Comments
HEIMDVLLR t1_j4rrz9e wrote
> “Less than .1% of NYC residents who commute by car to lower Manhattan live more than 10 minute walk from a subway, commuter rail or express bus stop.” - u/jm14ed
Pool_Shark t1_j4s3ni6 wrote
Why is this quote hurting my head to wrap around the meaning
09-24-11 t1_j4v2v9b wrote
I tried to read it so many times.
The amount of people who commute to lower manhattan by car, who also live more than a 10 minute walk to public transit, is less than 0.01%.
Mariowario64 t1_j4wk5zc wrote
It basically means build it and they will come i.e. when people have reliable public transportation access, they use it.
Pool_Shark t1_j4wlgku wrote
Should be common sense
TeamMisha t1_j4tdepc wrote
They had an argument in another thread that's now here too. I'm not sure what the article here has to do with the other, besides it being well documented that Queens lacks subway transit in many areas, which better TOD would fix either by expanding transit or giving people more opportunities to move closer to transit.
jmlinden7 t1_j4w6k7j wrote
(Lower manhattan car commuters who live >10 minutes from a train/express bus stop)/(total lower manhattan car commuters) = some number less than 0.1%
HEIMDVLLR t1_j4s8g6m wrote
The above quoted bullshit is what was told to me by that user. Who clearly doesn’t live in NYC. Claimed that percentage came directly from an MTA’s report. Trying to downplay my real life experience as someone living in the eastern part of Queens.
The highlighted areas are.. > part of New York within one kilometer (0.62 miles) of a subway station (see the figure above). The typical person would need to walk about 10-15 minutes to catch a train
jm14ed t1_j4sgi3g wrote
Wow.. I thought you didn’t believe in facts..?
I’m not surprised you can’t figure out the difference here.
HEIMDVLLR t1_j4sh7k6 wrote
Please explain what the difference is, I’ve been dying for you to explain it.
jm14ed t1_j4shvto wrote
Why should I waste any more time on you?
You admitted that you don’t care about facts and you clearly have your head firmly between your two cheeks.
Not sure why you feel like stalking me.
Edit: I’m honored that you blocked me. Good luck continuing to live in ignorance.
[deleted] t1_j4si2v3 wrote
[removed]
TeamMisha t1_j4tecl3 wrote
On topic, an interesting question for eastern Queens is whether people there such as yourself want transit expansion (I assume in your case yes). Half the boro is basically a suburb, especially the northeast around Whitestone and Bayside, it's all detached housing pretty much. I used to have a lot of friends over there, and the feelings seemed like they want it to stay more suburb-like, similar to many other areas that have opposed transit expansion (similar to north Astoria blocking previous N expansion attempts, and Staten Island as a whole). TOD by design would expand density wherever transit expands to, which seems very anathema to many suburban dwellers. This feeds into the concept of should these areas even exist as they do now, is logical to have such low density housing within city limits? Some would argue building an expensive subway for detached houses is a waste of money unless you upzoned, so it's an interested proposition.
HEIMDVLLR t1_j4tqle2 wrote
The entire eastern part of Queens is full of detached housing. From College Point and Whitestone on the north side all the way down to Laurelton and Rosedale in the south side.
Extending the subway system further East is an option. The lines could follow the commercial streets, like Northern Blvd, Union Turnpike, Hillside avenue, Jamaica Ave, Merrick Blvd and Rockaway Blvd.
Jamaica Center, Supthin and the Van Wyck stations on the E train didn’t exist before the mid 80s.
Packed buses from Jamaica is a big indicator that people haven’t reached their final destination. Most still have another 30 to 45 minute bus ride. This is also true for anyone living in other parts of the city not within walking distance of a subway station.
Which is why dollar vans became a thing the further out you lived, but the city dropped the ball with that. So I can’t see why any one would oppose expanding it. Except racist NIMBY who “don’t want other city folks coming into their neighborhood”. I’ve heard this is the reason why there is no direct subway line between the Bronx and Queens.
The transit system likes to slow down or not run at all (Express Buses), during off-peak and weekends. That’s when the MTA really becomes a last resort option if you work late nights/weekends or decide to go anywhere.
Which is why having access to a car means freedom. You can work wherever and whenever you want. It also means a lot of time saved not waiting for the bus and train, or forced to go out of your way because there’s no direct connection.
There’s nothing like getting stuck far from home because of a service disruption. Like no Queens bound E or F train after 10pm. Or getting off the bus at Jamaica to find out there’s no Manhattan bound service.
There really should be a documentary about the 2005 transit strike, what Sandy did to the subway tunnels under the East River and how people got home during the 2003 black out.
NetQuarterLatte t1_j4slgfr wrote
>Wasted on 242nd Street. This is a typical example of how New York does not do transited-oriented development. Adjacent to the last stop on the 1 train is a string of one-story retail buildings. These lots should contain mixed-use mid-rise apartment buildings.
If I'm understanding Hochul's housing compact correctly, that will address this exact kind of problem by up-zoning lots that are close to mass transit.