_ix16rka wrote

If only we had universal access to mental health services. She shouldn’t have to live like that

−6

RMR6789 t1_ix22q15 wrote

People that are this Ill typically refuse services. They are available.. the loophole is that the person who’s brain isn’t functioning has to agree to services or family has to go to court repeatedly to gain guardianship to forcibly medicate.

Source: personal experience.

24

andagainandagain- t1_ix2csp3 wrote

This. As someone who works in the healthcare sector in NYC (frequently with unhoused and mentally ill people), there actually are a fair amount of resources for low to no income people with mental illnesses. The issue is that many of them are too consumed by their illness to want to take advantage of said resources, and there’s no way to force them to.

12

RMR6789 t1_ix6e5oj wrote

It’s exhausting for families. So much red tape.

3

misanthpope t1_ix1xj7q wrote

It doesn't need to be universal for her to access it. She probably qualifies for medicaid in NY, which would be free for her then. If she makes too much money for that, she can try buying subsidized insurance. I think you're arguing for compulsory mental health services?

17