Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

WizardDresden2192 t1_iy4gk9t wrote

I mean, if she repeated it many times you have to make a decision to give out some information to mark down and have a shot at the job or listen to reddit blindly and have no opportunity of getting it. Obviously you chose the reddit. In the future, be prepared with how much you want and what the current market is for the job you're applying for so you know if you're in that ball park.

If it's a company you really want to work for be prepared to make concessions to reach your goal and know what you're worth.

253

ancient_almiraj t1_iy5ioe0 wrote

To add to this, Definitely do some research and be prepared to offer a figure for what you are looking to make at the new job. Always start with the higher end of your ballpark figure though, companies want to hire cheaper if they can. Also, have a cutoff in mind. You can always counter the offer, but be prepared to walk away if it's below your threshold.

I wouldn't give them my current salary if I could help it though. Usually offering an expected salary is enough. If it's not, I'd think twice about working for that company.

If, for whatever reason, you really want the job and they demand to know your current salary, and offering an expected salary isn't enough. I would tell them it's around the lower end of your ballpark figure (assuming that's higher than your current salary). That way, if they want to hire you, they'll at least think they need to beat that.

41

spammmmmmmmy t1_iy5khjv wrote

>and have no opportunity of getting it

Well, there was a chance she would back down. What chance that was, I wouldn't know...

4

dequeued t1_iy4gino wrote

It's a common negotiation tactic to try to avoid being the first person to give a number and not just in salary negotiations (and the advice is given much more broadly than here in Reddit), but if it's their company policy to require that information, you should have just given it.

> I responded with my prepared Reddit-approved counters. "I am compensated in accordance with market rate for my responsibilities and experience". "I look forward to hearing more about this role's responsibilities before making a decision". "I will consider any offers in line with the market rate for the role".

Yikes. I'm not surprised the HR person got annoyed if you're just robotically replying with prepared counters.

This isn't about not taking Reddit advice, this is about having decent people skills. It's important to read the room and you need to be a bit flexible in a conversation. Illustrating that you are completely inflexible and hold a conversation like a robot is how you get shown the door.

Some of this just comes with more experience, but in the meantime, you might consider doing some salary negotiation "practice" with a friend that's good at this, watch some videos on the topic (avoid clips from movies or television), etc.

195

RepresentativeError8 OP t1_iy54noe wrote

Thanks for the response, it was a good learning experience, and I'll try to be better next time. I do think that I'm missing some of those critical life skills. I come from a very blue collar family, my parents didn't even graduate high school. So I'm hyper aware at those invisible skills that I'm missing.

I feel like I've had a disappointing first decade of working life due to listening to the conventional wisdom of my family and guidance counselors that turned out to be straight incorrect or misleading, or not applicable to life in the 2010s and 2020s.

The people on this sub, /r/financialindepenendence and its variants, subs about engineering or MBAs and so on, seem to be much more confident with their intuitive "map" of which industries provide salary growth and are/will be in demand. Which technical/resume skills will get you there. How to develop the "soft" skills that will keep you there. How to shift your resources to financial instruments that will build wealth. What to do with the question of housing and planning your lifestyle to give yourself the life you want. More so than anyone I've ever spoken to in real life. So I will confess to trying to compensate by following the advice I see here to a large degree.

I'm just thinking out loud, but I guess I have to mentally shift from "I'm taking the general uncontroversial advice" mode - Learn to code, get a stable job, follow the flow chart - these are all things that I had to learn from Reddit. Now I'm moving to the mode where applying advice to my life specifically takes some discretion and I need to allow room for improvisation.

I've learned to ignore the gut feelings I get. Because so far, Reddit's advice has mostly been more correct than the ones I picked up. So when the HR person was pushing me, of course I instinctively wanted to just answer and move it along. But I just kept thinking "No, I've seen comments where people literally say to continue answering robotically and they get 75 upvotes, and they talk about how if you give the first number, you're screwed. My urge to be nice to HR must just be my poverty background talking. The same thing that told me not to ask for a raise, or not to hop jobs for a raise, or not to ask for more responsibility".

Personal problem, I take full responsibility, and I'll try to do better next time.

85

wallet535 t1_iy5gt0i wrote

Just by this response I can see you have the frame of mind (and writing ability) to do very well. You’re definitely on the right path. Reddit and people in general often miss that life is much more shades of gray than black and white. Good luck.

39

SmooshyShway t1_iy5igwu wrote

I think you should seek out real human professional mentors to help guide you. Social media will never be a substitute for that. I’m from a blue collar family and didn’t have those invisible skills either so I created a “personal board of directors” to help me learn them.

Apply to a local leadership program or look through your network on LinkedIn asking one or two people for informational interviews.

33

BoomervsZoomerPPV t1_iy5lyyr wrote

Also want to note that I find reddit financial advice to be mostly geared toward the lowest common denominator. For example 90% of car posts will have “do not finance, only buy what you can afford with cash” as the most upvoted. This isn’t necessarily bad advice, it’s just the safest advice that’s geared towards those who tend to purchase beyond their means. If you have a good stable income/credit to where the interest rate on a new car is lower what you get from HYS or CDs, then buying in cash may not be the best option for you. Simply put, there’s a lot of stuff on Reddit that should not be blanket applied to real life scenarios, and only you can judge what makes sense for you. Lesson learned and best of luck to you.

12

cromulent_weasel t1_iy61i4z wrote

> So when the HR person was pushing me, of course I instinctively wanted to just answer and move it along.

When she said "she couldn't move forward with the interview until she had realistic answers to those questions" I would have responded with "realistic answers to those questions are" and then made up the numbers I wanted them to be. So if for example you would have been happy with $80K, name $80-$100K your expected salary range (since they WILL offer you the floor of your expected range). Basically they are asking you to pick a number that's in their salary band range, and if it's in the upper end of that range you need to qualify it in some way with your skills and experience justifying being above average.

If their salary range is $50-$70K for example, then by naming such a high price you are pricing yourself out of that job and that's probably a good thing.

4

germywormy t1_iy64zp5 wrote

What kind of position are you looking for? I interview people a lot, I'd conduct a mock interview with you if its in my area of expertise.

3

RedeemingChildhood t1_iy5xvap wrote

Hi - just giving my perspective here from someone at a high level in my company, HR background (no longer in HR).

You did the right thing! The ONLY reason they want your current pay is to make you the candidate the lowest offer possible. In most professional companies, they have a hiring range ($40-80k for example). If they find out you are at $30k, they well may offer you $40k and you feel like you have moved up. In reality, your market research would leave you to believe you are worth $50k. They know you are in a bad spot turning down a $40k offer when you are at $30k and may hold firm. Don’t work for these kinds of companies.

2

gclaramunt t1_iy67dvo wrote

exactly, your current salary has nothing to do with what value you can provide to the new company, they only want to know to lowball you.

1

sergius64 t1_iy5z5bo wrote

You might benefit from Toastmasters. It's a great resource for speaking in public and trying stuff like mock interviews, etc. It's all about practice and becoming comfortable in a situation because you've been there - done that.

2

jadepeonyring t1_iy67i6r wrote

You should check out the free HireClub group on Facebook.

I spent almost a year on the free group before paying for a salary negotiation session and a resume review.

The people in the group are often in tech companies and recruiting - and the whole point of the group is to help you get a job with a significant pay rise. Honestly being in the group and quietly reading the posts, especially by Ketan (the founder) redefined my entire mindset around money (salary) and interviews. You are the product of the people you spend time with - and i think you can see that from the Reddit subs that you spend time with. There’s also the question about the interview and HR where they have suggestions on what to say if the recruiter pushes for a range and you could try that. Don’t knock a HireClub coach as well - a coach can help you find jobs within their own network if they think you’re a suitable candidate.

Please don’t be embarrassed that you didn’t read the room. You are feeling self-conscious that it’s because you came from a blue collar family. But what if I told you that everyone makes mistakes when interviewing, including the exact same mistake you did?

Would you then make more excuses and insist it’s because you’re from a blue collar family? Even so-called middle or upper class kids have no idea how to manage interviews or read the room - it’s something that comes with practice and experience for sure.

Brush it off - you’ve been very mature about it, don’t be discouraged!

Also I paid $300 to HireClub to learn that the first thing you should know is that in majority of cases it’s better to hop jobs for a huge raise, and that your company will likely only consider a raise if you come to them with a competitor’s offer IN HAND, and even then it’s unlikely that they will match the competitor’s offer. Plus you’re also setting yourself up for being the next person to be laid off anyway - so…. never ever ger super attached to your company. Know your value and treat your job as a job and try to take away emotions when you’re making a career decision. Your company and bosses are nice to you because they want you to stay for their own benefit.

Also remember - “don’t negotiate against yourself.” and tell yourself you can’t do it before you tried. but i’m sure you know that!

And don’t knock mock interviews - if there are people willing to do mock interviews for free (I saw it in the comments), please take them. Always good to learn and practice (but take people’s comments with a pinch of salt and research it if it’s not common advice).

2

likethebank t1_iy68m5c wrote

I man the future, I would look up the expected salary ranges on the web and provide an “expectation range” based on the results. I agree that you shouldn’t have to share your current salary, but it’s also helpful for both sides to see if expectations are similar on both sides.

The situation sounds like total bullshit. Normally if you are in this situation, they should just give you a wide range based on their own comp research.

2

UndeadOrc t1_iy5x6vm wrote

To be frank, most wording and advice I see on this sub is terrible or disconnected from human interaction. There are great broad takeaways, but sometimes this sub needs to be treated with a grain of salt. You said this was a job you really wanted and in that case, you should've been more lenient especially if you thought there would be a bigger income involved. The type of advice here is typically for a specific type of person and not a broad blanket of most people. If I took this subreddit's advice, I wouldn't have my current job which I really enjoy. Lowkey, this subreddit sometimes feels like WSB without the comedy. It reads like 20 something financier or tech bros simply trying to get the next big check and are playing at professionalism when in reality, there are certain employers who'd flatout reject you by parroting some word choices here. Your poverty background is a survival background and it would've done you favors this time rather than the hardballers some of these folks larp being.

1

WarpTroll t1_iy6aj0z wrote

One thing to remember is that it is easy for someone on the other side of the screen to tell you perfect advise if things work perfectly and to be song and not give in all the whole failing to live up to that or never actually haven taken their own advise.

1

AustinLurkerDude t1_iy6bi0r wrote

>when

I've never known a company where HR are the ones nixing the interview. If you had an onsite interview, I can't imagine HR being able to fail you unless you started spouting racist nonsense.

​

Maybe you already were not gonna get the job and the HR rep was just going through the motions? Don't feel bad, this place probably wouldn't be a good fit if you have to worry about office politics from the first day.

1

teapot-error-418 t1_iy6ecgo wrote

> Personal problem, I take full responsibility, and I'll try to do better next time.

Just a note - taking this approach will take you so far in life. Rather than stubbornly adhering to your preconceived ideas, being able to listen to new information, immediately accept a correction and learn from mistakes will pay dividends.

I've interviewed a lot of people. In general, there are virtually no black-and-white situations that require only one type of response. Always read the room and make sure you're processing what is happening in front of you. Note that this doesn't always mean to change your behavior if you've decided on a course of action - but you should still be aware of what's happening.

In a scenario where an HR person is making blunt demands for information and is appearing annoyed, I would probably at least consider that refusing to provide the information will result in my not getting the job. Basically anything you do to piss people off in the interview process can result in not getting the job.

That doesn't mean, "don't ever piss people off." It just means that you should know it's happening and know the potential outcome. Adjust accordingly.

1

dirtyhandsome t1_iy4gun5 wrote

Reddit’s not always right. I never tell them my current salary but I of course tell them my expected salary to the comma. How else would know how much to pay me? I’m in Europe though, maybe we do it differently (which we actually do since we still require pictures along with applications)

57

TywinShitsGold t1_iy4pk3u wrote

I’m in the US and if I want 125k to change jobs I list 125k. I don’t care. If they won’t match my wants I won’t take the job.

36

also_anon_dc t1_iy62fx8 wrote

It’s pretty common in the US now to not ask/give current salary but salary expectation in your new role should be discussed in the first conversation with a recruiter. I would never waste my time interviewing unless I knew we were all on the same page about salary expectations.

2

Minimum_Slice1001 t1_iy6658x wrote

This whole time I thought it was common practice to just lie and say you make a little bit more and you're looking for a little more than that. It's been my best way to avoid wasting interview time 👍🏼

2

pancak3d t1_iy4h2da wrote

HR probably has a field they are required to populate. If you know what your salary expectation is, and HR is forcing your hand, you can just say it. Add 20% if you want. It's just a number.

I've had many interviews end early because they cannot meet my salary expectations. It's good for both sides because you dont want to waste eachothers time in rounds interviews just to find out they can't pay what you're asking.

50

cavscout43 t1_iy61k80 wrote

My total comp is "what the job is worth to me." Easy commute, remote work, <40 hours a week typically, good culture, etc. Those can all have a subjective value tacked on to them at my discretion if they want to know my current comp / what it would take for me to hop ship.

Recruiters are usually idiots. just walk the dog, give them what they require to get you in front of the hiring manager, and don't think twice about the game you have to play.

2

theoriginalharbinger t1_iy4oaaj wrote

> According to Reddit

There is a lot of Reddit that is full of bad advice, including - given the demographics of the environment - a lot that is based on the notion that employers are inherently adversarial. You should ignore them.

> Did I play this wrong at all? This experience has made me more suspicious of taking Reddit advice that goes against the "real world" common sense grain to be honest.

Yes, you played it wrong.

An employer needs to know roughly what you expect to determine if it's worth the time of their generally well-paid employees to continue interviewing you. If they can't make that assessment, you'll get told to go home.

The average cost of a first-round interview with 4 people involved (a recruiter, an HR person setting the interview, two actual interviewers) is going to be anywhere from $500 to $1,000. It gets more expensive from there.

Next time, have an actual answer, like "I'd expect X to Y dollars depending on benefits and stock plan."

You didn't "dodge a bullet" here, as others are saying. I would never and have never pushed a candidate to a second-round interview if they didn't tell me what they expected to earn in the posting. If I have no hope of matching it, then of course a second round interview would waste everybody's time, and I'm not sure where "Willingness to waste the time of everybody involved" became a hallmark of a good company.

43

itsdan159 t1_iy4ukqt wrote

>An employer needs to know roughly what you expect to determine if it's worth the time of their generally well-paid employees to continue interviewing you. If they can't make that assessment, you'll get told to go home.
>
>The average cost of a first-round interview with 4 people involved (a recruiter, an HR person setting the interview, two actual interviewers) is going to be anywhere from $500 to $1,000. It gets more expensive from there.

Then you'd expect companies would list salary ranges in job listings, but infamously a great many don't. Even if they don't they could have told OP the salary they'd expect to pay based on their first round interview, which would have accomplished the very same thing you mention. It may not be adversarial to the degree people act like it is, but it's absolutely self-serving the way they do things.

15

theoriginalharbinger t1_iy4v5o7 wrote

The "right" answer to all the above is to just do the research. Most good jobs have some combination of salary, bonus, commission, stock/RSU, retirement, etc. A 100k straight salary job is not as good as 80k straight / 40k variable, so listing out salary is not as easy as people make it seem.

7

OneAdvertising9821 t1_iy521a1 wrote

> listing out salary is not as easy as people make it seem

It's pretty easy. My company has standard ranges for base salary, bonus target and equity. We absolutely could post those ranges. We don't because we think we have an advantageous negotiating position without sharing the range.

7

retrovaporizer t1_iy5ozu3 wrote

while youre not wrong that companies hold a lot of the cards, forcing a range in a job posting dosent necessarily solve anything. in states where this has become law, many now just say the range is "$1 - $200,000" (or whatever)

the reality too is that a high value candidate who knows their market worth can probably demand ABOVE what a company would otherwise be willing to post/pay. wheras a more inexperienced person who they see promise in they may be willing to take a chance on, but for a lesser salary. theres also no way to account someone whos under-performing in a role and not getting regular raises and is on the lower end of the salary band vs someone who is killing it and is getting tons of offers and who the employer is desperately trying to hang on to because theyre critical to client success. i guess what im saying is, a role can say its "range" is $100k-150k, but ultimately a good candidate knows what they are worth and why they are entitled to it and will make that case directly to the hiring manager either way.

1

Slammedtgs t1_iy57t0m wrote

A current role I’m have open has a $50k range from bottom to top for the position. If I tell all candidates the range they will only see the high end. It’s a double edged sword.

5

sudifirjfhfjvicodke t1_iy5dp22 wrote

Exactly. And as a potential employee, if you give an expected salary range, the company is only going to try to pay the bottom of that range because that's what they think you'll be willing to accept.

1

Slammedtgs t1_iy5enms wrote

Your second point may be true some or even most companies. If I have a that is at the bottom end of my range but see potential I’ll pay them more. Having someone join to leave in 18 months isn’t worth a few grand of savings. However, if a can didn’t doesn’t know their own value or the state of the market that’s another problem entirely.

1

Nuttycomputer t1_iy6ywd9 wrote

Why not just pay people the same? My company made this move. We just don’t have ranges anymore. You have title x you are paid y. End of story.

1

cromulent_weasel t1_iy628tt wrote

> Then you'd expect companies would list salary ranges in job listings

There's value in information asymmetry. If you don't know, you might spin too high, in which case, have a nice day, they lose nothing. But if you offer a low salary, then score, that's a massive win for them. Your only recourse is going to be jumping to a better job.

1

Cautious_General_177 t1_iy52l25 wrote

While the desire for expected or desired salary is easily justifiable, I have an issue with them needing to know OPs current (or most recent) salary. There's no reason for that unless they truly want to offer just enough to get them to jump ship while still underpaying them.

2

spysnipedis t1_iy4gpby wrote

Lol, you messed up. A lot of companies have a hard starting point on salaries, they just want to know if you will be OK with that number and not waste time with someone wanting 20k a year more. If I asked that question and got your answers I would be like this guy can't answer a simple question why should he work here when all his answers sound like some YouTube police audit guy

32

NotQuiteGoodEnougher t1_iy4trt1 wrote

And a lot of states (40%) specifically made it illegal for employers to ask your past salary history. So it's important to know what state the OP is in. Because there are many employers breaking the law, that are either doing it accidently or on purpose.

17

reclaimingmytime t1_iy67r0p wrote

Absolutely this. It’s not like HR has no idea what the position is worth. They can throw out a range to see if you’re both aligned.

If they want you to name your current salary, it’s so they can lowball you, period. And as far as I’m concerned, OP dodged a major bullet. There’s a reason this shit is illegal—it’s exploitative as hell.

Employers are the ones hiring, they can name their range. And if they refuse to—wtf are they hiding?

1

Brincey0 t1_iy558r5 wrote

>It's more than just wanting to know whether a candidate is in range for the role, otherwise they would state the range. It's also to avoid paying far more than a previous salary.

6

RickDripps t1_iy53nb4 wrote

This is a fantastic example of why Reddit's advice needs to be seen through the lens of "this person desperately wants to be right" instead of "these guys know exactly what to do".

I've been asked this in interviews and ALWAYS answered. The actual salary answer I give may not be completely accurate (I include bonuses and everything I can fabricate to get it to where I need to be) but the salary expectation always is.

Lesson learned on this one. Reddit is fantastic for opinions but it's also filled with people pretending to be experts just because they've read other advice and are acting like they've applied it in real life without actually doing so. They're so eager to be the one giving out pearls of wisdom that they disregard any caution in doing so.

Sorry man, it's not something obvious to know and interviews/situations are very fluid. You could send a thank-you letter back with the salary information and also an apology saying something to the effect of "I was given painfully bad advice by a friend that I didn't realize wasn't professional until reaching out to more credible sources. I am excited about this opportunity so if there's any chance to amend this then please let me know!"

It never hurts, especially if it's a job you'd really like. The apology would go a long way for potentially future applications/positions too.

20

RepresentativeError8 OP t1_iy55fte wrote

Ah yes, I just posted a comment that kind of went into that:

https://www.reddit.com/r/personalfinance/comments/z715eo/a_job_interview_ended_because_i_refused_to_tell/iy54noe/

I need to do a better job of learning how to take this advice from Reddit.

5

RickDripps t1_iy57jj4 wrote

You're beating yourself up a little in that comment. Overall, you've got the good attitude. People think of HR like "They're your enemy, not your friend." when it really should be "They're protecting the company's interest but just pretend your interests are align with theirs and you'll get along just fine."

I'd still consider sending that thank-you letter with the salary info. The HR person will probably never see you again after the interview so there's a pretty high chance you can lose a little pride today and never hear about it again.

I've messed up a few interviews myself and the awkward moments still haunt me to this day... It sounds like you're crushing it in many aspects of self-improvement so don't get discouraged.

9

woodstock99forlyfe t1_iy4lf1o wrote

I won't give my current salary but I will always provide a target. You want to make sure you are in the same ballpark before you waste time on 3 interviews.

Now the number you throw out should be what you actually want plus like 10 or 20% so you have negotiation room though.

19

sephiroth3650 t1_iy52m6o wrote

I think the biggest issue here is that you didn't read the room. Ideally, sure. You don't jump to giving numbers out. Your pre-prepared answers were OK. But based on your description, there was a point where the HR person was making it clear to you that they were looking for actual numbers from you. In my opinion, this would have been the time to pivot, and throw out some numbers on what your salary expectations were. I'd have said something along the lines of "Based on market rates for this position, and factoring in my current salary, I would need a salary of X in order to justify leaving my current position." Something along those lines. Instead, you stuck to the generic advice of not giving any ground. This particular employer called that bluff.

14

JAJM_ t1_iy50oa9 wrote

Yea you see your mistake was that you applied Reddit to real life.

13

liltonk t1_iy4godw wrote

It's realistic to at least provide a range, make that range favorable to you though. Negotiations can then start. It makes no sense to interview someone if their earning expectations are beyond what the employer is willing to provide, so this makes sense on their part.

7

NotQuiteGoodEnougher t1_iy4k53g wrote

What State did this occur in?

Specifically, AL, CA, CO, CT, DE, DC, HI, IL, ME, MA, MD, NJ, NY, NC, OR, PA (state agencies only), VT, VA and WA.

If you're in any of those states, you need to call the labor board in your state and file a report. In those states it's strictly illegal to ask for your past salary history, let alone make it a condition of continuing an interview.

Not sure about the downvotes, OP indicated he was asked salary history. Which depending upon where it occurred could be illegal.

7

yeah87 t1_iy4tsz4 wrote

Most people are focusing on the salary expectations part, which is legal and normal.

5

NotQuiteGoodEnougher t1_iy4uevv wrote

Op made it clear the expectation from the interview was that salary history was to be provided.

If I was OP I would have countered that I want the range.

Luckily I live in a state that's very serious about this. Employers are required to provide the range, and are prohibited from requesting my salary history.

4

Urban_Disaster t1_iy5chfb wrote

This right here. If it was one of these states, you need to take further action.

−1

Global-Ear-4934 t1_iy4s92m wrote

Why is the onus on the candidate to state what salary they are looking for rather than the company to state what the position will pay?

5

yeah87 t1_iy4u4cb wrote

It's not necessarily. But OP completely shut down any chance of conversation. They could have turned it around on the employer and asked what was budgeted but they didn't.

7

danfirst t1_iy60qtz wrote

Having gone through a lot of interviews in the last few months, that's exactly what I did. When I was asked what I was looking for, I just asked if they could share the approved range with me. Out of all of them, only 1 said they couldn't and needed me to give a range first. I think just saying you refuse definitely gives an adversarial vibe where you can typically turn around the question and get the info you want anyway.

2

remembersomething t1_iy4ib8z wrote

Each subs got a different demographic, same with reddit as a whole or source of media. Unfortunately you didn't read the person and doubled down on advice that wasn't suited no matter how many up votes. It's life.. Not reddit. Hopefully a life lesson learnt though?

4

[deleted] t1_iy4q77f wrote

I usually ask what’s budgeted. Then they either tell me or force my hand and if they force my hand I just say a number that’s higher than what I’d actually want and hope for the best. My current job actually went $20k above what I said I’d need to leave my last job.

4

Due-Ad-8743 t1_iy5cpou wrote

No, it’s a company you don’t want to work for.

4

BlazeDemBeatz t1_iy5n6pc wrote

This. Everyone saying he blew it, is misleading him. They clearly wanted to lowball OP, and he knows his worth…

I’ve been there before. There will be another opportunity somewhere better.

2

Due-Ad-8743 t1_iy5onat wrote

Yeah I’ve been on both sides of the desk. You get hired, you show you’re the greatest employee ever, you get a percentage raise off the low ball. If I don’t see a salary range, I don’t bother. As you said, plenty of good companies

2

kkinderen t1_iy5xbc3 wrote

Is this for real or am I falling for some sort of joke?

I think you followed some poor advice, particularly if your actual response was "I am compensated in accordance with the market rate..." If you said something like that to me, I'd say thank you. Good bye.

If you want to play games like that, better to just get a good job at a salary you can negotiate and then head out on interviews with that line. Who knows. You might get lucky.

4

AlissonLeech t1_iy4h4fd wrote

I always tell them at least $5k over my current salary as my actual salary. Works out well.

3

Rxpert83 t1_iy52qy3 wrote

They can verify current salary in many states.

0

AlissonLeech t1_iy55gsu wrote

Oh we all know what each other are paid already. My field is very small. $5k over isn't a big stretch and highly possible.

1

fwambo42 t1_iy67jtm wrote

this is also pretty easy to manipulate, too. for example, I can tell them my salary and include my annual bonus. I don't need to share that specific detail, though. it's all in the interpretation

1

shadracko t1_iy4n0hb wrote

Lying is a dangerous tactic.

−13

brogrammableben t1_iy4nmpg wrote

Tell that to corporations that lie to employees and candidates all the time.

12

shadracko t1_iy4p4gm wrote

I don't deny that, but I don't think lying back is a fruitful approach.

−7

TywinShitsGold t1_iy4pv3k wrote

$5k over may be a fair estimate of benefits like employer match, employer contribution to insurance, HSA, perks.

I get an annual breakdown and it’s at least $5k over my salary number.

2

shadracko t1_iy4u970 wrote

$5k is likely a massive underestimate of all benefits. I have no problem with being honest, adding those all in and saying "my total compensation package is worth $xx annually".

3

TywinShitsGold t1_iy4z67n wrote

Yeah I include all my casual work travel that I enjoy in my “benefits calculator” which is like an additional 15k/year on top of my employers “total spend on associate” breakdown.

1

ScarletFire21 t1_iy5gyg5 wrote

I always just say that my current salary is higher than it actually is. If we are getting to this point, they’ve usually already talked to my prior manager. People also like to haggle——when I sold a car on Craigslist, I wanted $4k for it, but I listed it as $6.3k so that when the buyers came and started doing the haggle dance, I played along and made them feel like they were getting a deal. We both “won”.

3

jaywally855 t1_iy67tjn wrote

Yeah, you played it wrong. Contrary to the mentality of people in some of the subReddits, here, employers are not your parents, and will have definite limits of what they will put up with.

Frankly, if I was interviewing someone for a job, and I did not NEED you, I would have kicked you to the curb as well.

Next time, if they are pushing for something like that, just make some shit up.

3

Cautious_General_177 t1_iy5262i wrote

I think there's two points to consider.

First is the request for your current salary. In several states it's actually illegal to ask that (I'm assuming you're not in one of those), but regardless, there's a polite way of saying that's not relevant if you don't want to disclose it. If this causes the company to back out, you probably dodged a bullet.

Second is the request for your desired salary. You should have done some research and had a ballpark figure to offer. At the very least, say something like, "I would like to earn something in the $X-Y range, but that's flexible depending on the benefits package." If you're not willing to even do this, the company likely dodged a bullet.

2

BitterPillPusher2 t1_iy56ph8 wrote

Where are you located? In about half the country, it's illegal to ask how much you are currently making. Even if you are located where it's legal, I HATE this question and advise people to not answer it. But I don't advise people to just not answer at all. You should respond with the salary you are seeking like, "Based on market rates and my experience, I am seeking a salary of $X." Like a real number based upon the market rate of similar positions in your area and your experience. It is a waste of everyone's time to proceed if you will not accept anything under $150K, but they are unable to offer anything over $120K. If you are eventually offered a position, and find out during the process that it will involve more responsibilities than you realized, then negotiate based on that. But don't just not answer the question at all.

So while I get and appreciate you not wanting to disclose what you are currently making, since it's really only used to low-ball people on offers, I don't understand why you refused to offer your salary expectations, as I don't see any reason to not give that information.

FWIW, I've worked in HR for decades.

2

tratata1973 t1_iy5e8df wrote

This is your lesson not to take advice from people who don't care about you personally. People usually give advice based on THEIR experience, which may or may not apply to you. If you are moving to a company that pays higher than the current one, and you really want to work for them anyway, that means they hold all the cards. In what world does it make sense to "stand your ground" when you have 0 cards in your hand? We don't negotiate for the sake of negotiating, we negotiate for our goals using the leverage i have. You had no leverage and negotiating was against your goals, yet you went and negotiated anyway, so they told you to walk. It's not a big deal, there is nothing to be shocked or dismayed about. Just pick yourself up, dust yourself off, remove the unrealistic assumptions about the world that you seem to be carrying with you to these interviews, and carry on interviewing.

2

kikifloof t1_iy5k4mb wrote

I've hired a lot of people in my career, and I completely understand why someone would want to keep their salary and even their salary expectations private. However, I also have a hiring budget and there are limits on what I can realistically offer. If someone wants 120k and my budget maximum is 90k, there is no reason to continue the dialogue. Some companies have flexibility, other companies don't. It's also highly role-dependent, some roles can basically name their price, others not so much. I definitely recommend at least having a ball-park in mind.

2

Gremloch t1_iy5rwnc wrote

What POSSIBLE reason other than "We won't hire you because it will be too much of a raise for a peasant like you" could a company have for wanting your CURRENT salary?

0

EthanFl t1_iy68cjk wrote

Very normal.

Some recruiting processes have canidate selection spreadsheets that need to be filled out. This is part of their decision making and a means of accountability for the recruiter.

By playing it coy, the recruiter couldn't fill out the form so therefore rejected you outright.

I've rejected dozens of entry level candidates over the years for incomplete/inaccurate applications.

2

rude-red-panda t1_iy68hd2 wrote

I can see not telling them your current salary, but you did t even tell them your salary expectations? Did you ask what the salary range for the position was? idk man, your heart is in the right place but I feel like there are more nuanced ways to navigate this.

2

caroline_elly t1_iy6ambr wrote

Don't ever trust Reddit. Many Redditors are just kids fantasizing about sticking it to employers,

Sometimes, there are mutually beneficial things to do, like giving a salary range to save people time. You don't need to stick it to employers to further your own career goals.

2

Knipfty t1_iy4xp94 wrote

Unless you work in a jurisdiction that outlaws the question, I would answer it.

So yes, you got bad advice. Learn from this. Salary negotiation is a give and take exercise with 3 outcomes

  1. You both agree on a price
  2. Your price is too high
  3. Their price is too low

They have their policies, and you gave them no reason to change them. So, they walked away.

1

Rxpert83 t1_iy4zumf wrote

Flip, it back on them. Ask the range allocated for the role, and if it's in line with expectations say you're confident we can come to an agreement.

1

BillZZ7777 t1_iy50myn wrote

In the past couple years we've been specifically told that we are not allowed to ask what someone makes, that we can only ask what they are looking for. I ask for a ball park range when I am hiring because I don't have time to waste on people trying to convince me they should get $200k a year which is more than I make and more than my manager probably makes. I guess since I am personable, they usually tell me or give me some clue. Say the job target is $125, I tell them, "hey, I'm not trying to low ball you, I just want to make sure we're not wasting each others time. I have people come in and tell me something out of line like they need $150 to make a move so it doesn't make sense to continue. If you tell me you need $100k to make the move, and you are qualified , you will be very happy with our offer." Usually that gets the conversation going and they give me a hint.

Here's a link to the states that ban asking for salary history: https://www.paycor.com/resource-center/articles/states-with-salary-history-bans/#:~:text=An%20employer%20or%20employment%20agency%20cannot%20ask%20a,able%20to%20ask%20about%20your%20current%20salary%20expectations.

1

HustlaOfCultcha t1_iy52eat wrote

Never give out your current salary. That's not what this interview is about. Employees often forget that the entire 'getting a job' thing is one big negotiation when you boil it all down. It's not about 'being a team player', 'getting your foot in the door' or 'doing what's best for the company.' It's simply about 'here's work that needs to be done, here's why I can do that work for you and here's how much $$$ I'm willing to do it for and how much $$$ you're willing to pay for that work to be done.'

What your current employer pays you is none of their business. It's about what this company is willing to pay me for my work. The only way I'd give out my current salary is if the company tells me what their end budget is for that particular position. Otherwise if they insist or find that it is a turn-off, they aren't worth working for and they can go pound sand.

But keeping with the negotiation theme, it's perfectly okay to give your salary expectations because that's about half of what you're negotiating. It's just that if you want to win the negotiation, your goal is to get the company to tell you what their salary is for the position *first*. It's just difficult to get that because most companies know that is a way to lose a negotiation and that they have more leverage in the situation.

When I tell them my expectations I tell them a little more than what I am looking for. If I'm looking for $100K, I will say to the effect 'I'm looking for around $105K, but I would be willing to negotiate in the end. Am I somewhere in the ballpark with that figure?'

If you know your market and your market value they may come back and say 'well, that's a little higher than we were expecting.' And the reply to that is just to reiterate that you're willing to negotiation if the opportunity looks like the right fit. If they say that is well outside their budget then it wasn't the right company for you and just move on.

But in the end, you had every right to not tell them your current salary. It's none of their business.

1

TallMushroom8575 t1_iy591fg wrote

It’s a learning experience.

I’m general, yes, don’t bring up salary yourself at an interview. And if asked, it’s best to either first say “willing to consider a reasonable Offer” or “considering offers over $xx”. Don’t give an absolute amount unless you are really pushed to.

I’d you progress to an in-person interview, it’s a good idea to have a rough idea of what you’d be ok with (salary + bonus + health benefits).

1

bx10455 t1_iy5b2o7 wrote

>This experience has made me more suspicious of taking Reddit advice

As my momma once told me... "free advice is worth what you paid for it". Sticking to your guns is one thing but being able to read the room and decide the best course of action will do you best.

1

dlwcpa62 t1_iy5chbk wrote

You, and only you, can make the decision as to sharing comp history and/or putting a future comp expectation on the table being proper in the given situation. The rest of us offer opinions based on limited scenario information and playing arm chair QB. No right / wrong answer on how you handled it. Learn from the experience and good luck moving forward.

1

leafinthepond t1_iy5dd8h wrote

The reddit advice is correct that if you can get away with it, not stating a salary expectation and making the employer give the first number is likely to get you a higher salary. But of course the employer knows this too and wants to pay as little as possible, which is why they try to get you to give the first number. So it comes down to who has the most power in the negotiation. In most industries at most times, the employer has way more power than the employee and can just refuse to hire someone who won’t give a number because there are plenty of other candidates, as you discovered. But a disproportionate number of reddit users work in software engineering and related fields, and until recently employees in those fields had a lot of leverage when it comes to salary negotiations like this, which is probably where the advice comes from. Basically, this is good advice if you know there are lots of companies that would want to hire you, because it will maximize your salary at the risk of potentially shutting the door at one company. It’s not good advice if you really want to work at a particular company and aren’t trying to maximize your salary or expect to have few options.

1

Socksmaster t1_iy5e32j wrote

  1. When it comes to people interactions such as with jobs, relationships, friendships where the redditors ask of you to be the "tough guy"...never listen to reddit. So many people here glamourize what really happen and lie.
  2. If an interviewer doubles down on a question, that means they really want an answer give it them the true answer or lie.
  3. If you really want something and its going to benefit you, sometimes you gotta take a hit. Lets say you really got paid 30 an hour and because of that they offered 35 an hour when they really were prepared to give you 40 an hour...well at least you got a raise and you can move up the next time.
  4. Be polite at all times during an interview. Anything you say in a negative tone, any vague answer you give will be multiplied times 10 in how they look at you.
1

GalianoGirl t1_iy5fvc1 wrote

You made a mistake.

Brigette Hyacinth is on YouTube and LinkedIn and has great videos on interview tips.

1

posttrumpzoomies t1_iy5gg7n wrote

Yeah I'd have ended it too. If a salesperson or whoever is giving me runaround non-answers like that, c-ya.

1

lostSockDaemon t1_iy5ghh9 wrote

Did they explain why? It's very odd to me that they need your current comp.

1

rando24183 t1_iy5gn83 wrote

Where are you located? Your location can make a difference. For example, in some states in the US, refusal to disclose the salary range when you asked is illegal and can get that company in big trouble with labor boards. But that is not the case everywhere.

Going forward, I recommend you first look up salary transparency laws for where you live and where the company is based. Then use that information to decide how tough of a stance feels comfortable for you. For me, I live in an area with salary transparency, so I would refuse, state the law, refuse again, and finally report the company if they still did not comply. But, I have the law on my side.

1

Doff6 t1_iy5iplk wrote

Yes, you made a mistake. Any sort of reddit advice should always be qualified with "Your milage may vary" because there are few rules that are universal.However once you mentioned the interviewer was "getting annoyed" you were probably done, since the HR person probably flagged you as difficult/ refused to answer "simple" questions.

Once it started into a back and force you should have either answered.

  1. If your state allows them to validate it with your current employer: then you should answer honestly.
  2. If your state doesn't, then you could give a number which "is in line with market rate for your responsibilities and experience"
1

Leading-Hat7789 t1_iy5jqrs wrote

I’ve been on both sides of the table. For me, I always offer my current salary. There is no need to go through the whole interview process is salary expectations are not in line. Also, it seems oddly evasive if hiding your salary expectations is not done properly. If you are planning not to share, have a well-rehearsed reason for why not.

1

djdood0o0o t1_iy5lcx9 wrote

Surprised no one has said send them an email telling them you're salary expectations and see if they still come back to you.

1

Manbearfig01 t1_iy5mg82 wrote

There’s a lot of folks that seem sure fire on here, doesn’t mean they’re right. In my experience, take it or leave it, it only helps to disclose the amount you are looking for and being payed. You can always say that you are due for a review and raise at you current job and are expecting x amount, which should be in the ballpark of what you are looking to get paid at a new job. Sure it’s your right to not give out that info, but consider beyond that if it’s really going to benefit you at all to do so, or if you’re only doing it based off some shit you read online. In the end this is a learning experience and I hope you find the job and pay you are looking for.

1

Mr_Candlestick t1_iy5opu6 wrote

As a hiring manager I'd be furious if a grunt from HR took it upon herself to send a candidate packing like that.

I would have just lied about my current salary to prevent them from low balling me. But if you're more of a boy scout than I am, just because they know what your current salary is doesn't mean you have to bend on what your expectations are. If they don't meet your expectations, they don't meet your expectations, so then you walk.

1

RogueAgent1990 t1_iy5t514 wrote

Went better than my interview , I went for a sales job with an office supplies company and when I told them I expected $250,000 a year their jaws practically hit the floor , I mean INFLATION guys , they asked an honest question , I gave an honest answer and they said get out 🙄🙄.

1

bros402 t1_iy5u5zf wrote

next time, unless it's public knowledge, you can always inflate your current salary a bit

1

sacing t1_iy5uis5 wrote

In some states it is illegal to disqualify individuals for not giving salary info

1

Substantial_Shoe_360 t1_iy5wiki wrote

Had a coworker get a job that was supposed to be high salary and when she saw her paycheck it was not. The company hired her at her previous employers pay.

1

fwambo42 t1_iy66m5m wrote

uhh, shouldn't she have received an offer letter indicating this BEFORE she got her paycheck?

1

rabbit_hole86 t1_iy5x06i wrote

For every complex problem, there is a simple and wrong answer.

For what it's worth, I think it's great that you are out there practicing and learning by trial and error; it takes time to learn the art of people skills and negotiation. Just thinking off the cuff here, but it seems to me there is a spectrum for how hard or soft one would want to negotiate depending on the specific situation, and it certainly takes into account how badly you want/need the job versus how badly the potential employer wants/needs you and what bargaining leverage each of you has. Given that this HR person easily ended the conversation, it tells me that they have other viable candidates and were ready and willing to move on if an applicant is not willing to acquiesce in this particular instance.

1

maacka t1_iy60wsh wrote

It's normal. I get why you don't want to tell them your current salary but why not tell the expectations? It's a waste of time for you and the company if they can't offer what you think you deserve for that job. In any case, you can say your expectation salary and tell them you are flexible with other offer if it's reasonable for the tasks to be done. Before to give a estimate salary, do some research about how much it's a reasonable salary for the amount of task of the job and see if you need more or not.

1

cromulent_weasel t1_iy615el wrote

I had an interview for a permanent position in the team I had been contracting for. To make it harder, one of my (junior) coworkers was on the interview panel. When the HR person asked me what my salary expectations were, rather than name any numbers (which would have caused friction since I was making significantly more that the person in my team on the interview) my response was "I know what the salary bands for POSITION and senior POSITION are. I think with my skills and experience I am in the middle to slightly above the midpoint of the senior POSITION salary band."

My team lead was really happy with that response and the offer I got was at the top of the senior POSITION band.

1

Baxford1020 t1_iy628oq wrote

I don't believe she has any way of knowing your actual current salary. In that scenario, I'd simply say a current salary within 15% to 25% of my new salary expectations. Moreover, your expected salary is something you should be aware of from your own market research. Some professions early on in your career may require some guess work. You need to say a number you're happy with. I've said a number 10 to 15% higher many times. If they are interested in you as a candidate, they will work with you.

1

strangescript t1_iy63w16 wrote

Knowing salary expectations is important when interviewing for skill based jobs. Interviewing people is not free for companies and if there isn't a realistic expectation that we can afford you then there is no reason to waste interviewers' time.

1

Minimum_Slice1001 t1_iy65jlt wrote

Not sure what the job was but ya you definitely played that one wrong. You can just add 10-20k to what you're making and say it's your current salary and you're looking for 10-20% more.

1

Shoesietart t1_iy662u3 wrote

You were right not to provide your current salary, because it's not relevant. If pressed, I would have given a range for the new role.

1

limitless__ t1_iy66mqg wrote

"it's common advice that you should never give your current salary or salary expectations in an interview"

That's the goal. But it's not black and white. The entire process is a dance. If you show up with clown shoes on and stomp on their toes they're going to show you the door. You need to learn to play the game, do the dance and turn it to your advantage.

1

blny99 t1_iy67gdu wrote

Ok to give salary expectations “based on your current understanding of the role”. If it turns out to be way different than initially presented, you can tell them at time of any offer that you feel the job requires more and should pay more.

1

Gesha24 t1_iy67tz3 wrote

Most important thing to learn from this lesson: it's important to not only read the advice, but also to understand why certain advice is given. In your example, the recommendation is to not share salary (be it current or desired) is there to avoid getting a low offer. But if you have done research and know how much the position is worth, there's no harm at all in sharing your desired salary in that range.

And then never forget that recruiters are humans. In good companies, recruiters are actually pretty good humans. Good companies understand that giving a candidate an offer below market rate is the easiest path towards attrition issues. So they are not trying to screw you over. Twice already I have said to a different recruiters "I would accept the offer as it is, but I would highly appreciate it the numbers were a little higher" and twice I got a better offer (if you read Reddit you would think this can never ever happen). So read the people, read the company. Lots of crappy places out there, but lots of decent ones too - so don't go into conversation with hr as a battle, rather a discussion with a human being where you can learn more about company and they can learn about you.

1

cardiaccrusher t1_iy6c8az wrote

Interestingly, in some places it’s actually against the law to ask people their current salary - and in some places, the salary range for the position must be posted.

It’s a shame when companies want all of the information and aren’t willing to meet the candidate halfway. Those are usually the companies not really worth working for.

1

Cautious-Draft-8732 t1_iy6cklg wrote

OP, many companies have policy that they are not suppose to ask your current comp and you are not entitled to answer that as well but if a recruiter is crossing the line by asking your salary and If a candidate is throwing a rehearsed line, I am not surprised they ended the call. Try to rephrase that and deviate from the topic instead of repeating the similar response. Regarding your expectations, instead of saying, i’ll make determination later, give them the salary range for the position you are applying and add say, you will be able to provide better and more accurate number once you have detailed understanding of the role and responsibilities.

1

milolai t1_iy6d6tv wrote

"According to Reddit, that's what they always say and you need to stand firm."

&#x200B;

:/

1

travbart t1_iy6e966 wrote

Many job applications request you to list your current salary, so if you don't you run the risk of submitting an incomplete application. It is what it is. Maybe they'll lowball you if they see you haven't made much at the current job, who knows. Biggest thing on salary expectations is to bet on yourself and shoot high. They will never offer you more than you quote them unless they're somehow obligated to. Worst they can do is laugh at you and not offer you the job. More likely they'll laugh at you and offer you something lower than you quoted but possibly still acceptable to you. I learned this the hard way when a less experienced candidate made more than I did because they requested an outrageous starting salary for the industry.

1

Scat_fiend t1_iy6jfhc wrote

I once told them I wasn’t allowed to discuss salary. There was something about it written in my contract.

1

[deleted] t1_iy59lhs wrote

[removed]

0

Most-Storm-6577 t1_iy52j91 wrote

Seems like you lack critical thinking.

Should take every advice on Reddit with a grain of salt, as it's most likely be not applicable to your situation or broadly exaggerated, particularly in subreddit such as /antiwork.

You definitely played this wrong and as other comments posted, many of the advices on Reddit are from young people that are very adversarial towards employers, and obviously that's not applicable in real world, especially when you land higher paying jobs.

−1

Opening-Friend-3963 t1_iy59jwi wrote

Yea I think you screwed the pooch on this one. How can they proceed if you won't tell them how much you expect to earn? You gotta give up some info at least

−3

jlcnuke1 t1_iy5ik1r wrote

In precisely 0 interviews have I ever told anyone how much I expect to earn. I've received multiple job offers despite that. In fact, I've never been asked what I want to earn by a company. They all know what they're willing to pay and that's enough for them to evaluate my skills, education, experience and determine where in their pay range they've been willing to offer me compensation.

Some of those companies have given offers that I find/found reasonable/acceptable, others did not. None have been significantly more than I was looking for.

1

RapDangerous t1_iy5z7ls wrote

Its quite common for an employer to ask what is your salary expectations. So you see, I've had the opposite experience where all the companies ask me what is my expected salary range. Different people, different places....its different anyplace you go. My advice stands and its obvious from the comments its expected they ask what you expect to be paid. So eh, each has their own experience dont they.

1

jlcnuke1 t1_iy62h8x wrote

See, and I was reading the comments and getting that it was generally not expected they ask what you expect to get paid, or if they did, they'd be happy with something generic like "in line with market value for the position and my experience" (as they'd then realize that you aren't stupid and both of you probably know what a fair pay for the position is and will almost certainly be able to come to an equitable agreement on pay and compensation).

If not, honestly, I'd generally assume the employer is stupid or shitty if they're asking such a question to potential employees.

  1. If they don't know what they should be offering for the position, they're probably stupid and you probably don't want to work for them since working for stupid employers is generally a pretty big headache. BLS data and tons of other resources are available for them to discover what fair pay is for 99.999% of positions out there.
  2. If they're not stupid, then they're hoping you are and trying/hoping to underpay you from the start of your relationship with them. That would make them shitty from the start of your relationship with them, and that's not a company you should probably want to work for either.
1

shadracko t1_iy4gs6n wrote

Probably you dodged a bullet and it's better to find a different company. when this question comes up, you do need to understand that refusing to answer may have some small chance of them rejecting you for that reason. You sort of need to weigh that possibility against how excited you are to work for the company.

−7

WhileNotLurking t1_iy4gn7c wrote

Or you dodged a bullet.

They likely were exactly the type of firm to low ball you and waste your time and energy. You just cut to the chase and can now find a job that is worth your time.

−8

itsdan159 t1_iy4tli2 wrote

Yeah don't like their time wasted but I wouldn't be surprised if they only stated 'competetive rates' in the job listing

2