Submitted by badboyzpwns t3_z7ft6z in personalfinance
dslpharmer t1_iy6ihee wrote
Reply to comment by badboyzpwns in Stopping contributions to IRA/401k to save for downpayment? by badboyzpwns
That 15% assumes that your quality of life in retirement won’t plummet and that you may even spend more if you’re traveling and taking up expensive hobbies.
MrBalll t1_iy6jecn wrote
>This. If you only make 40k a year you live off that and that is what you are used to. So no matter what you make per year, you will be comfortable living off the 15% contributed once you reach retirement.
badboyzpwns OP t1_iy6ljyi wrote
Thanks! That makes sense, but why is the number 15%? Is it based on a study like the trinity study? For example, contributing 15% of 40k salary vs 15% of 150k salary, will yield signficiantly different results!
MikeWPhilly t1_iy6v8ju wrote
You seem to be missing that somebody with $150k salary probably spends more day to day than $40k. Generally speaking the goal is to have the same, or better, lifestyle in retirement.
dslpharmer t1_iy7o3up wrote
Has to do with percent of income replaced at retirement with savings, projected spending, and growth assumptions. Fidelity has an article that says the modeled it over $50,000-300,000 per year salary. This is for replacing approximately 45% of income with savings. If I retired today, SS would replace 26% of income.
Most importantly, the general rule is when you make more, you spend more. Car, convenience, house, clothes, food, entertainment, kid activities, vacations, etc. Some of that may diminish when you retire, but to replace a big chunk of income, you want big savings.
badboyzpwns OP t1_iy9jm3r wrote
Thanks! I saw the fidelity article now and it make sense!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments