Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

3good5you t1_jd8zqzf wrote

I see what you mean, in general, but that would lead us to basically not being able to say anything is something, wouldn't it?

1

Michamus t1_jd90n5g wrote

Not really. We just don’t have enough data to conclusively make a claim like that. Especially since historically when claims of true randomness have been made, they’ve turned out to not be the case. It would be interesting if it turned out to actually be the case, though. Once we actually start relying on it functionally, we’ll know for certain if it’s really the case.

1