Submitted by seethehappymoron t3_11d0voy in philosophy
BobDope t1_ja7vqkv wrote
Reply to comment by Avalanche2 in AI cannot achieve consciousness without a body. by seethehappymoron
Eh we advanced beyond the if then stuff some decades ago
BobDope t1_jada0vt wrote
To elaborate, at the most basic level, the fact you are using a nonlinear activation function in neural nets makes it decidedly a different animal from ‘if then’. Although with tree models and such yea they are a very convoluted mess of if then statements no human programmer would wish to work out themselves. The recurring theme is these things increasingly run away from our ability to understand or reason about them, although many researchers are doing work in that area
[deleted] t1_ja8au2p wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ja8zm1d wrote
[removed]
BernardJOrtcutt t1_jabu66y wrote
Your comment was removed for violating the following rule:
>Be Respectful
>Comments which consist of personal attacks will be removed. Users with a history of such comments may be banned. Slurs, racism, and bigotry are absolutely not permitted.
Repeated or serious violations of the subreddit rules will result in a ban.
This is a shared account that is only used for notifications. Please do not reply, as your message will go unread.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments