BakedBread65 t1_j5w1aew wrote
> by returning to a “union shop” system—meaning union contribution responsibilities are shared across all employees hired into union-eligible positions regardless of membership status
So forcing non-Union members to pay towards the union? Fuck that.
phoenixmatrix t1_j5wluv7 wrote
I'm curious how many positions are union-eligible. HC is fairly large, and the amount of employees in that union are a very small percentage, but I'm not sure how many people they potentially cover.
PM-Nice-Thoughts t1_j5y7mfv wrote
Yeah, a system like that shouldn't even be legal. Hopefully the publisher can hold out
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments