Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

NoFilterNoLimits t1_iyds3b6 wrote

Sometimes taking entry level jobs is a good financial choice because of the growth potential in the career. So I’m not sure I agree with your decision to ignore the career field your existing degrees opened for you.

4

gangstashit818 t1_iydw8mm wrote

I already made the switch. It hurt my pay rate but my back feels a lot better

2

NoFilterNoLimits t1_iydwe0k wrote

Awesome. Then I’d just focus on excelling in your current role & always looking for better jobs in the field

2

Vast_Agency_133 t1_iydtdbo wrote

It seems like its the experience, not the education, you are lacking. I would take an entry level gig for the growth potential.

You've been a line cook which means you can grind through some shitty situations. Put in the work at entry level for 1-2 years and work your way up from there

3

Sheppard47 t1_iydzk79 wrote

You need to move, despite what I already have seen posted here (and everyone’s favorite anecdotes) the biological sciences pay quite well without a PhD. A ms in chem is a solid 60k a year at any manufacturer plant. The work is boring and a grind. However there is a lot of viable career growth. You just need to live near somewhere that manufacturers. Then you can pivot into another role, whatever suits you. I have a BS in chem, nothing else. I make mid 90s, and have been in industry about 2 years. Biologics and pharma are still booming despite other industries slowing down. Stay away from academia, my guess is that’s what you have seen. Those places do pay barely over minimum wage, and there is no growth. Those are filled with people needing pubs for graduate school applications. You have a very employable degree, use it.

2

gangstashit818 t1_iye09e4 wrote

I live in Los Angeles and work in aerospace as an analytical chemist and make $20/hr

1

Sheppard47 t1_iye12io wrote

That’s wildly underpaid, we start junior chemists at 30/hr. Fresh out of undergrad with 0 experience. A analytical lab chemist, mid level, should be 80-100k a year. Maybe it’s your area, or maybe aerospace pays less than Pharma. Also, LA is not a manufacturing hub for Pharma, so not a good place to be a chemist. I’m east coast, and always have been, so can’t speak to your area. I can say everywhere I have been pays more in lower COL areas.

1

gangstashit818 t1_iye1s4l wrote

Takeda pharmaceutical and Amgen biopharmaceutical are both a 20 minute drive from where I live. Applied to both probably 100 times and can't get an interview.

1

Sheppard47 t1_iye38a9 wrote

Very odd, maybe get some one to check your resume. Also, Takeda is headquartered in boston, and has sites around the world. LA might very well be saturated and more difficult to get a job with no experience. May be that is the case in general in LA. Again, I am a life long east coast guy.

It might be worth while to pursue larger manufacturing sites where less talent is located.

2

gangstashit818 t1_iye40gb wrote

Those both sound like fantastic ideas. I hate this city anyway lol. It's so overcrowded and dirty. I'm going to start applying in other locations and get some professional resume help.

2

Sheppard47 t1_iye4v1g wrote

That is wonderful, for areas to look I can tell you the greater Boston area and RTP in NC seem to be nuts lately. I get recruiters with roles in that area regularly. If either of those interest you I think you have good odds.

Also, for entry level QC labs are always hiring. They also LOVE analytical chemists. Anyone who is good at plate based assays and some instrumentation.

QC can be soul sucking but a great way into industry.

2

IndexBot t1_iyf4m8h wrote

Please note that in order to keep this subreddit a high-quality place to discuss personal finance, off-topic or low-quality posts are removed (rule 3).

We look forward to higher quality posts from your account in the future. Thank you.

If you have questions about this removal, please message the moderators.

1

Rxpert83 t1_iydupig wrote

In the biological sciences, you really need the PhD to maximize income.

Toxicologists are in high demand right now, and 6 figs with a PhD is pretty easily doable.

0

NoFilterNoLimits t1_iydvyea wrote

Bonus points - Ph.D programs are usually funded w/stipend.

1

gangstashit818 t1_iydwiqn wrote

UCLA does this but it's not enough to cover rent. Have to be poor for another 5 years lol

1

NoFilterNoLimits t1_iydwr24 wrote

Yes, it’s definitely a broke life, without a partner to subsidize. 😂 I’m not familiar enough with the field to say if it pays off over earning experience

2

Rxpert83 t1_iye87n2 wrote

The Society of Toxicology publishes a paper with salary figures of it's members every 3 years. The last was in 2020

Those in industry are all over 100k, topping 150k around 10 years exp, 200k around the 20 yr mark.

Independent consulting is well over 200k with 10+years experience.

0

gangstashit818 t1_iydw39t wrote

Just not sure if spending another 5 years getting a PhD is worth the investment.

1

Rxpert83 t1_iye897o wrote

Age will def play a role in whether the timelines are worth it for you. Most PhD programs should give you a stipend and cover tuition, but it's peanuts.

The Society of Toxicology publishes a paper with salary figures of it's members every 3 years. The last was in 2020

Those in industry are all over 100k, topping 150k around 10 years exp, 200k around the 20 yr mark.

Independent consulting is well over 200k with 10+years experience.

1