Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

AutoModerator t1_j3y53l3 wrote

Users often report submissions from this site and ask us to ban it for sensationalized articles. At /r/nyc, we oppose blanket banning any news source. Readers have a >responsibility to be skeptical, check sources and comment on any flaws. You can help improve this thread by linking to media that verifies or questions this article's claims. Your link could help readers better understand this issue. If you do find >evidence that this article or its title are false or misleading, contact the moderators who will review it.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

FarmSuch5021 t1_j3ydy9f wrote

Yeah, all those bigots who done it to Asians got away with such a light sentences. I want to see what they going to charge a white man for it.

45

Ok-Concentrate-9316 t1_j3yfhzq wrote

I wonder where he got inspired? The more you put it out there the more it will happen. The country still has no clue how to address racism in a proper way.

−17

ECK-2188 t1_j3yqjui wrote

/s Can’t think of anyone who cares about violence against Asians, except for Asians.

Cmon’ be real

25

SuperTeamRyan t1_j3yt7wd wrote

Replying to throws_rocks_at_cars (#1,336,627)

More like it doesn't fit the political wedge republicans are trying to create between black and Asian communities who primarily vote democrat so those chuds won't be here to promote it.

The delivery guy who was shot over duck sauce was big news until it was revealed to be a white guy then no one gave a fuck. Same thing with the grandma who was set on fire until it turned out to be some white kids from bensonhurst once again people stopped giving a fuck.

8

Rottimer t1_j3yuk58 wrote

Replying to FrenchToastForDinner (#1,335,720)

It also won't get 100+ comments and bunch of dog whistles plus some bull horns blaming one particular race for all violence against Asians.

edit: I was wrong. The racists still showed up to write a bunch of dog whistles about black people and took the number of comments above 100.

9

KidAstoria t1_j3yuy9y wrote

If you see this happen, interject and beat their ass. Stop being scared and just record it in your phone.

42

oreosfly t1_j3yvjzk wrote

Over/under on a dozen priors? I'll take the over.

121

I_AM_TARA t1_j3z72y4 wrote

Replying to koreamax (#1,336,820)

What point of view exactly? That users with little to no previous activity in this subreddit go to certain posts to drop slurs and such is something that shouldn’t be tolerated?

1

jewishseeker t1_j3z97nk wrote

I hope they throw the book at this piece of scum

25

koreamax t1_j3z9l18 wrote

Replying to I_AM_TARA (#1,337,483)

No, as I said above-it's just an excuse to validate your point of view.

People in this sub throw that word around immediately. Not everyone has the same point of view as you.

2

ehsurfskate t1_j3za3hk wrote

Replying to FarmSuch5021 (#1,336,799)

These are just two individual cases though right? I was wondering if you had some data showing a trend where cases against those who commit assault against Asians are adjudicated differently.

11

KaiDaiz t1_j3zbcx1 wrote

Check the nearby shelters, high chance found there

7

abcmozart t1_j3zbmmm wrote

Replying to MandatoryDissent55 (#1,336,677)

I can’t tell what he is but I also know that Hispanic isn’t a racial identifier but, rather, an ethnicity. You should also know that Hispanics can be of any race. You’re in NYC and should already know this.

16

citydudeatnight t1_j3zcj9q wrote

Nice to know the people here so focused on the race of the perpetrator almost or actually do forget about the poor victim because the notion of the white man needing to be "vindicated" is way more important and the victim's plight is just incidental

For those who have their "priorities" right - Thanks for demonstrating what kind of human beings you are. So much for All Lives Matter

40

Bjj-lyfe t1_j3zf34r wrote

Replying to Imaginary-Bread1829 (#1,337,078)

Exactly, people are very self serving: racist white people comment when a black guys the perp, and black ppl use this as a platform to bemoan their racial issues when a white guys the perp, but no one actually discusses or cares about the Asian victims or the culture/entertainment industry that portrays Asians in a particular, biased way which lends itself to these incidents

20

HeyaGFY1 t1_j3zf699 wrote

Replying to HEIMDVLLR (#1,337,053)

The projection is real.

Esp when there is no mention of racism anywhere in my comment. Quite damning, actually, that this is your knee-jerk reply. 🤔

Edit: as is your post history re: Asians. Yikes

11

iNeedPhotos t1_j3zh51n wrote

The lettering appears to read Romantic Depot

1

FarmSuch5021 t1_j3zlwbr wrote

Replying to despreocupado (#1,338,095)

I love how Redditors say that stuff. But everyone on the train or on street just stand by and do nothing. Who you going to fight? A crack head or homeless person who is not going even to go to jail or get released within 1 hour?

32

citydudeatnight t1_j3zmrde wrote

Replying to Bjj-lyfe (#1,337,918)

When the Atlanta shootings occurred, many of the All Lives Matter folks attacked the asian victims for being possible prostitutes and hosting brothels while at the same time the sheriff dismissed the situation as the shooter having a bad day. The statements were there to vindicate themselves in some fashion and it was sad to see. I'm not anti-white. I'm absolutely disgustedand horrified by people and cowards who hide behind keyboards to discredit or ignore victims to elevate their own racial tribe as if the entire race asked them to do it.

8

despreocupado t1_j3zn4m2 wrote

Replying to FarmSuch5021 (#1,338,244)

Oh so you're a coward and an ignorant idiot. A "crackhead" and a "homeless person" are entireley different from a racist terrorist. The former two are avoided at all costs until they start something with a weaker innocent person while the latter is eating the pavement within minutes. Just because they don't show working people defending themselves on your beloved evening news propaganda machine doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

−31

JetmoYo t1_j3znk2g wrote

Let's not bicker about race and simply take solace in knowing that ALL races can hate on us Asians. Peace on earth.

18

user_joined_just_now t1_j3ztcpz wrote

Replying to ThreeLittlePuigs (#1,337,642)

Notice how none of the progressives here are talking about how we need to increase access to mental health services and address the root causes of such crimes instead of locking him up. You know he did this because Eric Adams didn't hire enough lifeguards, right?

−18

user_joined_just_now t1_j400eg9 wrote

Replying to ThreeLittlePuigs (#1,338,876)

Progressives don't advocate for addressing "the root causes of crime" through social services, more lifeguards, or whatever the solution to the latest "root cause" is, while opposing carceral solutions to crime? Yeah, that literally never happens ever. My mistake.

−11

ThreeLittlePuigs t1_j401joa wrote

Replying to [deleted] (#1,338,959)

They did in the modmail on the last account….I never said they did that in the above comment

ETA: lol you were also an alt. Well done giving yourself an award and then catching a ban from the admins

5

ThreeLittlePuigs t1_j405ekx wrote

Replying to iatepudding (#1,339,083)

Yes I'm sure the person ban evading who sent me PM's just now calling me names and who made 3 comments on this account, 2 of which were basically accusing the Mods of doing things "because they're black" is totally being honest.

16

kenwanepento t1_j40ai1b wrote

What's this fella doing with his pants? Looks like he's holding up a dirty pair of pants over another pair. Also in the second picture he's stepping right into a puddle with sneakers on.

2

KeySea7727 t1_j40kzsd wrote

the perp is not brown enough, will many people care?

2

[deleted] OP t1_j40md8q wrote

Wtf is wrong with people. Idc what you believe I mean racism is disgusting, but nobody can police your thoughts. What’s with all this senseless violence tho? If you hate minorities so much gtfo of NYC.

13

ehsurfskate t1_j40qyai wrote

Replying to PandaJ108 (#1,338,187)

This still doesn’t show what the first commenter was saying. I read the article and the jist of it seems to be that hate crime charges often get dropped since they are hard to prove and therefore it’s better to charge them with something that will actually stick. There seems to be a higher burden to prove it’s actually a hate crime and not just an assault beyond the attacker just being another skin color.

Anyways, the data I was asking for is data that shows “people who commit hate crimes against Asians get the charges dropped at a higher rate than hate crimes against other races”. This is what the commenter was claiming and nothing so far has supported this.

8

Darrkman t1_j40u7qm wrote

So after 14 hours this Asian hate post only has 191 up votes and 93 comments.

Hmmmm that's very different from how these posts usually go on here. I wonder what could be different? I can't QWHITE put my finger on it. The difference is QWHITE interesting.

−9

567Antonio t1_j412vu9 wrote

Replying to Rottimer (#1,336,829)

Because one race IS significantly more to commit racist crimes against asians, whether you like it or not.

Here's the data - https://www.city-journal.org/anti-asian-violence-separating-truth-from-narrative

Let's see how you try to spin and hide facts, since you people don't think of Asians as worthy of being defended.

> The data indicate just how misleading the narrative of white-on-Asian violence really is. While black perpetrators account for 27.5 percent of violent attacks against Asians, Asians commit less than 0.1 percent of violent attacks against blacks, indicating little role for proximity. Most violent attacks against individuals of a particular racial group are committed by other members of that group—except for Asians, where a plurality is committed by blacks. In fact, blacks are responsible for 305 percent more violent crime against Asians than neighborhood demographics would predict, while whites and Hispanics commit significantly fewer attacks against Asians than would be expected.

16

Rottimer t1_j415e9x wrote

Replying to 567Antonio (#1,340,597)

It doesn’t matter if that’s true. The comments imply that the race is the problem when it’s very obvious that the vast majority of that race has never committed a crime. Painting an entire race as criminal is in fact racist.

−3

567Antonio t1_j415qma wrote

Replying to Rottimer (#1,340,744)

Pointing out that violent racist crime is disappropriately done by one race relative to their population is facts, not racism.

Which means relative to other races in New York, they have more racists, and therefore are more racist per capita, which is another fact and simple statistics. Just like we can say Trumpers are racist too.

Feel free to point out anything wrong.

8

567Antonio t1_j419x2k wrote

Replying to Rottimer (#1,340,880)

Since you're reduced to childish tantrums and name calling, and ranting in a corner all by yourself, I guess we're done here.

People like you who try to silence others fighting back against hate are the same as racists. Usually racists themselves.

0

Nathaniel82A t1_j41d1pb wrote

Replying to TheSpaceBetweenUs__ (#1,339,789)

These are very much crimes of opportunity. Easy target, from behind, likely alone, easy escape. This bitch would catch a right hand from hell itself if if he pushes the wrong person, quickly followed up with a few face stomps for good measure.

10

wanderingjew2 t1_j41pp7m wrote

Bro is wearing a romantic depot sweatshirt 😂😂😂

7

happybarfday t1_j42axry wrote

Replying to kenwanepento (#1,339,366)

That describes like every other homeless mentally fucked up person you see in the city. They always have the oversized-pants-falling-down-over-another-pair-of-torn-pants-over-soiled-basketball-shorts thing going on.

3

z0rb0r t1_j42jdxt wrote

NYPost trying to piss off asian new yorkers into going red. Not denying that asian hate doesn't happen.

1

Imaginary-Bread1829 t1_j42mmrm wrote

Replying to citydudeatnight (#1,338,290)

People honestly take race crimes almost as if it’s a personal attack if the perp is the same race as them. It’s like they’re afraid of being generalized so in return they generalize. The comment above articulated it perfectly & you provided a great example; why is it so hard to detach from news stories, not make it about themselves, to focus on the victim? It’s like these stories only create more racism, instead of awareness

1

567Antonio t1_j430zdc wrote

Replying to Yonder_Zach (#1,343,827)

Here's the data - https://www.city-journal.org/anti-asian-violence-separating-truth-from-narrative

Let's see how you try to spin and hide facts, since you people don't think of Asians as worthy of being defended.

> The data indicate just how misleading the narrative of white-on-Asian violence really is. While black perpetrators account for 27.5 percent of violent attacks against Asians, Asians commit less than 0.1 percent of violent attacks against blacks, indicating little role for proximity. Most violent attacks against individuals of a particular racial group are committed by other members of that group—except for Asians, where a plurality is committed by blacks. In fact, blacks are responsible for 305 percent more violent crime against Asians than neighborhood demographics would predict, while whites and Hispanics commit significantly fewer attacks against Asians than would be expected.

4

567Antonio t1_j431c2u wrote

Replying to Darrkman (#1,340,187)

Here's probably why - https://www.city-journal.org/anti-asian-violence-separating-truth-from-narrative

> The data indicate just how misleading the narrative of white-on-Asian violence really is. While black perpetrators account for 27.5 percent of violent attacks against Asians, Asians commit less than 0.1 percent of violent attacks against blacks, indicating little role for proximity. Most violent attacks against individuals of a particular racial group are committed by other members of that group—except for Asians, where a plurality is committed by blacks. In fact, blacks are responsible for 305 percent more violent crime against Asians than neighborhood demographics would predict, while whites and Hispanics commit significantly fewer attacks against Asians than would be expected.

5

567Antonio t1_j431ml2 wrote

Replying to Rottimer (#1,340,880)

And of course, here's the data again that you conveniently ignore - https://www.city-journal.org/anti-asian-violence-separating-truth-from-narrative

Let's see how you try to spin and hide facts, since you people don't think of Asians as worthy of being defended.

> The data indicate just how misleading the narrative of white-on-Asian violence really is. While black perpetrators account for 27.5 percent of violent attacks against Asians, Asians commit less than 0.1 percent of violent attacks against blacks, indicating little role for proximity. Most violent attacks against individuals of a particular racial group are committed by other members of that group—except for Asians, where a plurality is committed by blacks. In fact, blacks are responsible for 305 percent more violent crime against Asians than neighborhood demographics would predict, while whites and Hispanics commit significantly fewer attacks against Asians than would be expected.

4

567Antonio t1_j432rh1 wrote

Replying to [deleted] (#1,343,934)

> Except that you’re wrong and the vast majority of anti Asian acts nationwide is committed by white Americans.

On per capita basis, blacks are more than 300% likely to commit hate crimes against Asians, despite you trying to hide that fact.

And of course, here's the data again that you conveniently ignore - https://www.city-journal.org/anti-asian-violence-separating-truth-from-narrative

Let's see how you try to spin and hide facts, since you people don't think of Asians as worthy of being defended.

> The data indicate just how misleading the narrative of white-on-Asian violence really is. While black perpetrators account for 27.5 percent of violent attacks against Asians, Asians commit less than 0.1 percent of violent attacks against blacks, indicating little role for proximity. Most violent attacks against individuals of a particular racial group are committed by other members of that group—except for Asians, where a plurality is committed by blacks. In fact, blacks are responsible for 305 percent more violent crime against Asians than neighborhood demographics would predict, while whites and Hispanics commit significantly fewer attacks against Asians than would be expected.

8

Saladcitypig t1_j436s47 wrote

Replying to 567Antonio (#1,340,772)

I wonder what other things might be linking a ton of these attackers… it might be poverty and untreated mental illness. But you know, keep pretending you’re telling facts, like Fox News.

2

567Antonio t1_j4370yk wrote

Replying to Saladcitypig (#1,344,561)

Because one race IS significantly more likely to commit racist crimes against asians, whether you like it or not.

Here's the data - https://www.city-journal.org/anti-asian-violence-separating-truth-from-narrative

> The data indicate just how misleading the narrative of white-on-Asian violence really is. While black perpetrators account for 27.5 percent of violent attacks against Asians, Asians commit less than 0.1 percent of violent attacks against blacks, indicating little role for proximity. Most violent attacks against individuals of a particular racial group are committed by other members of that group—except for Asians, where a plurality is committed by blacks. In fact, blacks are responsible for 305 percent more violent crime against Asians than neighborhood demographics would predict, while whites and Hispanics commit significantly fewer attacks against Asians than would be expected.

0

Yonder_Zach t1_j438pou wrote

Replying to 567Antonio (#1,344,251)

Literally no one is saying asians arent worthy of being defended. So often these sorts of stories are totally blown out of proportion and capitalized upon by conservatives and/or racists trying to rile people up. The link you posted is interesting if true- unfortunately articles published by right wing think tanks are rarely accurate.

3

Darrkman t1_j43isi1 wrote

Replying to 567Antonio (#1,344,271)

Ahhhh City Journal. Why do you dudes on here always try to come at me with City Journal like I don't know it's published by the Manhattan Institute.

You remember the conservative Manhattan Institute. Where one of their senior members said this....

Mac Donald has controversially argued that the consequences of this trend adversely affect African-American communities, stating that "there is no government agency **more dedicated to the idea that black lives matter than the police".[**47][48]

Give me a fucking break.

1

Darrkman t1_j43owxt wrote

Replying to 567Antonio (#1,345,229)

It's not a matter of throwing a tantrum and the fact that you're trying to say I am after you've posted the same thing six times in this thread tells me less that you want to have a discussion and more that you want to just try to talk shit. No matter what you try to say the source matters and you're asking me to take the Manhattan Institute seriously when they're the same group of people who will tell you that the Ferguson effect is real and that the group that cares the most that black lives matter are cops.

With that being said I've already seen you change your answer when people called out the numbers. When you look at a national set of numbers the majority of people who have harassed Asians have been white people but then you stop saying it's about the numbers and then you start talking about it's their percentages. You're acting like I haven't seen that kind of disingenuous BS before in here and that's the part I find hilarious.

1

567Antonio t1_j43pexo wrote

Replying to Darrkman (#1,345,448)

> after you've posted the same thing six times in this thread

Because racists in this thread are trying to hide the numbers and blame whites. If people like you would stop hiding the truth, I can stop posting.

> when people called out the numbers.

Where did people point out the numbers?

> the majority of people who have harassed Asians have been white people

Because whites are 75% of the population. But on a per capita basis, blacks are 300% more likely to commit violent crimes against asians.

The raw data set dating from 2018 is right there.

Feel free to refute instead of throwing unproductive, subjective tantrums.

2

Gb_packers973 t1_j43x819 wrote

Replying to [deleted] (#1,343,934)

To be fair - the combine verbal and physical assaults into one, and they rely on the reporting frequency of the perpetrators race.

When the article doesnt mention race, it doesnt get included in the data set.

Quite frankly no one would bat an eye if every asian attack in the city was kept verbal.

The multiple curb stomping of asian seniors and women is not really found amongst other demographics in the city.

3

Yonder_Zach t1_j43znnb wrote

Replying to 567Antonio (#1,345,225)

Yeah sure but theres basically no far left in this country at all, let alone far left think tanks influencing policy and manipulating huge swaths of the country. There are however well funded and well coordinated far right organizations doing all of those things at an unprecedented scale.

0

Darrkman t1_j462eix wrote

Replying to spicytoastaficionado (#1,346,187)

> The stats they present are accurate.

Nah they're not. Cause what the article is trying to do is shift the narrative to Black people by looking at likely instead of WHO IS ACTUALLY attacking Asian......that's white people.

Not once does that article present ACTUAL NUMBERS and that is deliberate. Percentages without the hard numbers behind them are ALWAYS misleading. I've seen people post articles in here claiming a certain crime jumped 70% but that translated to all of 3 more incidents.

1

Darrkman t1_j462smk wrote

Replying to 567Antonio (#1,340,597)

Here is something to keep in mind when dudes like this post these articles.

Always question why an article will post a percentage but won't show you the ACTUAL numbers. It's easy to use percentages only to push a narrative.....its a lot harder when you have the numbers that go with it.

Finally also remember that City Journal is published by the Manhattan Institute a very conservative think tank that once said that the group that cares the most about Black lives mattering were the POLICE.

It's amazingly convenient that an article will say Black people make up 25% of incidents with Asians but SOMEHOW doesn't tell you the make up of that remaining 75%. I WONDER WHY????

1

567Antonio t1_j47ff92 wrote

Replying to Darrkman (#1,349,523)

Raw data set they used is right here from the government - https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/criminal-victimization-2018 with over 180,000 violent attacks on Asians on record.

It doesn't matter who published it, the fact of the matter is the data shows blacks are 300% more likely to commit violent crimes against Asians.

> It's amazingly convenient that an article will say Black people make up 25% of incidents

It's 27.5% actually. And since we're talking about hate crimes, it excludes asian on asian violence.

Why are you trying to hide hate crimes. You're exactly the same as white trumpers who claim racism doesn't exist.

Dr Martin Luther King Jr said ""Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter."

Just because the data discomforts you doesn't mean you should hide it. He'd be ashamed of you right now.

4

_switch360_ t1_j4l5zj0 wrote

Love that the NY Post becomes a source of news when convenient.

1