Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Lurnmoshkaz t1_j0velwe wrote

Other than the fact that it's not 24/7, London's metro and bus infrastructure is way better than New York's. I'd say comparing to European standards, New York is pretty mediocre. Downright bad if you're Swiss or Dutch.

Outdated tech. Tons of delays/cancelled trains. Super, super super fucking dirty, and certainly not as expansive (super dense connections in Manhattan and downtown Brooklyn and queens, but non-existent in areas like deep queens like Bayside or fresh Meadows, Staten island and so on).

New York's public transportation is only impressive if your standards are American.

4

snowbeast93 t1_j0vj95h wrote

NYC has the most stations of any network in the world lol

More and more lines are getting CBTC with automated trains, similar to London

NYC has more accessible stations than London, not to mention all of our stations and rolling stock feature level boarding, which is not true of the tube

I think you’re heavily biased against NYC. Fine to have criticisms, but I think some of your critiques are overstated. For example, South London is famously underserved by the Underground just like parts of the outer boroughs, and I truly believe that the dirtiness of the subway is blown completely out of proportion. We also have newer trains, and all of them feature air conditioning. Ever been on a deep level tube train in the summer? It’s hell

2

Arleare13 t1_j0w2j33 wrote

Paris still has multiple lines where you have to manually open the train door at stations. But no, outdated tech is a uniquely American issue, apparently.

0

Arleare13 t1_j0vfygh wrote

I'm sorry that us ignorant Americans have such low standards compared to you enlightened Europeans.

1