Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Scrybblyr t1_iz12qqn wrote

But it doesn't mitigate it, even a fraction of a percent, it just delays it.

If some people see death as a problem to be dealt with (and eventually solved) then I have no issue taking advantage of whatever scientific breakthroughs they might come up with. If they can discover a way to stop our telomeres from fraying, I'll sign right up. But I view death as a necessary part of life. I don't buy into transhumanism, and it seems like this notion may come from that school of thought.

To be fair, as a Christian, I already believe in eternal life, so I have less riding on the notion of "solving" the problem of death than one might have if one believes the grave is the end of consciousness.

1

ting_bu_dong t1_iz14871 wrote

The fact that, eventually, you can't fix a machine anymore, and you have to deal with that, doesn't mean that you should neglect fixing the machine at all.

> I don't buy into transhumanism, and it seems like this notion may come from that school of thought.

>To be fair, as a Christian, I already believe in eternal life

Isn't that just transhumanism with extra steps?

9

Scrybblyr t1_iz14luk wrote

>The fact that, eventually, you can't fix a machine anymore, and you have to deal with that, doesn't mean that you should neglect fixing the machine at all.

Well good, then I'm glad I never even came close to suggesting that.

​

>Isn't that just transhumanism with extra steps?

No.

1

ting_bu_dong t1_iz14vri wrote

> Well good, then I'm glad I never even came close to suggesting that.

I'd think "acceptance" does, in fact, suggest that. "Eh, body's broken, what are ya gonna do?"

>>Isn't that just transhumanism with extra steps?

>No.

Well, I mean, if the goal is to live forever.

5

Scrybblyr t1_iz1ckne wrote

>Well good, then I'm glad I never even came close to suggesting that.
>
>I'd think "acceptance" does, in fact, suggest that. "Eh, body's broken, what are ya gonna do?

If you actually want to conflate "acknowleding that death is part of life" with "neglecting to fix the machine at all," that is certainly a choice you can make. Seems like a bit of a stretch to me.

​

>Isn't that just transhumanism with extra steps?
>
>No.
>
>Well, I mean, if the goal is to live forever.

The goal of transhumanism may be to live forever. The goal of Christianity is not to live forever. Christians believe that everyone does live forever, albeit not in the same place.

1

ting_bu_dong t1_iz1kswu wrote

>The goal of Christianity is not to live forever. Christians believe that everyone does live forever, albeit not in the same place.

The goal of a religion isn't to believe the beliefs of that religion? Well, alright.

2

Scrybblyr t1_iz2o82v wrote

>The goal of a religion isn't to believe the beliefs of that religion? Well, alright.

That isn't what I said. I said:

>The goal of Christianity is not to live forever. Christians believe that everyone does live forever, albeit not in the same place.

2

Funoichi t1_iz3h9on wrote

And yet Christians are obsessed with death to the extent of burying heads in sand. That’s the whole thing about atheism, it’s taking life cold turkey, no opiates involved to placate.

Atheists see christianity as a death cult, because if this life is of so little value, there’s no reason not to advance to the afterlife right away.

It’s a worldview exemplified by fear and one that devalues and renders our actual lives meaningless auditions.

0

Scrybblyr t1_iz4r7cc wrote

>And yet Christians are obsessed with death to the extent of burying heads in sand. That’s the whole thing about atheism, it’s taking life cold turkey, no opiates involved to placate.

Some have argued that atheism is the opiate for people who cannot bear the thought of a holy, omniscient, omnipresent God to whom they must one day give an account.

​

​

>Atheists see christianity as a death cult, because if this life is of so little value, there’s no reason not to advance to the afterlife right away.

I suppose some atheists may hold that view, if some atheists are ignorant enough about Christianity to think that it ascribes "little value" to life.

​

​

>It’s a worldview exemplified by fear and one that devalues and renders our actual lives meaningless auditions.

Spoken as if by someone utterly unaware of the worldview in question. Christianity holds life in very high regard indeed. Pro-life, one might say.

Since you seem kind of condescening and rude, vs someone interested in discussion, I will go ahead and block you at this point, as I am not interested in that kind of exchange. Peace.

1