Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

MurrayPloppins t1_iy5dtiq wrote

Close! Unions of employees working for me as a business owner are good, because the only person who suffers from that situation is me, and everyone in the union benefits. But you replace “me” in that arrangement with the general (tax paying) public, then the benefit to the union members has the potential to be entirely offset by the detriment to everyone else. And, to the point of the guy I replied to originally, the public has the choice to change policy on public labor if needed.

3

NetQuarterLatte t1_iy5gi0h wrote

>Unions of employees working for me as a business owner are good, because the only person who suffers from that situation is me, and everyone in the union benefits.

Your employees can just quit and find a better job, no?

That's what they do with government jobs, for example:

>Among larger agencies, vacancy rates were highest at the Department of Buildings, at 24.2% (489 vacancies), the Department of Health at 19.1% (1,189 vacancies) and the Department of Social Services at 17.3% (2,256 openings).

https://www.thecity.nyc/2022/9/6/23340069/health-housing-buildings-public-sector-unemployment-rate-high

​

>But you replace “me” in that arrangement with the general (tax paying) public, then the benefit to the union members has the potential to be entirely offset by the detriment to everyone else.

How so? You seem to be framing unions as a strictly zero-sum thing.

​

>And, to the point of the guy I replied to originally, the public has the choice to change policy on public labor if needed.

If this sub is any indicator, our government would only employ people at minimum wages and fire people at a whim. Like https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-oped-20221111-hihcpddocrfb3jq6toftxj5nee-story.html

1