Submitted by seejordan3 t3_zyttm6 in nyc
brighttobrighter t1_j29naub wrote
Reply to comment by dark10043 in 'Drag Story Hour' protest draws passionate crowds outside Queens library by seejordan3
That's because drag queens are performers. Clowns don't wear the big shoes and rubber noses to bed, either. ;P
As to why pick drag queens in particular to share that message? Probably for the same reason we had Bill Nye the science guy teach kids about science back in the 90's. Kids like fun! And so do their parents. :)
sassbayc t1_j29opnp wrote
the wikipedia page for the organization literally says their mission is indoctrination lmao
brighttobrighter t1_j29oz7v wrote
Oh my, that is troubling. Can you share a link to the source so we can see the quote?
sassbayc t1_j29p4ji wrote
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_Queen_Story_Hour
The program strives to "instill the imagination and play of gender fluidity of childhood and gives kids glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role models"
brighttobrighter t1_j29pzvh wrote
That's a quote from a ThinkProgess article about Straight Pride? It says so in the Wiki source list. Also the quote seems to be from a Facebook page called Resist Marxism talking about the story hour, not a quote from the organization itself.
The actual organization says:
"In our original 45-minute Drag Story Hour (DSH) program designed for children ages 3-8, local drag performers trained by children’s librarians read picture books that touch on themes of diversity and difference, sing songs, and do craft activities. In learning about drag as a form of dress-up and play, children learn to see beyond the pink and blue gender binary and celebrate difference in themselves and others."
So yeah, seems pretty tame to me. Genuinely a little concerned about what you find objectionable here, but that's your business.
sassbayc t1_j29qc5m wrote
that's literally a different way to say the same thing.
key quote: "children learn to see beyond the pink and blue gender binary"
thats indoctrination.
brighttobrighter t1_j29qict wrote
I don't think you're going to find that your definition of indoctrination matches up with the majority of people's definition. Anyway, I think we've gotten as far as we'll get in this conversation and I'd like to go enjoy the nice weather. Take care!
sassbayc t1_j29r62d wrote
...you literally suggested that the drag queens reading were only a thing because it's light and fun when the non-profit's own website directly says their mission is to "teach" kids to question gender norms.
lilitalybabe t1_j2a0gz5 wrote
Exposing children to the fact that there are more than two genders and teaching them that those people exist and should be treated with respect is not indoctrination.
brighttobrighter t1_j29rfs2 wrote
You're being silly. I compared it to Bill Nye teaching kids about science in one of my first posts. But I really am out of time to debate this for the day, so I hope you find somebody else to butt heads with. :)
sassbayc t1_j29s295 wrote
Bill Nye only wants to teach kids about science. They don't have some ulterior motive of indoctrinating kids that's unrelated to whatever story they might be reading.
Spittinglama t1_j2a5fni wrote
Yeah and religious Sunday schools are also indoctrination by that definition. It's a matter of what you're indoctrinating kids into. Acceptance? Not feeling pressured into gender binary because that's what society pushes at large? Wonderful! Indoctrinating kids into existential guilt because they might have less conventional attractions? Awful.
Menacing_Quokka t1_j2aeuaa wrote
But if I call it indoctrination it sounds scary and nefarious. And not just...raising a kid.
hecramsey t1_j2el1xi wrote
no it isnt ,and you are wrong about the facts presented. when I was taught to drive I wasn't indoctrinated I was educated.
[deleted] t1_j2fq28p wrote
[removed]
nickelloafer t1_j2av4jq wrote
lol not sure why you're getting downvoted - that quote is directly from the drag story hour official website: https://www.dragstoryhour.org/about
dark10043 t1_j29nyfr wrote
Fair point. I just don’t think this event is is appropriate for kids prior to highschool at least.
ukudancer t1_j29r9kg wrote
That's for their parents to decide.
dark10043 t1_j29s195 wrote
They are protesting it as we speak?
Zombie_farts t1_j2abssn wrote
Why protest when they could just ... not send their kids to it? These are opt in events
panda12291 t1_j2ahjrv wrote
Not the ones who brought their kids to it... There are a bunch of angry adults protesting who could have just chosen to not bring their children to these events and let others live their lives. They're the ones forcing these conversations on everyone else.
ukudancer t1_j2aa4v5 wrote
I know and it's absolutely dumb.
im_not_bovvered t1_j2a7few wrote
Why? It’s not any different than a clown.
TakingADumpRightNow t1_j29pmtj wrote
At some point, you need to ask yourself if your views on the subject are at odds with the genera consensus, and if so, why.
Pylos425BC t1_j2a185b wrote
Do you really think there’s a settled, “general consensus” on this?
TakingADumpRightNow t1_j2a67tr wrote
Actually, yes. These demonstrators are a vocal minority.
Informal_Bus_4077 t1_j2avow4 wrote
So the majority is always right?
TakingADumpRightNow t1_j2axnd7 wrote
Thats some 2nd grade reading comprehension right there.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments