Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

WickhamAkimbo t1_j13zidm wrote

Reply to comment by BiblioPhil in New York City Unveils Gate of the Exonerated in Central Park Honoring Wrongly Convicted People by lifandigoosogn

Or maybe they're both bad and you shouldn't treat politics as a team sport? Maybe grow up a little?

11

BiblioPhil t1_j140255 wrote

Maybe acknowledge that being wrongly accused of rape is unjust regardless of whether you've stolen from someone. Team sports have nothing to do with it (unless you're suggesting that only one "team" says that).

−11

WickhamAkimbo t1_j141p56 wrote

It is absolutely unjust and should be recognized as such. This thread was, from the beginning, talking about recognizing that while not memorializing people that nonetheless also committed other crimes.

8

BiblioPhil t1_j1425zr wrote

I actually don't think whether or not they committed "other crimes" was the point of the post. The point was that they were wrongly accused due to racism.

As another commenter pointed out, it's never been a requirement that someone be perfect for a statue to be made of them. Why start imposing that requirement now?

−2

WickhamAkimbo t1_j143yon wrote

That's a good counter-argument. I think for a lot of people the spree mugging is a big enough issue that they are going to have an issue memorializing them.

0

newestindustry t1_j1479ie wrote

Spree mugging or not, those people would have an issue with this particular memorial no matter what, for reasons that are extremely obvious to everyone.

3

BiblioPhil t1_j14fq1n wrote

I wonder what the overlap is between people who oppose this statue on those grounds and people who defend Columbus monuments or Trump votes. I'm guessing...very large.

3

drpvn t1_j14g2je wrote

This is the flowchart I use to determine my position on every issue.

3

BiblioPhil t1_j14n731 wrote

The point is that supporting both is contradictory, yet many people do it. Because their issue with commemorating the exonerated people isn't that they were flawed individuals. It's something else.

3

drpvn t1_j14p7zu wrote

I’m not a mind reader. My issue with honoring these five guys in particular—and there’s a gigantic difference between, on the one hand, apologizing to them on behalf of the city and state, paying them compensation, and condemning the miscarriage of justice that happened, and, on the other hand, honoring them—is that all the information I have strongly suggests that these guys were absolute pieces of shit, at least as teenagers.

What Trump voters think about this just doesn’t enter into my mind at all. Not every issue needs to be a fight among two warring factions for control over an overarching narrative. But that’s just me.

If Mark Wahlberg were unjustly convicted of rape and then exonerated, I would still think he was a piece of shit.

Taking a step back, though, this debate shouldn’t really be about these guys in particular. The gate doesn’t honor them specifically. It’s about people who have been exonerated. But it’s hard to separate them from the larger issue given that they always show up as the poster boys.

5