Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Robert_A_Bouie t1_j5zdz37 wrote

Why does the fucking Art Commission get to weigh in on restaurants appropriating public spaces? Shouldn't that be L&I, Streets or Zoning?

119

mybigbadthrowaway t1_j5zjc1y wrote

The Art Commission is chartered with reviewing anything that is installed on or over a public right of way. They're the last step in the process.

It goes Streets Department, L&I, Art Commission if I remember correctly.

61

Little_Noodles t1_j5zj2e3 wrote

It’s a pretty natural extension of responsibilities they already have.

The board is part of the city’s Department of Planning and Development and is supposed to vet the structures (and other forms of development) to make sure it “is beautiful, orderly, and appropriate so that the City is a desirable place to live, visit, and do business.”

Murals and public art and stuff like that is only part of their job. One of the big complaints about streeteries has been that they either look like shit from the start, or are built cheap and look like shit in two months. So part of the approval process goes through the agency whose job it is to tell business that their janky crap looks like shit.

30

CockercombeTuff t1_j5zpufm wrote

>“is beautiful, orderly, and appropriate so that the City is a desirable place to live, visit, and do business.”

Clearly they take the narrow view of this.

17

Little_Noodles t1_j5zq5tp wrote

‘Tis a mighty lift indeed, and their purview is, in fact, narrow.

They only have authority if city funds or public space is involved, IIRC

6

CockercombeTuff t1_j5zrcvo wrote

It was intended as a bit of snark. But the fact that this all goes through Streets, L&I and this Art Commission just screams exhausting bureaucracy.

11

44moon t1_j60dewj wrote

so we have them to thank for all of the beautifully-designed new construction in the city

−5

Little_Noodles t1_j60it6o wrote

No. Anything not built with city funds, or not on city-owned property doesn’t get passed through the Commission.

They get only get oversight over streeteries because they’re located on public streets

14

pretzel_enjoyer t1_j5ze3jt wrote

The good thing is that the Art Commission is the last stop for approval, so these are basically a go.

They were also the only ones on the agenda. Four out of 4 is a pretty good start for a completely new process.

23

nemesisinphilly OP t1_j5zezhq wrote

At last reported count 2.5 weeks ago there have been 50 applications submitted. Why would 4 being on the Agenda be considered good?

11

Little_Noodles t1_j5zkaio wrote

As long as they can stay open while an application is pending (they can), I see no problem with agencies being slow and deliberate during the early stages to make sure they get a new process right.

12

nemesisinphilly OP t1_j5zkvrv wrote

The problem is that the agencies didn't let anyone know that they were allowed to keep them up while the applications are pending until after the demolition deadline of 1/9.

>For example: If you’ve applied for a license, can you keep operating your current structure without fines until your application is approved?

>Answers have varied.

>Ben Fileccia, of the Pennsylvania Restaurant and Lodging Association, said he was under the impression that so long as restaurants had submitted an application, they could avoid fines for now. Montanez echoed as much in a Monday interview with The Inquirer.

>“[An unlicensed streetery] is automatic grounds for a citation,” Montanez said. “But we’re asking them if they’re planning to get it legalized, then to go in the system and apply, and then we say ‘here’s the process.’ ”

>But the Streets Department’s own website reports “all unlicensed streetery set-ups must also be removed beginning January 9, 2023.” No licenses had been issued as of Monday, officials said, as the application approvals remain ongoing.

>Asked for clarification, Streets officials later confirmed that restaurants can indeed continue operating their current streeteries without fines, so long as they have pending applications.

https://www.inquirer.com/news/philly-streetery-outdoor-dining-restaurants-law-fine-20230109.html

12

crispydukes t1_j5zwvuv wrote

There's a trick in here, keep submitting and keep being rejected while keeping your current streetery up indefinitely.

11

Little_Noodles t1_j5zlm4x wrote

Yeah, that sucks. But it’s the kind of problem that emerges when organizations move too quickly and don’t communicate well with one another. I don’t see how compounding the problem by rushing and making inconsistent mistakes now will help. If they rush it and one restaurant gets denied for something that slips through and is ok somewhere else, shit isn’t going to get less confusing.

But given that I know you can, and I’m just some asshole that spends too much time in bars and restaurants, any restaurant operator that doesn’t know it by now has bigger problems than the streetery license.

1

nemesisinphilly OP t1_j5zmuz4 wrote

The point is it's not rocket science. It's been 2+ months since the application process began. Other cities with similar climates and street layouts have it figured out. What's so complicated that after 2 months less than 10% of applicants have made it to the last hurdle?

3

LFKhael t1_j5zu2x0 wrote

San Fran blew right past this and, instead of tying them to one restaurant, made them public spaces to be approved by the city instead of placing an enormous burden on a singular business at a time.

6

taskermorrisrider222 t1_j5zcvbw wrote

Wow, when's the next review? Didn't applications just open?

Anyone know why certain streeteries like Bing Bing Dim Sum are still up?

18

nemesisinphilly OP t1_j5zdpyt wrote

There is one meeting a month, and if the AC doesn't approve it this time the business would have to come back the following month, or whenever they correct whatever AC didn't like.

Applications opened on Nov 15th so it's been 2+ months since they opened.

Businesses are allowed to keep the streateries up as long as they have a pending application.

34

yugtahtmi t1_j5zxlgt wrote

Yeah, I know someone who applied. I think they said there's only like 50 applicants in the process so far. I think it buys you 2023 if you apply.

8

mortgagepants t1_j63r37g wrote

"just change your job title to food and beverage director or something. then your application goes to the bottom of the pile. i know guys 20 years working in vegas without a license."

4

lawgirl3278 t1_j5zz95b wrote

I was curious about Bing Bing too. And Cantina. Both of their streeteries are bolted to the street, which isn’t permitted by the new rules. So how do they get to stay up?

2

nalgene_wilder t1_j5zyzim wrote

>Anyone know why certain streeteries like Bing Bing Dim Sum are still up?

Lack of enforcement

−10

TheNightmareOfHair t1_j60fld6 wrote

How these meetings should go:

"Is it more desirable than a parked car? Yes. Don't even have to look at the design. Approved. Moving on."

10

AzzBar t1_j61sssz wrote

Sometimes a SINGLE fucking car

1

bukkakedebeppo t1_j60jdhd wrote

Is there anywhere to see the list of pending streetery applications?

4

nemesisinphilly OP t1_j6124ks wrote

No they haven't released that info.

3

bukkakedebeppo t1_j615rz9 wrote

I have to guess Bishop's Collar did, because their stuff is still up. I hope they get approved.

0

dcowboy t1_j61t2o8 wrote

I was pleased to see theirs still up. Now bring back the rest.

4

41sa t1_j601946 wrote

Good news for pedestrians.

3

mynameisntjeffrey t1_j64y2ky wrote

My local coffee shop removed their streetery a few weeks ago. It’s so sad seeing space that used to be so vibrant with tons of people always out sitting be replaced with 2 parking spots.

Don’t get me wrong I hate it when it becomes a visibility concern on corners, but this spot was actually heavily used and now the inside of the joint is almost always completely full.

1