Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Johnnadawearsglasses t1_iyjc01r wrote

Good to see the pitbull lobby show up. It's like they word search for pitbull 100x a day and conveniently show up in every sub with their stories of their sweet "pitty" who is kinder than little baby Jesus in a bassinet. Lmao

−1

mowotlarx t1_iyjco8r wrote

Good to see the anti-pitbull lobby show up. It's like the word search for pitbull 100x a day and conveniently show up in every sub with their stories of pitbull maulings of little baby Jesus in his basinnet. Lmao.

Both groups are deranged and obsessed, if you ask me.

1

Unusual_Ferret_6894 t1_iyjgkz6 wrote

Internet weirdos: “I hate all pitbulls with a passion and weirdly cannot stop talking about it”

Pitbull owners: “that’s fuckin weird. You’re weird.”

You: “pitbull owners are the problem”

Fuckin weirdos.

0

Johnnadawearsglasses t1_iyjiziy wrote

Out in full force. Even on a removed post. Nice.

Hope the pay is good

Edit - OMG. 10 of the 49 comments here are you. You really should be more subtle.

0

[deleted] OP t1_iyjjayn wrote

[deleted]

0

Johnnadawearsglasses t1_iyjklnt wrote

I don’t have access to your form 1099 so I couldn’t say. I don’t hate any animal, btw. But I also don’t support people having animals in an irresponsible way. You wouldn’t have a chimpanzee as a house pet. Or a Lion as a guard animal. Nor should you keep a breed with an overwhelmingly disproportionate share of deadly and serious safety incidents if you are a layperson. You should require licensing similar to any other activity that impacts public safety. The major impediment to that is the pit bull advocacy groups who misrepresent the statistics and try to gaslight anyone who disagrees with them. I personally don’t care if your “pitty” is sweet and nicer than any human. Any more than I care that someone who owns an AK-47 is a kind and caring person.

0