MichaelOraProNobis t1_iyitych wrote
Reply to comment by ting_bu_dong in Why “the Christmas feeling” is more profound than you think - some holiday themed philosophy by Melodic_Antelope6490
I would say that there is always change, not that there can be change. As long as there is motion there is change.
Not to be pedantic but it is impossible to repeat the past. We can experience things that bear a resemblance with the past. There can be behavioral patterns that act in a particular way that is shared among all humans but the manifestation of that behavior and the results of are unique to that point in time.
Remakes while I agree are a bit to repetitive or redundant for my liking, are new and different. Like Heraclitus said about not being able to step in the same river twice. The perceived lack of difference is dependent on the scale of the examination. The complaint of Sisyphean repetition can just speak to a jadedness or hedonistic dulling.
ting_bu_dong t1_iyiuzzh wrote
>Not to be pedantic but it is impossible to repeat the past.
Well, sure, that's why I framed it as "recreation" of the past (or maybe "reproduction").
Whatever you want to call the conservative force that keeps keeps society from radically changing.
MichaelOraProNobis t1_iyiwbbr wrote
What do you mean by “radically changing?”
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments