Submitted by contractualist t3_yzmht5 in philosophy
Purely_Theoretical t1_ix3hjm5 wrote
Is there a social contract in the first place? Can the terms of the contract be rejected?
contractualist OP t1_ix3omtk wrote
Yes there is a social contract which shapes our moral law and grounds our legal system. I discuss it here and my substack newsletter is dedicated to the topic. If you have concerns with contractualism/contract theory, let me know and I'll address them in a future post.
The contract doesn't rely on literal consent, but what our consciously free selves would accept or our free selves that act in accordance with our principles. So we cannot reject the terms of moral law. We can only obey or violate it.
VitriolicViolet t1_ix5groz wrote
>So we cannot reject the terms of moral law. We can only obey or violate it.
well, actually we can.
just move societies, dont like US values? move to the EU or China id they fit better.
luckily morals differ across the world, so we can pick and choose those we prefer in a limited fashion.
contractualist OP t1_ix5r1r2 wrote
Morals don’t differ, although formal legal rules can. All just laws must rely on the same foundational moral principles. My substack is focused on addressing just this issue and will be happy to address critiques in future posts.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments