Submitted by ScaryStatistician t3_10pek4q in personalfinance
Hi all,
Looking for some honest feedback.
Our current situation - we live in a HCOL suburb of Boston. Very residential neighborhood, but the school district for the town isn’t rated the best (A on Niche as opposed to A+). We bought our house for 700k and currently per Redfin and other agents, is currently worth 900k. The problem is that the house is small and we’re outgrowing it very fast. We also don’t have a garage, which gets brutal in the winter.
Our maximum budget for a new house is 1.3M, but in a town with a better school district that would find us an older house that needs a lot of work, or in a less residential/desirable part of town, or no garage, or one similarly small. A house in the town we want with the amenities we’d like will cost at least 1.6M, which is out of our budget.
Now our proposed idea - there are many houses in our neighborhood similar to ours that were completely razed and rebuilt to larger, more modern homes with two car garages; 3 on our street in the past year actually. Houses that were sold for 700k were rebuilt and sold for 1.9-2.2M. We’re wondering if it makes sense to move into an apartment or something for a year and rebuild our current house. I contacted a couple of builders who estimate 500k for the rebuild, which falls within our budget of 1.3M (700 + 500 + 100 for rent/unexpected expenses). Our son is a year old and won’t need to join a public school system for at least 3-4 more years and by the time he’s ready we’ll have a house worth 2M (plus whatever appreciation has happened in 3-4 years) in our current town which we can sell to be able to afford a nicer house in one of the towns with better school districts.
I understand it’s a huge undertaking since we’ll have to pay rent while paying for a mortgage, not to mention the stress of dealing with builders and contractors. Our thought is even if we do buy a house for 1.3M today, there’s no way it’ll appreciate to 2M in 3-4 years, but with the proposed approach, our 1.3M investment should end up in 2M.
Another factor is our current mortgage is locked in at 3.2%. If we do sell and buy a new home, we’ll need a new mortgage for a much larger amount at around 6%. If we take a construction loan for the rebuild that will end up in a mortgage when completed, it would be for 500k at 6%, as opposed to nearly 1M at 6%.
I wanted to know what you guys think.
Please be as brutally honest as possible.
_GrilledAsparagus_ t1_j6k26mb wrote
A to A+ seems like a pretty modest change considering the undertaking. That said that could be a more significant difference then the rating eludes to, I’m not too familiar with that rating system.
Are you tied to the current general area due to commute, family, just pure preference?
The plan to overhaul your house sounds pretty good in practice but there are so many factors that would go into pulling off a maneuver of that scale, combined with the current economic uncertainty and it just doesn’t feel like it’s worth floating that amount of risk for what honestly has such an uncertain degree of payoff, and if the wrong event(s) take place, could leave you just breaking even or in a financial hole with huge mess to sort out.
I ask my initial question about what ties you to that area, because you might be able to get something that checks all your boxes, is in your budget, located in beautiful town and with a A+ school system if your able to distance yourself a bit more from the city, just say 30-35min opens up a lot of options.