HalfmadFalcon t1_ixfsb4z wrote
I had a friend who studied humor and we talked at length about it at times.
He ascribed to the “benign violation” theory, that something was funny when it violated some sort of social norm or expectation and when someone undeserving was not hurt emotionally or physically by said violation.
Uncoolx2 t1_ixgl5i8 wrote
Seems like an ethical definition of humor. Not that it doesn't make sense.
Though I would also argue that humor may be repugnant as a form of persuasive speech: calling into attention acceptance of injustices.
Humor that offends can be meant to offend as a way to force you to reassess your view.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments