Yetanotherone4 t1_iwv4wv5 wrote
Reply to comment by Newtothiz in For world philosophy day 13 thinkers share the philosophical questions that will define this century | Including Noam Chomsky on destruction, Naomi Oreskes on climate crisis and Carissa Veliz on innovation by IAI_Admin
Waiting on sauce, and also not sure why philosophers would be considered knowledgeable on this subject.
Newtothiz t1_iwv5ng1 wrote
People who talk about "source" in the case of arguments haven't read a philosophy book in their life. Prove me wrong.
mementoTeHominemEsse t1_iwvy1te wrote
He's not asking for a source as in argumentation; he's asking you to back up the claim that most philosophers agree that IQ is not a good measure of intelligence.
Newtothiz t1_iww8j8b wrote
Source: Any book on the philosophy of science, Decartes Meditations, Spinoza's Ethics, the whole German Idealism movement from Kant's Critique of Judgement to Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit, Heidegger's Being and Time, French Postructuralists like Foucault, Lyotard, Deleuze. This isn't a topic you just ask for "source" when you are completely unaware of the whole historical development of the idea you're asking for
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments