Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

wefarrell t1_iwln0di wrote

1

kanooker OP t1_iwlnafw wrote

What would keep him in jail if he was only charged with State charges? He has no prior gun charges. There does need to be a dangerousness standard. I say this as a progressive.

2

[deleted] t1_iwmxmvb wrote

[deleted]

0

kanooker OP t1_iwmyumu wrote

Well maybe conservatives should focus on that one part instead of the whole law and you can change minds but they'd rather go scorched earth because it's a better political strategy for a power grab.

A conservative governor in NJ did it. Why can't they?

0

drpvn t1_iwnerih wrote

Better yet, rather than rant about what conservatives do, you should write or call your state senator or assemblyperson and say that you believe there should be a dangerousness standard. Let them know that their progressive constituents disagree with them on this so they don’t just assume it’s only conservatives who feel that way.

0

kanooker OP t1_iwnfs3b wrote

Better yet stop playing games and do the same with your law makers.

0

drpvn t1_iwo0u4q wrote

I do. You’re a bit odd.

1

wefarrell t1_iwloze8 wrote

Right, jail should be used to protect the rest of society from potentially dangerous individuals while they wait for trial.

It should not be used as a means of punishing people before they are convicted of a crime.

−1

kanooker OP t1_iwlp507 wrote

So there should be a dangerousness standard right? Because if there wasn't he'd be out on bail.

3