Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

elizabeth-cooper t1_j4hhr99 wrote

>t's just as possible that the administration of those kitchens/pantries will be negatively affected by these cuts.

They're not. The article doesn't even hint at that possibility.

Again: it says they're trying to cut currently vacant positions.

3

aneightfoldway t1_j4hk4ut wrote

And, surprise surprise, this article doesn't cover every single thing that could possibly be affected. It's absolutely possible that cutting funding for the agency responsible for assisting the food insecure will leave more people food insecure.

2

elizabeth-cooper t1_j4hl6yi wrote

Its not cutting "funding to the agency." It's cutting vacant positions and the funding for those positions. What those positions do, nobody knows. We are going in circles. I keep repeating what the article says and you keep saying YEAH BUT YEAH BUT YEAH BUT

5

aneightfoldway t1_j4hlffq wrote

Great, let's stop going in circles. If you think that it's "not true" that people will go without food after cutting funding for positions with the HRA then I wholeheartedly disagree with you. Do with that what you will and have a nice day.

1