Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

BigLittleWolfCat t1_iyjavsn wrote

Reply to comment by ghiaab_al_qamaar in unleashed, unneutered pitbull on side walk of business by [deleted]

This has nothing to do with the breeds, but the humans using and abusing them, and targeting those breeds for dogfights and other aggressive “jobs”. Any dog breed would be a danger in that case. Humans filled with hate and lack of education, like yourself and Thot-face, kills far more people every year. Gonna clutch your pearls over that too, Karen?

−1

ghiaab_al_qamaar t1_iyjbdkd wrote

Calm down my man. You seem to have an irrational attachment to this breed. All I’m doing is showing why people rightfully distrust the breed.

In fact, I agree that they were bred to be dangerous. That’s why they can snap, even if I’m loving families. An inherently dangerous dog breed should be, logically, treated as dangerous.

3

BigLittleWolfCat t1_iyjbsji wrote

Oh I’m calm. I’m not the one getting my panties in a twist over uneducated hysteria. I’m actually calmly snuggling next to a loving pit, who’s big spooning a toddler while snoring happily. OOOOUUUUUHHH!

1

ghiaab_al_qamaar t1_iyjcd6l wrote

Your anecdote =/= the end of the story.

Or do you not believe the news stories on dozens of people per year who are murdered by pits? You can read through them at your leisure as I provided sources.

0

BigLittleWolfCat t1_iyje733 wrote

I believe news stories alright. Do you believe news stories about humans doing awful things? My point being, this breed is being picked up and mistreated by awful humans (the most dangerous breed of all) and thus there are understandably more cases with them. If abusers decided on poodles or labs some day, then they’d be in the news instead. Regardless, you seem like you’d rather focus on whatever fits your narrative than common sense, so good luck with that I guess. I’ll continue with empathy and love, you do you

2

ghiaab_al_qamaar t1_iyjepwk wrote

> comes into thread claiming pit bulls are nice and loving

> ignores the person providing statistics and news articles

> says that person is “focusing on whatever fits [their] narrative instead of common sense”

This is your brain on pit bulls.

0

BigLittleWolfCat t1_iyjfdeu wrote

LMAO are you alright? I’m not “ignoring” statistics and news articles. They are just a small part of a much bigger picture. I actually acknowledged them, and counter pointed them. Unlike your tactic to just yell bloody murder and hope that “loud=right”

You decide to cling on to a few facts you dig up that you can pile on that sad, sad hill you decided to die on.

This is your brain on fear-mongering

1