Submitted by phileconomicus t3_ycisnw in philosophy
SuperSirVexSmasher t1_itnqz66 wrote
Reply to comment by Ill_Department_2055 in Lab-grown meat could let humanity ignore a serious moral failing by phileconomicus
What the hell, when the did I insult you? I simply criticized your [pattern of] objection. If you think humans aren't privileged in relation to all other life on earth in this context then it's OK to destroy humans for your benefit the same way it's OK to destroy other things for your benefit - since it's all the same, right? I really don't think you believe that. I think you actually agree with me but don't want to play along. I don't think you actually disagree with me but are rather in a bad way and don't want to play along with the discussion. While I'm trying to explore this idea you're trying to explore ways you can pick at my responses to you. I think my assessment was correct. You may disagree.
What I've gotten so far is:
X - asks a few questions
Y - You demand: "Give me more"
X - gives you more
Y - "it wasn't good enough!"
X - "OK.."
Y - *Well i don't like your answer"
X - "But isn't it basically the answer?"
Y - "Wrong!"
X - "You're wrong!"
Y - "DON'T YOU LOB PETTY INSULTS AT ME!" D:<
Blueberry_206 t1_itprino wrote
>If you think humans aren't privileged in relation to all other life on earth in this context then it's OK to destroy humans for your benefit the same way it's OK to destroy other things for your benefit - since it's all the same, right?
Maybe it's not OK to destroy anything for our benefit? That way - yes, it's all the same.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments