Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

sonnyfab t1_iueoovz wrote

If the just invest 5k per year for 14 years into VTI, they're going to leave you and your siblings a lot more than 200k if they live into their late 70s or later.

That's the whole point.

The only way you and your siblings end up ahead with this life insurance scheme is if they die very soon, in which case term insurance would pay a lot more anyway.

Term life + index fund investment is a better way to leave a legacy than IUL.

1

Reasonable-Program29 OP t1_iuepvgt wrote

All good points and what I already plan/am doing with my 401k, IRA etc. And when I have kids do Term life + continue indexing.

They're old-mindset people. They're afraid of stocks and the idea of losing money in the short term and enjoy the idea of an IUL being life insurance for their remaining life. Even though the IUL is already buying Index's (which are stocks lol) with high costs it won't go negative at least.

1

Reasonable-Program29 OP t1_iueqrek wrote

But from everything here I guess ultimately it won't necessarily hurt them or their current lifestyle if they continue with this? And on the side, I push for them to open an IRA at least and help them pick low-cost indexes. Sounds like the only thing I can help do for them?

1

sonnyfab t1_iuesnic wrote

>it won't necessarily hurt them

They'll be dead. It's you who is being hurt by the insurance company taking your inherence.

2

Reasonable-Program29 OP t1_iuevxi3 wrote

Lmao fair. I don't need nor want their money. Just want them happy with their current lifestyle and that this won't bite them in the ass 14 years later and they're still alive.

1

akmco14 t1_iuf02jt wrote

It might bite them in the ass when they don't have access to the funds if they need them like they would of they put this money in a retirement account.

1