Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

kifn2 t1_j3t0ivx wrote

No, I don't. Neither is it up to me to provide one. When someone makes a claim of causation, it's up to that person(s) to prove it. I did read the state's "study" however. It's very biased . Also, I'm not saying that simple correlation isn't a
good argument for keeping the cameras. It could be, but to imply causation when all you have is correlation is disingenuous and biased.

−10

flamehead2k1 t1_j3t3993 wrote

The people making the claim have a detailed report and it isn't just a simple correlation as you claim.

Do you have a critique of the report or are you only critiquing the headline?

9

kifn2 t1_j3t8sf4 wrote

I know. I read the whole report. Very biased.

−8