Submitted by corumgold t3_11e7u9z in personalfinance

Background: My wife and I are DINKs and we are grateful to earn enough to max out our 401Ks. When we married, we each had a home, one of which we decided to keep and rent out instead of sell (and it's doing reasonably well!) The remaining mortgage on the rental is around $95k on a 15-year fixed loan with 2.625% interest. We have around $60k in liquid savings outside of retirement accounts.

My question is this, while mathematically it makes sense to invest the rest of our disposable income in IRAs and then a taxable account, I feel like having two mortgages puts us at increased risk in case one of us were to lose a job.

For context, my original plan, which was a bit Ramsey-an was to pay off both mortgages (our primary residence mortgage is a 30-year fixed at 2.25%), but I feel like that just doesn't make any sense.

I am curious about others' thoughts on either spending the next several months saving in a high-interest savings account then paying off the rental mortgage, thus freeing up around $800 a month in income, or simply investing all extra income into IRAs and taxable accounts.

I appreciate any insights or opinions here!

EDIT: Because people are requesting more personal info.

-We are not in particularly high-risk jobs (I'm a SWE and my wife is in architecture/engineering)

-Rental total cost per month is $1050 and rent is $1250

-Remaining mortgage on rental is $94k and primary residence is $245k

8

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

84740296169 t1_jacpi29 wrote

At that interest rate it make zero sense to pay off the mortgage

26

TeslaSaganTysonNye t1_jacptjx wrote

>I feel like having two mortgages puts us at increased risk in case one of us were to lose a job.

That's a fair assessment, but if your numbers are good this risk becomes less and less something you need to concern yourself with.

>For context, my original plan, which was a bit Ramsey-an was to pay off both mortgages (our primary residence mortgage is a 30-year fixed at 2.25%), but I feel like that just doesn't make any sense.

You are correct. Mathematically speaking it doesn't make sense to pay down cheap debt. However, it's dependent on your risk appetite.

>I am curious about others' thoughts on either spending the next several months saving in a high-interest savings account then paying off the rental mortgage, thus freeing up around $800 a month in income, or simply investing all extra income into IRAs and taxable accounts.

I do my best to take emotion out of some decisions and let number do the talking. A little of both won't hurt either.

5

Flanky_Bwai t1_jacq8wh wrote

In short. One house is paying itself off and both have abysmal interest rates. I think it would be wise to invest your savings. Even a 3% yearly return (very low) would be more beneficial than paying off your mortgage.

Might as well buy another rental ;)

8

CAicefishing t1_jacuaoc wrote

Same situation here. Invest don’t pay off the mortgage. If your worried about losing your job, stick the money in a HYSA or treasuries. Don’t forget that $3-5k in interest you’re paying is lowering the taxable income on the property too.

7

Imaginary_Shelter_37 t1_jacuf4a wrote

If you feel as if two mortgages puts you at increased risk in case of job loss, then maybe you need a larger emergency fund. Increase your emergency fund to a level that makes you comfortable, then invest extra income.

3

Knipfty t1_jad193e wrote

Coming from the POV of having no mortgage, I'd say work on paying them off. Start with your primary residence. Then move on to the rental.

You are investing via your retirement accounts. As long as that is at 15% or more, you are fine.

Having no mortgage payment is a wonderful feeling. One that goes beyond dollars and cents.

Once those mortgages are paid off, then you crank up your investing and live like no one else.

1

redditenjoyer737 t1_jad2d42 wrote

As in what is going to matter more to you - an extra $1,800 or waking up knowing that each morning, that dirt under your feet is yours and yours alone and that you're no longer making payments on anything (except to Uncle Sam)

4

Jboycjf05 t1_jad4ffz wrote

That 1800 difference should be smaller. They would have an extra $800 of income each month that could be invested instead. So if you take that into account you're looking at like $300 a year in investment income, bringing the difference down to like $1500.

2

LuckFinancial988 t1_jad6dcy wrote

Invest it. If you lose a job and need to pay it off, it’ll still be there; but it’ll have a larger balance. There’s not much downside to this situation.

3

LuckFinancial988 t1_jad6k93 wrote

Not all debt is bad. That money they’re investing isn’t going anywhere where it can’t be used to pay off the mortgage in an emergency situation. Sounds like you subscribe to the Dave Ramsey mentality.

4

corumgold OP t1_jade8y7 wrote

Thank you! I suppose the only nightmare situation would be if we were to lose our jobs AND the market tanked… But, you can't make decisions out of fear. I think a good compromise might be upping our emergency fund a bit just to be safe.

1

84740296169 t1_jadxqfa wrote

That's just annual savings, in terms of present value (assuming he goest through the whole loan this way) it's about $10,000 in savings. PV of $800 payments a month for 11 ish years at 4.61% compared to $95000 on the loan.

3

yamaha2000us t1_jae9sjr wrote

Are you in that High of a Risk if one person loses their job?

The Rental should be paying for itself.

You really need to provide more information for anyone to give you insight on what is happening.

1

ct-yankee t1_jaeavuc wrote

Mathematically, at those interest rates, it doesn't make sense to pay off the house. While Dave Ramsey will tell you otherwise, you are better off financially by investing the cash (even in a HYSA at today's rates) and not pay off the mortgage. Ramsey has great advice about avoiding high cost interest debt, but that is where the quality of his advice ends. (Investment and otherwise.)

If your worst case scenario happens and you lose a job/earning is impaired, you'll still have the cash invested to pay it off should that be a choice you make.

Some are really driven by not having a mortgage and the feeling of owning your home. There is nothing wrong with that either, but it is not the best financial decision given the data points you've shared.

2