Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

[deleted] t1_jec7jaj wrote

I believe you would be breaking the law. State of primary residence is not just where your address is. By that logic someone can buy a trailer house in CA and live in remote MO and earn California money. It also involves your health insurance, car insurance and rest of the things. I’m not a lawyer or anything confirm with someone who is more knowledgeable about this

50

Rave-Unicorn-Votive t1_jec7old wrote

You might have a hard time convincing the state that everyone thinks you're living in, and you say you're living in, that you're not actually living there and therefore are due a refund of your taxes.

19

PTVA t1_jecac3h wrote

A little light fraud never hurt anyone...

Don't do this.

39

Worrosp t1_jecfi6r wrote

If your company uses a VPN, they can probably see where you're remotingfrom

9

firefly20200 t1_jecixm2 wrote

Also nice to see you're willing to screw everyone over in your low cost of living area by coming in with your huge remote pay and buying whatever the hell house you want for whatever cost it is.

I'm glad companies are finally starting to adjust pay based on location. Maybe we'll stop seeing everyone run away from Seattle and the $700k homes to take their $200k salary to a place three hours away with $300k homes and then offer $100k over asking because the house is cute.

You want a fancy high paying job, go live in your fancy expensive city.

−10

Lollc t1_jecl4rw wrote

...no income tax in Seattle. Yet.

0

exiestjw t1_jeclkua wrote

I would never work at a place that offers salary based cost of living in the location I live.

−13

tossme68 t1_jectw3d wrote

I believe the word is fraud. If you live in chicago you need to actually live in Chicago 183 days a year and pay the state's 5% income tax.

5

throwsisteraita t1_jecuvtp wrote

Just noting I’ve lived in both Seattle and Chicago, they’re very different on the scale of cost of living

3

n37x t1_jecw8eh wrote

IANAL but will give you my perspective.

I work as a travel healthcare worker, spending most of my year working away from my home address. There are very specific guidelines I need to follow to avoid running afoul of the IRS.

Going this route will likely make wherever you list for income purposes as your "domicile state." (if it's outside of the state you already reside in) I.e. where you earn most of your money and spend most of your time.

At a minimum this will subject you to the new locations income taxes and residency laws (edit:) while forfeiting any benefits from the state you actually live in. If there is any doubt about this a court will decide for you.

If a new state is declared your domicile, legally you need to transfer everything over. Driver ID, insurance, etc, and those premiums will likely bump to match the new location's COL. And it would really suck to trap your residency in a state that you don't actually own anything in, OR I'd imagine this would pose a barrier at tax time when trying to declare residency there. (Edit:) depending on if you own your house, you may pay extra taxes on it, or penalities if it is no longer considered your primary residence.

IRS will not be happy if there is any tax related fraud going on, but as long as you file appropriately, you should be fine.

IMO, if you wanted to do this while minimizing your legal risk, find the highest COL area in the same state. I certainly can't guarantee this is totally kosher by tax law, but there's nothing glaringly obvious that says this is a bad idea as far as the IRS is concerned.

Although even within the same state, I'd be more concerned with the employer finding out as I'm sure that deception could be classified as theft. You're getting terminated immediately, unable to claim unemployment, while being sued for the overpay.

Seems like an overall risky prospect. If you choose to proceed with this route, 100% seek legal council.

8

CookieAdventure t1_jecye0c wrote

You don’t even have to rent an Airbnb. You can get a mailbox through a private company that looks like a physical apartment address.

−2

Logizyme t1_jed26re wrote

Replying to Strong__Style (#2,513,172)

Why would the IRS care? You pay federal taxes anyway.

The states may care because they want you paying their taxes, whether they be income or sales.

The employer is the one who would really be mad to find out. They are paying a standard wage based on cost of living. They don't want to pay hcol wages to lcol remote workers, OP is considering gaming that offer.

−6

Beautiful_Age_7626 t1_jed6udp wrote

If you work remotely, wherever your ass is sitting is where your company is working from. So if you say you live in California, but really live in OH, then your company will be withholding taxes in California, not Ohio. This is a BIG problem for the company because they can be fined for not withholding Ohio taxes and not contributing to OH unemployment. They can also be fined if they have not registered with the State of Ohio.

1

Shrek1onDVD t1_jeddi58 wrote

I don’t recommend lying to your workplace about your true worksite location. I work in payroll and someone did this. Said they “lived” in Texas but actually lived elsewhere. The amount of trouble and taxes they had to pay back was not fun.

3

HopeFox t1_jedw4rr wrote

Regardless of whether you're breaking any laws in your interactions with the government and taxes, if you lie to your employer (or anybody) to induce them to give you more money, that's fraud and they can sue you for it at the very least.

1

IndexBot t1_jeedmg2 wrote

Please note that in order to keep this subreddit a high-quality place to discuss personal finance, posts advising breaking the law (whether serious or not) or asking for advice on how to break the law will be removed.

Find our Subreddit Rules for guidelines on our quality standards. We look forward to higher quality posts from your account in the future! Thanks.

If you have questions about this removal, please message the moderators.

1