Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

OrphanDad t1_j0uv28x wrote

That’s nuts, just 20 years for murdering someone?

38

elizabeth-cooper t1_j0uxsay wrote

They let him plead guilty to manslaughter, which is a lesser charge.

8

OrphanDad t1_j0uy4f1 wrote

I understand that was the plea deal, but it seems fucked up. Like what about this case would’ve been hard to prove in trial?

13

BaizuoStateOfMind OP t1_j0vbq15 wrote

The prosecutor would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the attacker meant to kill her, not just attack her.

Plus, trials are a huge expense and Covid created a massive backlog. The DA’s office has no time to try cases.

10

oreosfly t1_j0vuxjt wrote

Most cases end in pleas rather than trial. There is no such thing as a “slam dunk case”. DAs don’t want to face political blowback for losing “easy” cases (see OJ Simpson and Gil Garcetti), defendants don’t want to stare down the barrel of life in prison without parole.

That being said, 20 years for a 33 year old for murder is a disgrace.

8

MeVersusShark t1_j1dblnq wrote

There are slam dunk cases, but they plead out. 17 is the going rate for a non-aggravated murder as I understand it.

1

Luke90210 t1_j0vpfd3 wrote

It sounds bad, but he is going to do his time with other violent criminals, not with the guys doing simple credit card fraud.

3