Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

bumharmony t1_j77ks8a wrote

Reply to comment by Trubadidudei in There Are No Natural Rights (without Natural Law): Addressing what rights are, how we create rights, and where rights come from by contractualist

Did you know everything - including iffy natural scientific stories - are man made so man madedness does make an argument against anything?

2

Trubadidudei t1_j784962 wrote

> so man madedness does make an argument against anything?

I'm going to assume that there is a "not" missing between "does" and "make".

And this is the kind of useless statements that only make sense within the vacuum of philosophical discourse.

You know, there are a lot of iffy man made scientific stories about something called "oxidation", but I guess it being man made means that it's equivalent to all other man made stories. Hey, how about we go for a fun little duel of equal man made ideas! I'll grab my gun, and you go grab your pheonix-feather core wand. My bullets can't pierce your Protego Maximus, and I'm sure you can Expelliarmus me before I shoot you in the head.

5

bumharmony t1_j785d73 wrote

And for lunatics like you we need man made rules so that you don’t get to roam free which is naturally a vacuum-like ground zero for the discussion rather than a man made thing.

1

Trubadidudei t1_j78rket wrote

Certainly, resorting to personal insults does tend to suck the life out of the debate, as well as concede the fact that you have nothing to say in reply. A good argument is clearly not one of the man made things that you can make.

3

bumharmony t1_j78stnj wrote

I have never gotten past the point of introductory knowledge in these Reddit discussions.

Instead every day there are several new introductory topics about same themes.

Must be the limitations of chat bots.

−2