Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

devolka t1_j69q0a3 wrote

I don't know what that means. I said no overtime. That's what I meant.

−1

koreamax t1_j69v4hs wrote

There's no winning with people like you. Getting rid of overtime means hiring more cops, which I'm sure you wouldn't like either.

5

devolka t1_j69wy66 wrote

Or it means giving cops less to do.

I like have every answer for you involves more cops. Aren't you paying attention? More cops doesn't reduce crime.

−3

koreamax t1_j69xbo0 wrote

Dude, not everyone who disagrees with you is a bootlicker. Learn how to respond to people. Immediately assuming what I want makes for a bad argument. More cops seemed to reduce crime on subways

8

devolka t1_j6a6b27 wrote

I didn't didn't bring up bootleggers. You did. I was laughing at how you can't come up with a sutuin that doesn't involve more cops.

Lol. It's weird. You can only come up with one solution and ita the one we know doesn't work. Lol

−1

chug84 t1_j6d8gux wrote

> I didn't didn't bring up bootleggers

He brought up bootlickers, not bootleggers.

1

devolka t1_j6d9xyx wrote

When did I every mention bootlickers? It's not a term I tend to use.

2

chug84 t1_j6e9ifz wrote

I was pointing out a typo on your part.

3

devolka t1_j6eaz8x wrote

Ha. Yeah. It's the tragic combination of not being good at spelling, having fat fingers, and being too lazy to proof read a 40 word message.... lol.

1