Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

doc89 t1_j19ec7l wrote

Yes, it registers with me. I think the city would function better if people who can't afford to develop their undeveloped properties sold those properties to people who can afford to develop it. In many cases these properties are worth several hundred thousand or millions of dollars. These are not "poor people" generally.

People sitting on empty lots/abandoned buildings because they either cannot afford to or don't want to develop is a major inhibitor of growth. This behavior should be discouraged through the tax code.

6

flamehead2k1 t1_j19mjsb wrote

>I think the city would function better if people who can't afford to develop their undeveloped properties sold those properties to people who can afford to develop it.

The biggest holder of unproductive property in the city is the city itself.

Don't need to dramatically change the tax code, just get those sheriff sales moving!

1