Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

thisismynewacct t1_iv0daej wrote

I wonder if the people irked by this are just hasidim? Non Hasidic Jews are frequently at odds with them and rarely agree. I wouldn’t be surprised if the latter would agree with the Times.

The author is trying to paint a picture that the Times has it out for Hasidim, pointing to their articles related to Hasidic education (he just refers to “Jewish education”, but in reality it’s just Hasidic), but it’s not like those articles are incorrect. There’s plenty of evidence supporting how Hasidic education is failing kids.

33

SolitaryMarmot t1_iv11h5q wrote

This. The vast majority of even conservative and orthodox Jews place huge value on education and it's role in the success of their children. I have many friends who grew up orthodox and many went to private and even Catholic schools if they were the best in the area.

Non-secular education is specific to certain branches of Hasidism and Haredi Judiasm. It's objectively terrible and gives no kids no choice about their role in the community later in life as they end up extremely dependent.

12

Yserbius t1_iv1kob2 wrote

Did you read the article? This isn't about education. This is about how the Al Sharpton supported anti-Semitic riot which killed three people in 1991 is being portrayed as a gang war between blacks and Hasidim.

The Times has had it out for Hasidim for far longer than the education controversy has been around. About five years ago, NYT made a big deal that they will start an effort to have their hiring practices reflect the diversity of New York City. When Jewish Twitter pointed out that this would mean they would have to hire 20-30 Hasidim and many more religious Jews, they simply stopped talking about it.

10

arrogant_ambassador OP t1_iv1ojpr wrote

Hasidim don’t meet the diversity criteria the times is interested in.

4

Obstinate_Turnip t1_iv55538 wrote

Isn't that simply a matter of the process by which racial categories were constructed by the government in the 1970's? David Bernstein has an extremely interesting book about this: Classified: The Untold Story of Racial Classification in America. South Asians and East Asians, who have little in common, were conflated as "Asian American." Jews specifically did not want to be in a category of their own: imagine the anti-Semitism that would result from accurate counts of Jews in academia, medicine, law, etc. Thus for purposes of government statistics, Jews are "white," along with other peoples with origins in the Middle East. If you're going to have diversity requirements for Hasidim, you would need to have such requirements for, say, the Welsh and Catalonians too.

2

creativepositioning t1_iv8pyar wrote

Bernstein is an insidious moron and a joke in the legal community and I promise you that has nothing to do with whatever he's saying about the Times. You probably didn't realize this, being a Bernstein fan, but it's clear the Times recognizes Jews as a racial category. The point was they don't recognize Hasidim.

1

thisismynewacct t1_iv1zd66 wrote

You’re right, it doesn’t, which is why it was weird for this articles author to bring it up.

2

Yserbius t1_iv26cja wrote

It's in the context of the general anti-religious Jew trend that the Grey Lady has had since forever. But your comment about how "just hasidim are irked by this" is flat out wrong. For one, Algemeiner is a secular Jewish paper that frequently publishes anti-Hasidic content itself.

2

prisoner_007 t1_iv2iyx9 wrote

Why is the article quoting from a heritage foundation sponsored opinion site?

2

LostSoulNothing t1_iv2pzo1 wrote

Because it's not a news article. It's an opinion piece by a right-wing pundit

2

creativepositioning t1_iv8pn2y wrote

You kinda skip over everything he said about their reporting of the riot...

I'm not a hasidic jew, but I certainly see the point he's making about the language the Times used and their characterization of the riot. Did you know that the Times tried to cover up the holocaust?

1

arrogant_ambassador OP t1_iv0mjww wrote

I don’t think misrepresenting the crown heights riots has anything to do with Hasidic education.

−3

thisismynewacct t1_iv0pgbm wrote

You’re right which is why it was odd that the author of your article brought it up as some way to paint the Times

15

arrogant_ambassador OP t1_iv0qgk5 wrote

There’s a clear bias here concerning the way the times covers Hasidic education, but that doesn’t mean the article is without merit.

−5

_kalebb_ t1_iv0uf36 wrote

The NYtimes frequently does exposes about corruption in the local education system and municipal government, how is doing the same about hasidism bias?

14

BringMeInfo t1_iv10tzx wrote

I think they were saying the article has a bias against the Times, but the article still has merit.

2

Rottimer t1_iv1579r wrote

  1. I think “misrepresenting” is too strong of a word when it comes to the riots.

  2. The author is clearly upset about the recent very accurate coverage of the corruption in many Hasidic schools receiving state, city, and federal funds.

2

arrogant_ambassador OP t1_iv1ogj5 wrote

I don’t think it is. It was definitely more one sided in terms of Black people assaulting Jewish people.

2

OutrageousGarbage743 t1_iv20dsg wrote

Yeah ok….

0

arrogant_ambassador OP t1_iv2q7fn wrote

Yeah ok. Show me facts to the contrary.

4