Happyradish532 t1_j0i9ihr wrote
Reply to comment by WaveCore in The good/ binary in morality is misguided and can be dangerous | Tommy Curry, Massimo Pigliucci, Joanna Kavenna by IAI_Admin
The other user said no truth at all is better than a false truth. Sounds like you're saying something else. That you'd rather believe partially in something that may be wrong, and change your mind later. That's different than believing in no truth, which I see as offering the subject no thought at all. I guess we just interpreted the other users comment differently.
CaseyTS t1_j0j0wo2 wrote
> That's different than believing in no truth, which I see as offering the subject no thought at all.
Careful not to accuse your opponents of not even thinking just because you strongly disagree. People carefully think about and consider things that they do not have a definite truth for all the time, and even someone who questions everything and believes only in subjective reality (i.e. no objective truth) might think deeply about things.
Happyradish532 t1_j0m61u9 wrote
Fair enough, but I'm not accusing anyone of anything. Those were the words they used. How else was I supposed to take it?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments