PrimePhilosophy t1_iu5xv75 wrote
"Even though philosophy and psychology headlines are often meaningless, writers should at least aim at presenting some meaning through them because meaning makes things important."
Honestly, I'm convinced it must be some algorithm spitting out these headlines and not an actual human being..
iiioiia t1_iua1l99 wrote
> Honestly, I'm convinced it must be some algorithm spitting out these headlines and not an actual human being
Implying humans aren't also ~algorithm driven....
PrimePhilosophy t1_iubcryj wrote
"Implying humans aren't also ~algorithm driven...."
No that's your interpretation. I was referencing algorithms that aren't humans.. hence the "AND NOT an actual human being" part of my comment.
iiioiia t1_iudjpts wrote
I realize that. I believe you may have missed my point.
PrimePhilosophy t1_iueyej1 wrote
Perhaps..
iiioiia t1_iuf2paj wrote
It's possible to find out, but not mandatory.
thenousman OP t1_iu6a0z0 wrote
yeah, I probably should’ve left it at: “even if they never get it right, philosophers should still aim to” but I got carried away 😂
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments